North Yorkshire Moors Railway General Discussion

I reacted to what you wrote. That’s all.

 

Ok, now you may react to what I clarified for you.

you went straight to a company/railway/society implementing it essentially in bad faith and imposing it, whereas I was assuming, possibly foolishly apparently, that a railway/company/society might decide to do something after properly thinking it through and consulting everyone then need it to happen because it’s what the majority want. After thirty years in railway preservation societies I’d like to think it was mostly the latter.

 

Also, you never know who the person who is your guest might be- they might be a person who would consider volunteering, or a person who might consider making a donation one day.

On a more personal note;
We had a lovely experience on the NYMR a few years back, the fireman on 'Repton' invited my daughter on the footplate whilst static in one of the stations and had her sat in the driver's seat (she was ecstatic).

The fireman let her put a couple of very small shovels on the fire with his help.

Completely made her weekend.

She still talks about when the "Kind fireman let her try the shovel on the big engine".

First impressions count- and inspiring the next generation is paramount to steam railways surviving.

 

How kind. Same response. It’s about balance. You have to balance the needs of the crews, the training needs and the opportunity to earn money. Sensitivity is required to the likely fact that footplate crews may not be the most willing customer facing staff. There’s not much you can do about that.

 

In my earlier post I mentioned a driver who did not want footplate experience people on his locomotive. For the avoidance of doubt, in my experience, most NYMR crews are quite happy to take them.

 

I agree the dislike of footplate riders is rare, but we did end up with them on every trip at one point on my line and then the resentment grew rapidly.

 

Even the Moors isn’t that greedy. Yet.

 

That's probably only because the thought hasn't occurred to them yet, though. Give 'em time!

 

If there are any railway enthusiasts still hanging on to the belief that they are a bigger market for heritage railways* than the desire of Fashionable Dad, Yummy Mummy, Knowledgeable Grandad (Because He Remembers Life Before The Internet) and the 2.4 Bloggs weans** to 'ride on a steam train', then the NYMR's 2026 fare structure will surely put the final nail in the coffin of the delusion?

I don't blame the NYMR for charging more outwith the school holidays (aka the marketing deceit/conceit of appearing to discount during the school holidays), despite the fact that I'm in the minority of customers who deliberately takes holidays outwith the school ones (to avoid the Bloggs clan), therefore will be one of those penalised. Given the main market, it makes commercial sense.***

However, there is one thing I don't understand. What if I want to do a full Grosmont - Pickering round trip, but from an intermediate station? Say Goathland>Pickering, Pickering> Grosmont, Grosmont>Goathland, but without wanting (and therefore paying the extra £15+ for) a day rover?

Do I rock up at Goathland ticket office and (A) buy a return two stop ticket (to Pickering) and a return one stop ticket (to Grosmont) at the same time (£24.95+£14.95=£39.90)?
Or do I (B) just buy a return three stop ticket (£34.95) which covers Grosmont to Pickering?

Any ideas?


* A belief filed by most rational individuals alongside Santa Claus and the tooth fairy decades ago.
** All with volume turned up to 11 for the duration.
*** Despite the C word being about as acceptable as a different C word in enthusiast circles (look at any thread about the NRM).