If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Hydrogen Motive Power

Discussion in 'Diesel & Electric Traction' started by 30854, Aug 17, 2020.

  1. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Following on from the 'Class 321' thread, a recent announcement by Eversholt Rail concerns putative production of "Class 600" H2 powered stock. On the plus side, it's pleasing to note that the location earmarked to become "UK Hydrogen Central" is (..... drum roll .....) Widnes, though I note the absence of any mention of the words 'export markets' .... which may be tied in with the firm's collaboration with Alstom (mentioned in the url below).

    If it's the case that home production will concentrate on UK loading gauge stock (and there'll be a lot of that, as ICE kit goes dodo-wise into oblivion), that may still leave CIÉ/NIR as a potential market for UK produced kit. This may strike some as premature (and they may even be right!), but clean tech is going to be massive over coming decades ..... and UKPlc could do much worse than casting an eye to the future from 'Day One'.

    https://eversholtrail.co.uk/news/ev...1-million-in-breeze-hydrogen-train-programme/
     
    60017 likes this.
  2. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,190
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What about

    upload_2020-8-17_14-25-47.jpeg

    A poo train?
     
  3. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,496
    Likes Received:
    23,739
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They'd better not try hydrogen on the Voyagers then.
     
  4. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2018
    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Alstom are leaders with the Coradia iLint hydrogen powered train in Germany. But the train is too high to work in the UK. So the technology is being installed in Eversholt's converted class 321 trains to become class 600 Breeze trains.
    However rival Portersbrook and Birmingham Uni are making headway with their class 319 conversion to class 799 Hydroflex train and from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-y8787303/amp/Hydrogen-powered-train-run-mainline-time-TODAY.html
    and will be first to run a hydrogen powered train on the UK mainline North Cotswold line from Oxford to Hereford.
    If all goes well the class 600 will also get a mainline test soon.

    From the Daily Mail Transport Secretary Grant Shapps hopes hydrogen trains will start taking paying passengers in 2023 and replace Diesel in 2040.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2020
  5. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,190
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  6. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2018
    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Davo likes this.
  7. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    "Currently, only 4% of UK production of hydrogen is the ‘blue’ variety produced by electrolysis, let alone true ‘green’ hydrogen from renewable electricity. The bulk of hydrogen (Brown Hydrogen) is produced by Steam Methane Reforming (SMR), which releases CO2." (Roger Ford)

    Patrick
     
    Martin Adalar likes this.
  8. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,070
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    For hydrogen to become a mainstream sustainable source of traction energy, both the supply side, generating the hydrogen sustainably, and the consumption side, using it to power locomotives and multiple units, need development. Both parts can and should be done in parallel. It would be silly to wait until the generation has been fully sorted out before working on the utilisation.
     
  9. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hydrogen is a shocking waste of electricity (approx 3 times as much as needed to move the same train using Overhead Line Equipment, I believe). OK, if it's for a small fleet or a low-density traffic niche, but the saving in electric consumption when using OLE should be a factor in deciding which way to go. UK plc is not going to be flush with surplus generating capacity, after all.
    Pat
    Edited 13.49 as underlined.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2021
  10. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    I wouldn't disagree, but the promise of it is being used instead of electrification. Wiring of the core is still the key, and the government is ducking it. The promise of hydrogen is part of its cover. The Government's most recent paper quoted hydrogen 50 times and electrification 2, both for road transport.

    I also feel that for long, remote lines (think Central Wales and North of Scotland) the CO2 in (bio)diesel-battery hybrids is relatively so small as to be manageable by offset.

    A massive increase in renewable and CO2 free energy generation is necessary, and (back on thread) development of off-peak production of hydrogen seems sensible.

    Patrick
     
  11. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Whilst agreeing with most of Patrick's (@D1039) post, the one absolute no-no has to be bio-diesel (certainly unless some stop-gap (only) means of producing same from marine algae is proven). The reason is actually glaringly obvious .... land usage. If growing crop for a hydrocarbon fuel industry, merely seeking to delay it's own oblivion, obviously the same land can't then be producing food.

    Over the longer term, I'd expect the economics of the whole issue to supervene, in strong favour of electrification, but in the meantime, there's disquieting scope for a mammoth politically driven wrong turn here. Keeping the present day oil barons in clover, at the expense of the rest of the human race and the planet's biosphere generally, ain't any sort of good reason to derail the journey to clean tech.
     
    35B likes this.
  12. sleepermonster

    sleepermonster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    A mammoth driven railway has possible green credentials. If we had any mammoths.......
     
    Dunfanaghy Road likes this.
  13. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired SPM
    Location:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    This has been raised quite a few times but this item from "The Engineer" is one of the clearest.

    Cheers, Neil
     
    Martin Adalar likes this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,190
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would have thought that the diesel needed to run the remaining non electrified minor lines (Cambrian, Looe etc) would be minimal
     
  15. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,496
    Likes Received:
    23,739
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It would. They aren’t to hand right now, but one Voyager from Edinburgh to Birmingham emits more CO2 than the entire Far North Line in a day.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  16. oldmrheath

    oldmrheath Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,265
    Likes Received:
    2,452
  17. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    "DMUs on these Scotrail [Far North and Kyle] services generate just over seven tonnes of CO2 a day...A Voyager making an Edinburgh to Plymouth return journey emits just over 10 tonnes of CO2."

    Patrick
     
    35B likes this.
  18. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,190
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Which could almost certainly be reduced if we were to reduce the performance a bit - and indeed reduce the speed and acceleration of all transport.
     
  19. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,496
    Likes Received:
    23,739
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Debatable how much, though - the Voyager engines are more than twice the power of the Sprinter engines, and there are 4 or 5 of them under each set.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  20. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    3,077
    I think worrying about rail CO2 emissions is misplaced at this time. The focus should be on aircraft emissions, both cargo and passenger.

    BTW a Maersk Line Triple E is of similar size to the Ever Given.

    CO2 emissions by mode of transportation CO2 g/ km
    Airplane (air cargo) 560 g
    Modern lorry or truck 45 g
    Modern train 18 g
    Modern ship (Maersk Line, Triple E) 3 g

    https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/158911010/Working_Paper_4_Emissions_from_Shipping.pdf
     

Share This Page