If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Driver Competencies

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by GWR4707, Mar 10, 2021.

  1. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not sure if this is the right place, but its another one of those inane thoughts which popped into my head when I couldn't sleep.

    Background to this is modern traction and specifically the suggestion that the recently stored Freightliner Class 86's were unlikely to be reactivated even if business improved and money was spent overhauling them as all the drivers have now been retrained to drive 90's and thus their competencies to drive 86's will lapse without use, i.e. they will no longer 'sign' for 86's.

    Got me thinking how does this work with steam engines, there is obviously a lot more to driving railway locomotives than just making them go and stop (as there is with an 86 & 90) but also certain commonality, so what happens when say a GWR 28xx (using these examples as I know it has happened) goes on hire to the NYMR or KWVR, obviously their drivers will be competent on the locomotives they drive on their home line, but how does driving a different beast get managed, is it done through the owners rep overseeing use (as I understand is the case with 60103 when she goes elsewhere), or do drivers have to go to the lending railway and 'have a go' before they can drive?

    Expanding it further, how does it work on the mainline, WCR introduced BIL the other year, now I cannot imagine anyone on their books had driven a MN before, likewise I cannot imagine that the first time the diver on test runs drove a MN was to open the regulator and drive her out of Steamtown, so do mainline drivers encountering new loco's on the mainline go to preserved lines to get expereince and competency in driving the class? Likewise same could be said with LSL and Royal Scot for instance. I vaguely recall that Tornado visited the Weardale Railway shortly before WCR started to operate her, considering the links between WCR and WR was that to allow WCR crews to get competency in driving her.

    I know competency in modern traction goes beyond just driving and includes things like management and fault finding, and understand that this may not be relevant to heritage stuff as on preserved lines they are never more than c.20 miles from an engineer, and on the mainline such competency is normally sat in a carriage behind the engine if not on the footplate, but just wondered how it is done.

    As you may have grasped I didn't sleep very well last night! ;):D
     
  2. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think that the most obvious case of this was the LNWR Super D. Somewhat different than other steam locos!
     
  3. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Likewise and I should have mentioned with regards to LSL what are they going to do re 60532.
     
    green five and paullad1984 like this.
  4. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,106
    Likes Received:
    57,444
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    On the Bluebell, with the home fleet, the assumption is that your competency at any particular grade is across the whole steam fleet - which is one reason why our driving and firing tests are multi day affairs, and will take in a range of locos. I suspect that when Fenchurch and Beachy Head enter service, we will probably need some refreshers on air brakes for people who have gone up through the ranks without using them.

    For visiting engines, it depends a lot on the owner. Some have come unaccompanied and we have just been left to get on with it; some have an owner's rep who will ride with it but let the crew drive and fire, maybe offering some guidance; occasionally one will come (generally an incoming mainline loco on a charter) where the mainline crew drive and fire, and we would just provide a conductor driver for route knowledge / rules purposes. It really depends on the owner. It is normal with visiting engines that we get an instruction sheet which ideally discusses any particular oddities the loco may have. In things I've been on, probably the Beattie Well Tank was the most challenging to understand, and came unaccompanied. The Coal Tank had its quirks, but the KWVR provided a rep to ride with it, though we did all the driving and firing.

    Tom
     
  5. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Wouldn't WCR drivers have worked BB/WC - is an MN that different?

    Perhaps this is why we are seeing the pool of loco types getting a bit smaller? ie Bulleids, Black 5s, Castles, A3/A1/A4? This is maybe my perception compared to the 1980s when it seemed like there were a lot of different classes on the mainline - S15, N15, LN, Manors, Halls, Kings?
     
  6. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,072
    Likes Received:
    20,781
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Fascinating topic that may go around in circles! @Jamessquared has already described his understanding of how The Bluebell works and I'd be surprised in other heritage lines are much different. So I'll just comment in generalities about the main line, but, of course, not as someone who operates on the footplate of main line steam.

    I think we are about to discover that 'competency' takes many shapes and forms and is partly dependent on who judges that anyone is competent. So as to avoid any finger pointing let's just say that this can work at many levels. For example, some locomotive owners with a knowledge base that extends way beyond the experience of some footplate folk may have an entirely different view as to what constitutes a crew's competence to manage and understand their locomotive. Just because an operator is happy that a person is 'competent' doesn't necessarily mean that a loco owner may be as happy. That's why the relationship between the operator/TOC and the loco owner (when the loco is not the property of the TOC) is critical.

    The other area is, of course, route knowledge. At present, it seems that several activities are taking place to refresh the knowledge of some crews and in some cases, I guess, familiarise people with new routes. It is, after all, a year since many people have travelled specific routes except for people like DBC who have a day job that has continued throughout the pandemic. But even then there is likely to be the need for these crews to undertake 'refresher' activities on steam and see the road again from the footplate rather than the cab.

    A few might take the view that 'signing the road' is easy nowadays as all you have to do is sit in front of a screen and travel the line on YouTube. That, of course, is nonsense as the whole interaction with the technology of the route from a noisy footplate rather than in the relative quiet of a cab is what has to be tested as well.

    I think we should assume that the best set-ups will be on the case with this one and take nothing for granted.
     
  7. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I see what you mean and that was my initial thought, but is an 86 that much different from a 90?
     
  8. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,321
    Likes Received:
    16,401
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I’m not sure of the situation now but in steam days a driver was declared competent to drive and was expected to handle whatever type of locomotive he was presented with on his shift. If it was a type that was totally to him he might be allocated a loco inspector to ride with him, I think this happened on the GE section when they borrowed a few Bulleids during the time the Britannia’s were withdrawn after there were instances of the wheels shifting on the axles
    When ‘foreign’ engines were used on steam specials it was usual to bring a crew with the loco and use the services of a local driver as conductor. This could lead to problems, I remember Bert Hooker relating telling story of when he was rostered you work a MN over Shap and back down the S&C. I think it involved 35012 and they were getting a bit short of water but the inspector reassured them that Dillicar troughs were coming up. Bert had to give him the bad news that they didn’t have a scoop. They were then faced with a water stop at Tebay and tackling Shap from a standing start.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2021
  9. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,336
    Likes Received:
    11,669
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not sure about that, I know that when we had the second Deltic age in the late 1990’s drivers who hadn’t Deltic knowledge did a 3 day course whereas drivers with 37 knowledge did a shorter course (day and half?) to sign for them.
    I would have thought they wouldn’t have been too much difference as class’s 86, 87 and 90 are descended from each other. I could be totally wrong though.
     
  10. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I don't know but they were built 20+ years apart. Maybe similar but different enough?
     
  11. ruddingtonrsh56

    ruddingtonrsh56 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Nottinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    My understanding is that, for whatever reason, that competency for diesel and electric locos has always been class-dependent, and it has not for steam. Maybe historically there was more of a perception that if you were unfamiliar with a steam loco, you could work it out, but that would potentially be harder for a diesel/electric / could go more wrong.
    Certainly at the GCRN you have to sign for each individual diesel, but once you're qualified on a steam, you're good to go on any. When we have short term visitors from other railways there tends to be a rep that comes with them. When we hired 46521 from Loughborough crews were invited down to Loughborough to have a familiarisation session. The loco was in steam, and we were shown round the loco, given tips etc. When we've had new locos come as our 'long term resident' sometimes we're just given the engine, sent out a PDF document with anything key we needed to know (idiosynracies of the loco, lubricator, owner's preferences etc) and maybe if other crew members have been on before you ask them for tips. When we had 2890 (the tender Austerity) there was a day before the season started when all crews were invited and we did a trip down the line with each crew getting a chance to have a go before we started carrying passengers. That's my experience with steam, at any rate. Can't really elaborate on diesels or electrics.
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  12. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2020
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    1,595
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    isn't some of this down to grandfather rights and the change in circumstances? Different class competencies wasn't a thing in the days of steam, and so has never come in. I'd think it's in nobody's interest to seek to change that now. Imagine trying to categorise the different steam engines - you'd end up with each one being a separate category.
     
  13. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I believe that steam competency is just that. There are drawbacks when stepping on to an unfamiliar engine, but there is nothing hidden "under the bonnet" as there is with modern traction. That said, when Eastleigh drivers started back on steam only 2 of the EWS men were "steam passed", the remainder being ex-firemen. So they all came up to the watercress Line for about a week, as at the time we had a BR Standard and a rebuilt Bullied (WCX) and, perhaps, a WC as well (I can't remember now). So there was an element of type training intended.
    Some years ago (1993, I think) a railtour changed engines at Southampton Central. I was the duty shunter and duly uncoupled E5001 and attached a Romanian 56. There happened to be 1 driver at Eastleigh who had driven Class 71's, but many years before. I imagine a session with the Traction Inspector and the old handbooks answered, as far as refreshing was concerned.
    Pat
     
    green five likes this.
  14. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Except for the GWR ones which are, so they say, all the same [grin]
     
    green five, std tank, Johnb and 4 others like this.
  15. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think the only real problem arose in WWII when a crew might find and engine they'd never seen before and completely different to anything they knew: the American 2-8-0s. They'd need to spend some time figuring out where everything was on one of those, and what it did when they found it. A problem arose with those engines in Britain: crews working unfitted goods down a gradient would screw down the handbrake and keep it like that for many miles. There were no unfitted goods in America so need to do that, and their chilled iron wheels weren't used to such treatment, and objected very strongly.

    But even engines from distant parts of Britain could present challenges: does it like a thin or thick fire? What shape, saucer, thick at the back, fire down the sides? How high should you carry the water? Don't try a full boiler with a Super D. For the driver, do you go for a short cut-off and full second valve, or ease down on the regulator and push the lever down? If it was an unfitted goods, how good was the engine brake?

    Realistically, the crews were expected to work all this out for themselves, and usually did so. A steam engine was basically that; there were differences, but you didn't get the subtleties you got with diesel and electrics. But in the fifties and sixties, a lot of diesel knowledge was about how to get them moving again if they sat down!
     
    Fred Kerr, Cartman, Johnb and 3 others like this.
  16. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Oh, I don't know. It is documented that crews at the ex- Midland Railway shed at Rowsley, on the Manchester Central to Derby line, would go off sick if they were rostered on an ex LNWR Super D that had worked in on a freight from the Manchester area.
     
    Cartman likes this.
  17. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,572
    Likes Received:
    5,225
    Showing my ignorance, when a member of staff 'signs a route' or signs 'a class of loco', what are they actually signing, and who establishes the standard?
     
  18. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,496
    Likes Received:
    23,739
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I believe that 86-90 is a significant difference because it spanned a move from (put very crudely) analogue to electronic control, whereas my understanding is that classes 81-85 were treated as a common competency.

    More generally, the difference on the diesel and electric side, which seems logical except that it has no roots in steam practice where there must also have been appreciable differences, seems to be that it is assumed that each type will have significantly different handling characteristics, and therefore drivers need to be trained for those characteristics.
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  19. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,336
    Likes Received:
    11,669
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    From my experience (albeit 20 years ago) if you sign a route, say Paddington Bristol it means you have knowledge of that route regarding things like gradients, signal sighting that kind of thing.
    If you sign for the traction say a Class 52, you are competent to drive a Class 52, your familiar with it and it’s foibles etc.
    I’m using these as an example because as I understand when 1015 first went mainline the owning group had some members who were A) competent on Class 52’s on heritage lines and the necessary paper work to prove it.
    B) They also had route knowledge on the ‘Big Railway’ and were also employees of EWS who ran that particular charter at the time.
    I think who establishes the standard is the TOC responsible for the movement?
    Im sure there was an instance of a 40 movement a few years ago where the driver signed for Class 40’s but worked for another TOC so had a conductor/inspector from the TOC responsible. I’m quite happy to be told otherwise this is from conversations had with friends who work on the big railway, so it might be I’ve misunderstood certain things.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2021
    35B and simon like this.
  20. Steamie Boxes

    Steamie Boxes Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2017
    Messages:
    696
    Likes Received:
    614
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Apprentice Enginner at NYMR
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    When visiting locos have come to Ravenglass in the past, either for a gala or on loan, the locos will have had a pilot man from the visiting railway for a couple of weeks to get drivers trained on it before our home drivers were allowed out solo. Such examples were Hercules and Wroxham Broad in past years
     
    GWR4707 likes this.

Share This Page