If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Lynton and Barnstaple - Operations and Development

Discussion in 'Narrow Gauge Railways' started by 50044 Exeter, Dec 25, 2009.

  1. Old Kent Biker

    Old Kent Biker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,059
    Likes Received:
    1,762
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    IT Consultant (retired)
    Location:
    Kent UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I am yet to receive my paperwork, and I know the instructions & protocols seem to change every year, but surely, anybody appointing a proxy can direct their proxy to vote 'as they see fit' on any ballots taken at the meeting where they have not indicated a vote, which would thus include any votes tabled at the meeting such as a vote of (no) confidence?
     
  2. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,870
    Likes Received:
    19,479
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't think it works like that. Even where the proxy has left everything blank, that's still a conscious decision they've made on those agenda points. Even if you could though, I suspect it wouldn't work as the chair tends to hold most proxies and unless specifically instructed otherwise, it's pretty inevitable he or she would wield those proxies against in such a vote.
     
    Old Kent Biker likes this.

Share This Page