If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

V2 4771 Green Arrow to return?

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Davo, Mar 22, 2019.

  1. Kylchap

    Kylchap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2015
    Messages:
    521
    Likes Received:
    1,002
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    East Anglia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A fabricated block could be a way forward, like the P2. It would depend on whether the highest priority for Green Arrow was retaining its originality or becoming operational. It seems that both are not possible.
     
  2. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    32,189
    Likes Received:
    34,766
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed. My point, given the persistence of the view (myth?) that the monobloc is irreparable, is that the means of repair or replacement can't assume that a fabricated replacement would be acceptable.
     
    silversteellady and Miff like this.
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    29,154
    Likes Received:
    70,691
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Isn’t there a question of reversibility? That is, hypothetically you could remove the existing cylinder block and preserve it; and replace with a new set of cylinders (of any construction method, it wouldn’t matter visually); but doing so wouldn’t preclude a later reconstruction of the loco with its original cylinders, albeit for static display only. So a restoration with new cylinders doesn’t seem to me to preclude a future return to “original” condition if that was deemed important. (*)

    (*) As an aside on that, if the monobloc cylinders are considered a significant engineering artefact in their own right, then they are probably better appreciated in any case as a standalone item, and possibly - speak it quietly! - sensitively sectioned.

    Tom
     
    CH 19, Fred Kerr, ChuffChuff and 7 others like this.
  4. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    32,189
    Likes Received:
    34,766
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's a fair question, but that then also leads into questions of preservation ethics - questions that cannot be answered definitively, and are in reality matters of judgment rather than right/wrong
     
  5. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,232
    Likes Received:
    3,464
    I agree however, at least until the 2019 policy is revised, it may be assumed NRM’d be open to considering the idea if there was a source of funding. Otherwise, logically, the policy would either not have mentioned GA as a candidate or could easily have said it’d be considered only if the existing cylinders were repairable.
     
  6. osprey

    osprey Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11,705
    Likes Received:
    3,332
    Occupation:
    semi-retired, currently doing R&D for my patents
    Location:
    Halifax
    I think casting techniques have moved on since the 1930's...
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2026
    class8mikado and Spamcan81 like this.
  7. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    1,447
    My understanding was that initially, the plan was that 4771 would go to Doncaster temporarily whilst 990 was undergoing conservation work, and the two engines would be swapped in due course. Whether that is still the plan, I don't know. All I can say is that 990 remains on display in the Great Hall at present.
     
  8. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,979
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Capabilities especially around moulds certainly have, but so have other production methods, especially for complex one offs.
     
  9. W.Williams

    W.Williams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2015
    Messages:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    1,619
    Occupation:
    Mechanical Engineer
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Interesing.

    With modern tecniques and tech, its all repairable, weld can be added, machined back, heat treated, etc etc, but there is a legitimate question on preserving the original block as part of the original rationale for preservation.

    If we want to preserve that, and run the machine, its reasonable to have a go at casting a new monoblock and put the old one on display.

    I suspect the bigger question here is that this cannot in any way be done in isolation.
    Tear out the monoblock and more will be found.
    And there is the boiler.

    So its almost certainly £1m before we even get out the gate... and... is it appropriate use of funds that the NRM have 2 mainline locos in ticket with all the associated costs at the same time... ???
     
  10. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,979
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    One hoped the Streamlined Duchess would be top of the list or is damaging the casing too much of a risk...
     

Share This Page