If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway - Removal of the PLC Chairman and related matters

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by rodders154, Aug 14, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FrankC

    FrankC Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    2,110
    Thank you for that Crantock, but I will respond to Snifter's last posting.

    The same comment applies to 9351 as applies to Odney Manor, namely that the existing Board has no knowledge of the Board ever having discussed it and we do not intend to discuss it.

    As for your other question, as Crantock implies, we are not going to enter into a discussion about WSR budgets and finances on a national public internet forum. If you are a shareholder, then you can contact the Finance Director if you have a particular question though I would urge you not to do so at the present, given the amount of work we are currently undertaking. It is also the case that we would not usually expect to release information beyond that which is already in the public domain. Given the amount of interest in the progress of the company it is likely that there will be a mid year shareholder meeting after the end of the running season, though I stress that no decision has yet been made, so there is no point please in pressing further at the moment on when this might be or what information will become available. We will release further information as soon as we can.

    Frank
     
    baldbof likes this.
  2. Snifter

    Snifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    4,210
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thank you Frank for confirming that there is no intention to discuss the sale of either loco. That is very reassuring.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  3. patriarch

    patriarch New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    192
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Stourton, Stourbridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Unless contained within official WSR plc Statements, or Statements published under the WSR plc Company Secretary's name, I am not inclined to have faith in information conveyed by an individual whether that individual is wearing a director's hat, or not.
     
    michaelh, 35B, nine elms fan and 3 others like this.
  4. lochness8

    lochness8 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2016
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    289
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Businessman
    Location:
    Weston super Mare
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite so, especially as some PLC Directors have very recent form when it comes to acting unilaterally, keeping others in the dark and not being 100% honest about their intentions.
     
    michaelh, Jeff Price, 35B and 3 others like this.
  5. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Are you commenting personally or on behalf of the WSRplc Board?

    The first question arising from the Statement is obvious 'what information is in the public domain?' Being an 'interested outsider', I am not aware of whether reports of WSRplc Board Meetings are circulated on the Railway or to Shareholders. I understand that any reports of recent meetings are likely to be heavily redacted and also understand that, while difficult decisions are being considered, a running commentary may be unhelpful. Nevertheless, the WSRplc has a wide range of 'stakeholders' who must be very concerned by recent activity, reports and lack of practically any official comment and clearly the rumour mill is in full working order. I would therefore suggest some form of official information would be helpful to all concerned.

    I am a little concerned that the above, be a personal or Board statement, refers only to information to 'Shareholders' and not to any other 'Stakeholders' , specifically the volunteers (and indeed paid work force). They are a vital part of the WSRplc remaining a viable and operational business and would be ignored at the Board's peril yet get no mention above (and indeed 'if you are a shareholder, then you can.....' implies no-one else has a right to ask).

    In the circumstances, and in particular after the financial warnings which date back to Alan Nicholson's time in the Chair, I believe anyone with the West Somerset Railway's interests at heart will be anxious to hear news of at least when the WSRplc Board expect to have formulated plans to arrest the financial situation, which can't have been helped by the 17% increase in costs last year. Again, as an 'outsider', I am not aware of whether any reports have been made available to Stakeholders of performance this year, whether that increase has been arrested and how revenues are doing but I am sure they are also awaited with considerable interest and potential concern.

    Steven
     
  6. nick813

    nick813 Well-Known Member Loco Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,503
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    poole dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    May be the new Chair in all but name.
     
    lochness8 likes this.
  7. lochness8

    lochness8 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2016
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    289
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Businessman
    Location:
    Weston super Mare
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I’m afraid this just smacks of the same old exclusivity and “leave us alone we know what we are doing” attitude. As long as certain Directors continue to behave like this rather than an open and honest dialogue with all stakeholders, as Mr Bean Counter says, then we are no further forward.

    Incidentally whatever happened to the so-called (but frankly laughable) ‘stakeholder consultation’ on the corporate plan that took place earlier in the year, was not Mr Courtney central to this initiative at the time?
     
  8. Faol

    Faol Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    1,875
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Any port in a storm
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hi Keith, sorry old friend but I think my irony got lost somewhere. Ken
     
  9. Faol

    Faol Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    1,875
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Any port in a storm
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Steven, if said asset was sold to a support charity and then leased back it could provide cash for the PLC and revenue for the charity. Much like businesses do with buildings when they sell them to their pensions schemes and then lease them back or am I in cloud cuckoo land?
     
  10. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Asking a provocative question , but who controls the MPD budget and ensures engines and maintenance regimes are good practice and offer value for money . 9351 and 7828 , overhauls delayed ? 44422 needing more attention (rushed overhaul ?) s160, 7822, now 34046 on hire for the season which is good news for those engines , not necessarily for the railway finances
     
  11. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It certainly would - indeed, the charity could even enter an agreement where the PLC had responsibility for maintenance and or overhaul and hence payment back is reduced or not even made. The Charity would need to be able to show that the purchase and arrangements were within its Objectives, and that whatever usage agreement was reached, the Charity's asset was protected (i.e. would the Company be likely to be in a position to meet its obligations under the agreement).

    A Charity would struggle to justify just tipping cash into a struggling PLC unless a wholly controlled subsidiary, but it would be able to make a deal whereby it paid a fair price for an asset that could either be used in furtherance of its objectives or be a good investment.

    What I would advise by way of caution is that, whilst such an arrangement would look a lot like 'One Railway' at its best to many, if there are those who don't believe in 'One Railway' and who are terrified of anyone else having a say in how their 'trainset' is run, they may see such a suggestion, no matter how helpfully it is presented, as being an 'attempted takeover' and use it to spread further fear and division.

    Hence, whilst a thought, perhaps more information on the extent of the problem and any cash shortfall would be needed before such solutions are suggested.

    Steven
     
    MellishR and ghost like this.
  12. Faol

    Faol Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    1,875
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Any port in a storm
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks Steven, Looks like a very serious contender for a plan, I hope FrankC is reading this as it could be the Railway's move towards One Railway and solvency.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  13. snappertim

    snappertim New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    472
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Many years ago when I was involved in the then cash strapped K&ESR I was closely involved in setting up the Norwegian Loco Trust and the Terrier Trust. Both charities still exist in support of KESR. I am not party to the financial arrangement s but my understanding is that the locos concerned cannot be sold to the detriment of KESR which is perhaps in contrast to the sale of shares in 4160
     
    Paul Kibbey, Bean-counter and Faol like this.
  14. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Aren’t we back to the issue of the relative underperformance on the WSR of fund raising to support the railway? It’s one thing suggesting one of the support groups comes to the rescue in the way you suggest, but I don’t get the impression that either the WSRA or the WSSRT have the middling six figure sum immediately available that might be a reasonable price for a near-operational ex-BR tender engine. Perhaps more critically, if numerous comments on this thread about people’s donation priorities are a guide, I can’t see the level of engagement or trust with the membership to suggest that an appeal to raise that sort of figure would be successful. Across the whole railway family, trust is hard won and easily lost.

    Tom
     
  15. Ploughman

    Ploughman Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    5,806
    Likes Received:
    2,649
    Occupation:
    Ex a lot of things.
    Location:
    Near where the 3 Ridings meet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The same could also apply to other departments of the railway, without which nothing could operate.
    S+T, PW and C+W for a start.
    A railway does not revolve solely around its loco's.
     
  16. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You seem to be comparing apples and pears. "Trusts" of this nature are not ipso facto incapable of becoming insolvent, but their bankruptcy remoteness arises from their limited activities and hence limited opportunity to incur liabilities (hoping that if the loco runs over someone, the aggrieved party gets paid out by the operator / its insurance rather than going after the owner). It seems to be a bit of a straw man here, but what appears to be under discussion is the wisdom of let's say a hypothetical company selling a significant and emotive asset, to keep the wolf from the door. Having an asset to sell is of course a happier position than having nothing to sell, even if it is not ideal. Other railways have sold locos, the SVR and Leander springs to mind, without imploding, and I think the WSRA has form. I think the main objection to selling an asset to fix a structural issue is that the sale proceeds just kick the can down the road, unless the structural problems are fixed, so the sale should be just one element of a more comprehensive solution.
     
  17. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    true , but in terms of creating a black hole loco's are rather fine exponents of the art . WSR (happy to stand corrected) don't seem like a line with urgent track renewals or collapsing infrastructure which leads one towards the thought of what else is consuming cash
     
  18. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think it might more be that locomotive costs are better known and arguably (though I might well disagree with this statement myself!) more 'similar'. Locomotives can be hired, albeit at a cost and against an uncertain supply and a 'seller's' market. If Railway X runs from A to B but the track or a structure at C in the middle is not fit for use, that Railway no longer exists as what it was. Simples. Not saying this is the situation on the West Somerset but I seem to recall a lot of track work was needed for 60103 to visit and while spending the profit on that visit upgrading the track was probably a sound enough investment for the future, the question remains as to whether the existing business (and structure), as it is currently being operated (and structured), is generating sufficient cash to enable renewals to continue as they are needed. @Ploughman is wise in his warning.

    Steven
     
    michaelh, Paul42, 35B and 2 others like this.
  19. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    I am very pleased to read Frank Courtney's posts today.

    Some people owe him a considerably debt of gratitude for what he did for the Reform Group and getting rid of the old Ex-6 Trustees.

    It is strange how memories of recent events can be so fickle, and those who benefited directly, so apparently ungrateful currently.

    Cheers,

    Julian
     
  20. Dennis John Brooks

    Dennis John Brooks Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2014
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    885
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    North Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Here, here, people forget how Frank C & Michael R cunningly ran that EGM & in my opinion saved the WSRA. He now gets treated the way he has by the present trustee's, absolutely disgraceful!!!

    DJB.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page