If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. 5801

    5801 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2014
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Those are the directors of the Association, not the PLC
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  2. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,646
    Likes Received:
    7,694
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I no longer have any particular interest in Minehead Matters, but

    I would take a good deal of convincing given what has been put in the public domain that the railway has a future.

    While I do not see it as a panacea clearly were the structure to be reorganised in the way suggested by @Lineisclear which is broadly similar to most other heritage railways it would assist with fund raising and address issues about accountability of the board.

    Clearly this is not a cost or risk free option but nothing suggests that the current situation is sustainable.

    @Robin Moira White has been involved with the WSR for almost all her adult life and it runs past the bottom of her garden so clearly she has more interest in it than most, hence her comments and questions.
     
  3. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    18,890
    Likes Received:
    12,294
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The problem is this, you have 3 organisations, the steam trust, the WSRA, and the PLC, and a degree of past animosity between each, neither really trust the other, the PLC, and the steam trust, seem to have had a revolving door between each's board room, with directors and trustees seemingly being in one, then in the other, the trust's large shareholding, is used to ensure the WSRA can never threaten the status quo, this in part because the WSRA at one point went rogue and tried to buy the freehold and give it power over the railway, now the real power is the PLC and its in the hands of someone, with a rather worrying past as regards regulations, and running a transport operation, Its unfortunate that Robin, was identified as being a threat by some on the railway, but Clearly they saw a reason to get rid of people who asked questions, questions the board, and others would rather not be answered, and in doing so, IMHO, brought not just their own railway into disrepute, but the entire movement, in how they went about it, and should be ashamed of themselves for it,
     
  4. Snifter

    Snifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    4,298
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Correct, now go back 4 pages and join the dots.
     
  5. Chard Branch

    Chard Branch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2024
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    3rd rock from the sun
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I understand that they were told that they may be in breach of charity law which could lead to the loss of their house.
     
  6. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    27,971
    Likes Received:
    27,495
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I have previously been advised as a trustee that if I disagree fundamentally with a decision my options are limited to resigning or remaining within the board, and that this is especially so if the decision gives rise to legal exposure.

    IF that was the discussion, then the response makes sense, but a huge amount would be buried in the detail of legitimately private conversations
     
    Barrie Childs likes this.
  7. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    18,890
    Likes Received:
    12,294
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Surely, though, they should have understood the limitations of what a charity can do in support of its published aims, and if gifting financial support to the PLC crossed those boundaries, then why didn't someone say, stop, we can't do this, in this manner, and found a work round that would enable help to be given without putting the charity into breach.
     
  8. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,967
    Likes Received:
    2,954
    Presumably those Trustees who didn't resign did not agree with that interpretation of the law and/or may've sought their own legal advice on whether the charity is acting lawfully. I've no idea who's right.
     
    35B likes this.
  9. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    27,971
    Likes Received:
    27,495
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There was an earlier discussion about what the WSRA's charitable objects are, and (from an outsider's perspective) whether or not the WSRA contribution would be inside or outside of those. That can be summarised as "it's a grey area", especially when as outsiders we do not know the details. We also do not know what advice was on hand, or the finer terms of the decision - I note that the report of the November Trustee meeting references this decision, and also that "agreed conditions" are in place; again suggesting that the choice was not black & white.

    In that situation, opinions can legitimately vary, and so can the responses of those who lose the vote. As a trustee, I have been outvoted on matters that I've regarded as important, and had to consider how I would react if I was on the losing side of the vote. In the example I have in mind, I strongly believed (and still do) that I was right and the majority wrong, but that the choice was one on which opinions could legitimately vary. As such, I have accepted the majority decision, and now consider myself bound to help make it work.

    What is most concerning is that, if the resignations were a result of this decision, a board has split and the WSRA has lost good people from leadership as a consequence. That suggests that the messages of unity are at best over stated, and point yet again to the wider WSR having difficulty in accommodating differences of views.
     
    MellishR likes this.
  10. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,827
    Likes Received:
    5,518
    Resigning as a trustee doesn't protect you from the fall out of actions taken when you were a trustee.
     
  11. Cuckoo Line

    Cuckoo Line Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2020
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    369
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As an onlooker WSR seems to generate more discussion than any other railway. What most others seem to have is a coherent business plan and restoration plan bougt in by all groups, which you may agree or disagree with but there will always be someone unhappy, can't please everyone. What seems to be missing at WSR is a visible coherent business and restoration plan bought in by all parties, until that gets sorted we will have pages and pages more discussion. What is a shame there are obviously a lot of people concerned about the future of WSR not engaged with it.

    Sent from my SM-A556B using Tapatalk
     
    johnofwessex likes this.
  12. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,680
    Likes Received:
    2,043
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The amount of "discussion" any one railway gets is often more to do with the number of volunteers or visitors who have a particular gripe about it. Much of this thread is the same (small) group of people making similar comments.
     
  13. Keith Sims

    Keith Sims Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    702
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired from volunteering
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    To change the subject and get back to "operations" on WSR. Has anyone any results available for the test runs of "ovoid" fuel? Is there a future for these on the railway and what are the costs involved?
     
    sitimela43, hyboy and JBTEvans like this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,646
    Likes Received:
    7,694
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I suspect that as other Forums/facebook/Whatever is available there may be some 'go to' sites to discuss The Twatlington Tramway or whatever & Nat Pres may well have the joy of being the 'Go To' place to discuss the WSR
     
  15. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    7,855
    Maybe, but the WSR has a peculiar set of poor culture (possibly in the past, but possibly not) unhelpful and inefficient governance structure and communications which I would describe as inconsistent, veering between its all fine and we are in serious financial trouble. At the very least this last is going to raise questions.
     
  16. Fish Plate

    Fish Plate New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2015
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    822
    Location:
    The Northern Hemisphere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  17. Snifter

    Snifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    4,298
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    "‘A CCBS will bring us many benefits. It should mean the SVR could claim Gift Aid on a large proportion of ticket sales. There’ll be significant savings in both compliance and administration costs. We’ll be able to avoid prospectus costs on any future share issues and potentially avoid having to pay business rates. These factors will add up to hundreds of thousands of pounds every year that can instead go to maintaining and improving the railway itself."

    What a great idea, it's a pity that some folk were bent on preserving the same old self-serving structure. Just as ye sow....... and all that.
     
    Fish Plate, ghost, 35B and 3 others like this.
  18. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,037
    Likes Received:
    9,338
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  19. Keith Sims

    Keith Sims Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    702
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired from volunteering
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  20. Lineisclear

    Lineisclear Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2020
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    1,283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worcestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Possible, yes, but not straightforward! In any event conversion to a community benefit society requires a 75% voting majority of PLC shareholders. The stumbling block can be that shares in a CBS must be one vote per member not one vote per share. The decision can also be influenced by whether the PLC has a provision in its Articles that on dissolution ( assuming there’s anything left after creditors have been paid) remaining assets do not belong to the shareholders and must be transferred to another entity with similar purposes.
     

Share This Page