If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

BR steam liveries

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by 22A, Jan 11, 2021.

  1. Johnb

    Johnb Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    10,554
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thankfully now history
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2021 at 9:00 PM
    Richard Roper, Cartman and LMS2968 like this.
  2. MattA

    MattA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2014
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    296
    Location:
    82F
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I normally like a blue engine, but I make an exception for this one.
     
  3. D1002

    D1002 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    2,877
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Enfield
    Too right.
    Not one of the Lakeside and Haventhwaite Railway’s brightest ideas. However, I recorded it for posterity.....and as an example of a livery that was totally unsuitable for that loco
     
    MattA likes this.
  4. Cartman

    Cartman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    716
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It looked terrible
     
  5. J Shuttleworth

    J Shuttleworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    As a small boy in the seventies, I rather liked it and wanted the Wrenn version (as applied to the former Hornby Dublo Std 4 tank). I also liked the Wrenn LMS red version, which, for the pedants, certainly couldn't be described as maroon or crimson lake!

    On a more serious note, the 'rules' for BR liveries were set out quite clearly, once they'd been established but that did not stop localised variations by the individual painters. Lining styles varied, as did numeral sizes. In respect of the latter, I got it wrong, when specifying the cabside transfers for 35018 and hadn't noticed until it was pointed out on a thread on this forum.

    The BR/BTC liveries were, however, a pretty impressive roll-out of a corporate image, even if rather dull, before such things became established by BR's own 1965 rebranding, which is the benchmark for such things.
     
  6. Johnb

    Johnb Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    10,554
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Until it’s recent revarnish I don’t think the cabside numbers on 35028 were correct either
     
  7. peckett

    peckett Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    243
    Not the 1960s but 8700 on 84E Tysley 01/06/1958.
     

    Attached Files:

    Jamessquared likes this.
  8. Johnb

    Johnb Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    10,554
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That is the prewar 'shirtbutton' livery, so its survived well.
     
  9. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    9,359
    Likes Received:
    5,139
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    31A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Was it St Rollox that used larger numbers on cab sides and used to line out the back of the tender? Don’t know whether it’s just me but 44871 seems to have larger cab side numbers than 45212 and 45407.
     
    Richard Roper likes this.
  10. Johnb

    Johnb Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    10,554
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes it was St Rollox and 4871 had the larger numbers, 5407 doesn’t but has the Scottish blue background to the front numberplate
     
    Richard Roper and Matt37401 like this.
  11. peckett

    peckett Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    243
    I'm glad to see I wasn't the only enthusiast not using the BR 4 in front of former LMS loco's ,this was never done even by loco men in the 50s,i'm only just geting into the habit,!,other regions 3 for southern and 6 for LNER were treated the same. The ST Rollox big numbers were bigger than on 4871,I think.Please see attached 5730 Ocean(rare machine for East Midland spotters ) and 57432 taken at 66A Polmadie on 17/08/1958 for comparision.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. John Petley

    John Petley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,549
    Likes Received:
    1,510
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    On the Central section of the Southern, it sometimes went even further! There's a picture in one of my books of 32588, an E5 radial tank at Rotherfield on the Cuckoo Line. Only the final three digits of the smokebox number plate had been cleaned, with both the BR-added "3" and the SR-added "2" scarcely visible. In other words, its home shed (probably Eastbourne) still thought of it in terms of its LB&SCR number - 588.
     
  13. 35B

    35B Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    14,448
    Likes Received:
    11,555
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    One wonders, for consistency, should a zero really be placed in front the numbers of those identical copper capped things from Swindon?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  14. clinker

    clinker New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    127
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    romford
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I got a real filthy look from the Late Roy Swain when I referred to the Liverpool street Buckjumper as 68619, and a rtetort of 8619 if YOU please. Another Stratford Locoman spoke the number as Eightysix nineteen. Although being a Cockney it was more like AAeesic nine een
     
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    19,667
    Likes Received:
    34,714
    Location:
    215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There was an interesting point I noticed when I looked up the boiler record of the boiler currently fitted to the Wainwright H class. The clerk at its first post-nationalisation repair dutifully lists the locomotive number to which it was fitted as 31521, after which each subsequent repair lists the locomotive number as the old SR numbers, even as late as July 1961 when the boiler is recorded as being repaired while in locomotive 1263).

    Tom
     
  16. J Shuttleworth

    J Shuttleworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Now that's just silly!

    The post-nationalisation re-numbered added multiples of 10,000 to each number, not merely placing prefix digits on the number. The broad gauge locos were given the series upto but not including 10,000, because the locos had cast numbers on the sides - either that or the plan was conceived by a Swindon man.

    But you know that.
     
    35B likes this.
  17. Mr Valentine

    Mr Valentine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    491
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Go back far enough and there would've been people arguing that proper Western engines didn't have numbers, just names.
     
  18. 45581

    45581 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,534
    Likes Received:
    319
    Even after the end of steam at Carnforth ( 17th August 1968) 03391...jpg , they referred to LMS engines with just four digits...............
     
  19. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,513
    Likes Received:
    3,322
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Pleased I'm not the only one. I worked at Edge Hill, admittedly but not too long after steam finished and the LMS numbers were always used in the mess room. And oh yes, the names were NEVER used, just the four-digit number.
     
    Richard Roper and andrewshimmin like this.
  20. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    477
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    And some Charlies just had part of the number cleaned, giving C10 &c.
    Pat
     

Share This Page