If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Tornado

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Leander's Shovel, Oct 20, 2007.

  1. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    We manage to make it work in Marine Enginerooms and Drilling Rig environments which are hardly lab conditions.
     
    MarkinDurham and jnc like this.
  2. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,609
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The counter argument is that these vehicles ran for decadeswithout oil warning lights, this particular one has run for 100,000 miles without the slightest hint that this might happen and its forebears did likewise. Perhaps when the cause has been ascertained this kind of thing might be considered but implementing such a system makes a rod for backs it becomes an integral part of the locomotive and as such if it isn't working the loco itself could be deemed unfit to run without it. Pressure on other Locomotive managers to install such systems then follows... like air conditioned coaches - maybe that's a good thing/ maybe its not.
     
  3. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not to mention that the real challenge is to design a system that doesn't generate false alerts.

    I've no doubt that it's possible - I can't believe that a steam locomotive is that uniquely difficult and hostile an environment to instrument - but suspect the real issue would lie with calibrating the monitoring. That then becomes an issue of time and effort - on what are still very limited resources compared with the other examples given up thread.
     
    staffordian and jnc like this.
  4. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed its not, but you have a ready stable power supply, you don't have that same issues with steam, extreme heat, horizontal driven rain or snow or the same range of differentials in operating environment. A steam loco makes a marine engine room look like a lab environment in comparison.
     
  5. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Gentlemen a number of steam tours get canceled because of the failure of the existing mandatory electronic systems, and they are in comparison simple systems. You seriously want to get more tours cancelled because of the inevitable spurious failures of relatively trivial warning systems?
     
    staffordian, Jerr Grey and MellishR like this.
  6. Andy Williams

    Andy Williams Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    908
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In this instance it is doubtful whether temperature monitoring would have made any difference. It is perfectlty feasible, in a situation of reduced or no lubrication, for a piston valve to seize in its liner within its normal operational temperature range.
     
    andalfi1, staffordian, jnc and 4 others like this.
  7. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I dispute they are all much more severe in electronic environmental terms than a steam loco.
     
  8. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,063
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    At last, a piece of information that makes far more sense than almost all of the chunter so far including the notion that maybe technology could have saved the day on Saturday or into the future.

    There is a certain irony in the fact that the Heritage Railway Association saw fit to give the Coiley Locomotive Engineering Award to the A1ST in February this year. It was stated as for 90 mph running but actually had more, I think, to do with the technology that was introduced to try and safeguard high speed operations such as the very sensible temperature monitoring of the middle big end whilst on test.

    But you can't monitor everything. All you can do is have a rigorous and thorough maintenance regime that keeps a check of all the known risk areas. And as it appears, even that may not be sufficient.
     
  9. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,315
    Likes Received:
    16,391
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I agree, quite apart from the extremes of heat vibrations caused by converting reciprocating motion to rotary motion at speed won't be kind to delicate electronics. The cure would probably be worse than the problem. An enforced stop to examine on a busy mainline because of a red light due to a malfunction of the equipment could become a frequent occurrence. The loco has run 100,000 mile with just one major failure which is a pretty good record so no need for any knee jerk reaction
     
    Jerr Grey likes this.
  10. Victor

    Victor Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    13,773
    Likes Received:
    7,940
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    DEWSBURY West Yorkshire
    Deleted, I'd best try keep out of this, IMO that Mr Bunkers statement/email said all that needs to be said until the A1 lads have got to the bottom of it.
     
    Johnb likes this.
  11. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I must have been to different drilling sites to you then :D
     
  12. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,162
    Nail on head! It is sometimes worthwhile to monitor the temperatures of parts that should normally run cool, notably the inside big end, as was done routinely with the stink bombs and in a more sophisticated way on the 100 mph test run. (But even that can give you false positives. Some railways have trackside hot box detectors, which get excited when a steam loco with a hot ashpan goes past.) Monitoring the temperature of a piston valve head would not only be challenging to implement but, with steam flowing in and out some of the time and being shut off some of the time, you would get a mass of data containing very little useful information.
     
  13. NSWGR 3827

    NSWGR 3827 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    40
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Fitter & Machineist
    Location:
    Down Under
    Having read all the comments and viewed the Video of the Loco at Peterborough, from what I can see I do not believe that the damage had been caused by a seized Valve as the video at Peterborough shows the inside Radius rod to be completely intact. You get a good look at the 2.03 mark in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=00N0Y2UCuuo If a valve seized I would expect the radius rod to bear the brunt of the forces involved, and end up severely bent or broken. The damaged components in the 4 foot look very similar to a failure that occurred in another country a few years ago, however this was on a Loco with outside valve gear and at a lot less than 90Mph, and the Combination Lever did not end up broken.
     
  14. JJG Koopmans

    JJG Koopmans Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2014
    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    474
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As a consequence I don't see why the discussion is about temperature measurement where an oil flow sensor would suffice.
    Kind regards
    Jos
     
    andalfi1, ross, Chris86 and 5 others like this.
  15. gwalkeriow

    gwalkeriow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I remember LMS 5000 at a Severn valley gala back in the late 70s had a valve seize at low speed, the only damage to the valve gear was a broken combination lever.
     
  16. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,771
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    This thread reminds of those that appear on pprune after an aircraft crash. All manner of people claiming all manner of expertise chip in with their theories as to what happened, almost all of which turn out to be wrong.
     
    big.stu, jnc, Sheff and 3 others like this.
  17. Richard Roper

    Richard Roper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Librarian
    Location:
    Just up the road from 56E Sowerby Bridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    According to the A1 Steam.com's archive page
    https://www.a1steam.com/category/history/
    This from the 2003 section
    Cylinders and valves – Ufone machined all six valvechest liners and the front steamchest covers were machined by North View and delivered to the works. Meanwhile A1 Trust volunteers were making good progress producing the cylinder draincocks.

    Richard.
     
  18. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,041
    Likes Received:
    15,732
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Wasn't it linings which led to the fall out with WCRC?
     
  19. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,609
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Suppose it depends at what point in the cycle the sieze occurs. ie is the motion being crushed or pulled. also break will always occur at the weakest link. which to some extent will vary from design to design or even from loco to loco.
    The fallout with WCRC was a cylinder liner rebore(skim ) using a contractor not on WCRC 'S approved list iirc
     
  20. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's a brave thing to say when you are about 10,000 miles further away than those on the spot!
     
    LMS2968, Sawdust and Spamcan81 like this.

Share This Page