If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

GWR Dean Goods, County Tank, Class 4300 Mogul & Class 4700

本贴由 neildimmer2010-09-15 发布. 版块名称: Steam Traction

  1. neildimmer

    neildimmer Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2008-06-06
    帖子:
    9,180
    支持:
    1,145
    Hi All

    I have added 4 small collections of GWR locos, some photos taken in the 1930's maybe a bit rare, not sure.
    Dean Goods Class 2301 & 2361
    2369 Reading 1935
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176234.html
    2434 Pontypool 1935
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176231.html

    County Class 4-4-2T
    2243 Old Oak Common 1936
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176263.html

    GWR 4700 Class 2-8-0 freight loco
    4702 on a passenger turn at Plymouth 1961
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176280.html

    GWR Class 4300 mogul (Help with shedcodes please)
    5324 with Pembroke Coast Express headboard at 87G
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176274.html
    5335 at 88A
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176276.html
    5369 at 84D
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176277.html
    6397 at 83E
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176278.html
    7318 unknown
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176275.html
    5322 Caerphilly
    http://www.steamlocomotives.photos.gb.net/p67176279.html

    Neil
     
  2. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-03-29
    帖子:
    1,772
    支持:
    2,171
    所在地:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
  3. 50002

    50002 Member

    注册日期:
    2005-10-02
    帖子:
    312
    支持:
    1
    Shed codes:
    87G Carmarthen
    88A depends on date of picture, in 1960 it was Cardiff (Radyr) previously it was Cardiff (Cathays).
    84D Leamington
    83E St. Blazey
     
  4. 6024KEI

    6024KEI Member

    注册日期:
    2006-04-21
    帖子:
    861
    支持:
    475
    所在地:
    Bath
    I've read somewhere that the original counties and their tank deriviatives were a bit rough riding and weren't that popular with crews. Clearly they were non standard compared to the other 6 coupled locos, but I suspect if they'd been any good they'd have survived despite the two missing drivers!
     
  5. neildimmer

    neildimmer Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2008-06-06
    帖子:
    9,180
    支持:
    1,145

    Thanks i have put both Cardiff Sheds down for 88A as i am not sure of date of photo

    Neil
     
  6. gkerr9623

    gkerr9623 New Member

    注册日期:
    2011-01-04
    帖子:
    41
    支持:
    6
    职业:
    retired
    所在地:
    Todmorden
    I think the County Tanks were just outclassed by the 6100 class 2-6-2 tanks which arrived in the London area in the 1930s and there was no other suitable work for them. Similarly the County 4-4-0s were overtaken by the large number of Halls then being built. The GWR established itself as a six-coupled railway early on.
     
  7. Railcar22

    Railcar22 Member

    注册日期:
    2007-09-05
    帖子:
    239
    支持:
    30
    性别:
    职业:
    Stock Control
    所在地:
    Slough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Both the early 38xx County Class and the County tanks were disliked by crews because of their tendency to be very rough riders, it has something to do with the large reciprocating mass and the very short wheelbase
     
  8. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-08
    帖子:
    4,117
    支持:
    4,821
    职业:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    所在地:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The GWR retired all their large wheel 4 coupled engines in a fairly short period - roughly 1927-1933 so it was clearly a policy change. You'd have to say, I think, that they were as much replaced by Castles as anything else if you look at the numbers of express locomotives in existence at any time - 40 38xx and 70 41xx went over 1927-33 whilst 30 Kings and 30 Castles were being built. In practice Stars replaced Counties and Castles and Kings replaced Stars. Other lines were still building 4 coupled Express locomotives after the GWR had scrapped all theirs (except 3717/3440).
     
  9. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-03-29
    帖子:
    1,772
    支持:
    2,171
    所在地:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
  10. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-03-29
    帖子:
    1,772
    支持:
    2,171
    所在地:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
    I have heard rumors from didcot that the county 4-4-0 is going to go ahead. If so what parts do they have already? Do they have a spare no4 boiler or wheelsets or anything?

    Gav
     
  11. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-27
    帖子:
    5,294
    支持:
    3,599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I thought they were going to build a County Tank? Pity really, because the 4-4-0 is a very handsome engine , the tank less so imho.
     
  12. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-05-18
    帖子:
    6,081
    支持:
    2,217
    I beleive that the reason for builing the Countys was the weak bridges on the Joint Line through Shrewsbury not being cleared for Saints and once this was finally sorted there was no longer any need for the Counties.

    The County Tanks were mostly suburban engines and were outclassed by the 2-6-2ts which were more suitable.

    Both these classes would have been withdrawn when major renewals were needed and many of the components re-used so replacing them made econmic sense as well as improving operating factors.

    I'd love to see both re-created.Even more so, I would like to see more Victorian locos re-created, such as a GWR 4-2-2
     
  13. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2005-09-13
    帖子:
    12,910
    支持:
    1,387
    性别:
    所在地:
    Birmingham
    What was the County 4-4-0 like on Weight and route restrictions ?, If they were light enough would they have made a better choice for the Cambrian than the Dukedog "rebuilds" ?.
     
  14. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2007-08-25
    帖子:
    35,939
    支持:
    22,469
    职业:
    Training moles
    所在地:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    But are there enough unrestored locos still available to be butchered? :)
     
  15. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-08
    帖子:
    4,117
    支持:
    4,821
    职业:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    所在地:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Oh gosh no, they were red route locos with 18 tons 4cwt on the leading drivers and nearly 10 tons heavier than the Dukedogs. The Dukedogs were effectively Bulldogs downgraded with a lighter boiler than the Std 2 the Bulldogs had, and the County's had the even heavier Std 4. The Std 4 boiler could be a bit marginal feeding a standard front end when running far and fast: I imagine the little Duke boiler wouldn't have stood a chance.
     
  16. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-05-18
    帖子:
    6,081
    支持:
    2,217
    yeah. loads odf SOuthern Pacifics around that might donate something
     
  17. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-20
    帖子:
    3,942
    支持:
    1,076
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry, only the GWR are known as the pick and mix crew.
     
  18. michaelh

    michaelh Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-04-29
    帖子:
    3,080
    支持:
    1,291
    性别:
    职业:
    Very comfortably early retired
    所在地:
    1029
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yeah break up a few of the Bulleids - just keep the Jarvis's which have proved to be much better locos
     
  19. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2008-03-08
    帖子:
    28,056
    支持:
    65,713
    所在地:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Opinions vary - I know many people who refer to the Jarvis pacifics as "de-tuned".

    Anyway, isn't this thread supposed to be about some rather ugly GW things?

    Tom
     
  20. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2005-09-13
    帖子:
    12,910
    支持:
    1,387
    性别:
    所在地:
    Birmingham
    Considering some of the things to roll out of Eastleigh, the Southern mob aint really in a position to comment on Asthetics *CoughQ1Cough* :behindsofa:

    Anyway, I digress :focus:
     

分享此页面