If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

SVR General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by threelinkdave, Aug 20, 2014.

  1. lostlogin

    lostlogin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    248
    One benefit of running diesel's is that I believe the operating costs for the railway are generally cheaper. The downside being that a certain percentage of the customers want and expect a ride behind a steam loco. Are there any figures from the SVR or other railways on the impact of passenger numbers when trains are not steam hauled. Do a significant percentage of passengers simply decide not to travel at all or do many simply try, where they can, to delay their visit until steam is operating again
     
    jnc likes this.
  2. Wagoniester

    Wagoniester Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2017
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    1,949
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'd need to find the article, but a few years ago the NYMR was cited as saying passenger numbers went down by at least 50% whenever steam was stopped for lengthy dry periods. I'm certain another has more recently said they see a 70% drop in footfall, but can't remember which line that was at.
     
  3. Spitfire

    Spitfire New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    173
    Occupation:
    General Manager
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Consistently about 40% drop at NNR when diesels sub for steam during high fire risk spells.
     

Share This Page