If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Mystery of the LNER J7

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем S.A.C. Martin, 17 дек 2021.

  1. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    31 авг 2010
    Сообщения:
    5.620
    Симпатии:
    9.452
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Адрес:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have been doing some research for my forthcoming Gresley book (shameless plug over) and have come across a real historical oddity!

    I have a document entitled Use of Engine Power. This covers 1942-1946 for the LNER's locomotive fleet. I have been organising a part of my spreadsheet version of this document into a whole-line average for the different classes, when I noticed this:

    upload_2021-12-17_13-55-18.png

    A quick check of the LNER encyclopaedia here reveals this is the only class J7 listed: https://www.lner.info/locos/J/j7.php

    upload_2021-12-17_13-56-1.png

    These were all gone by 1936 according to the LNER Encyclopaedia, RCTS Green Books, and pretty much any source I have that lists them. So I thought - okay, hands up - I've made an error in the spreadsheet when copying across.

    Except, I haven't. Here's a snippet from 1946 where class J7 is clearly given:

    upload_2021-12-17_13-54-59.png

    One single locomotive of class J7 working in the SE part of the LNER.

    So here's the thing. Knowing how these records were collated, I am forced into thinking that there are a range of potential "truths"

    • A surviving loco has been put back into service. How likely is this? Not very given it would be 10 years since they were all supposedly scrapped
    • Another loco has been mis-identified. This seems more likely, but if it's a one off locomotive, then to add it into the statistics specifically as J7 seems unlikely.
    • J7 has been used to describe another class, possibly from another region. I can find no record of any 0-6-0s being loaned to the LNER, but they did loan the GWR some J25s
    Have I missed an historical quirk of the LNER somewhere here? Where and what was class J7 in 1946?

    Answers on a postcard...!
     
    Richard Roper нравится это.
  2. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    24 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.389
    Симпатии:
    5.374
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Адрес:
    Southport
    I am tempted to suggest a typo for J70 - the tram engines that were built in 1942 for service in East Anglian docks but 12 of these were built and presumably in service by 1946. Apart from that I cannot think of any alternative loco that served in the East Anglia division unless it was a USA 0-6-0 shunter on loan for local duties.
     
  3. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    8 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    4.117
    Симпатии:
    4.821
    Род занятий:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Адрес:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Does this J7 appear in a single record for a single year only, or is it in multiple years? If its just in a single year then I submit typo is the most likely explanation.
     
  4. bluetrain

    bluetrain Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    3 мар 2019
    Сообщения:
    1.581
    Симпатии:
    1.595
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Wiltshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I notice that the single "J7" is shown as belonging to the Southern Area Eastern Section (i.e. ex-GER), whereas the actual ex-GNR J7s appear to have always worked in Yorkshire & Notts.

    Have you got the right number of ex-GER J17s in the statistics? If one of those got mis-classified somewhere along the line ....

    Alternatively, could the "J7" have survived in use as a stationary boiler or some other non-running function?
     
  5. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 мар 2020
    Сообщения:
    1.843
    Симпатии:
    2.078
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Departmental engine, accidentally or intentionally put back in?
    (I discovered only recently that the departmental thing mattered for insurance purposes).
    Or, more sinister IPoRCTS...
    https://xkcd.com/190/
    Are you communicating with other statisticians...?
     
  6. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2017
    Сообщения:
    12.172
    Симпатии:
    11.496
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Cock up before conspiracy? OK ..... I can happily go with that. :Pompus:
     
  7. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    31 окт 2011
    Сообщения:
    1.614
    Симпатии:
    1.848
    Род занятий:
    Safety, technical and vehicle trainer
    Адрес:
    South Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Is it worth having a look in Box tunnel see if its hiding there ;-)

    Chris
     
    S.A.C. Martin, Bikermike, Bluenosejohn и 3 другим нравится это.
  8. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 мар 2020
    Сообщения:
    1.843
    Симпатии:
    2.078
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If you look, it disappears. Schroedinger's locomotive
     
    Spinner и Richard Roper нравится это.

Поделиться этой страницей