If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bulleid Pacifics - Past or Present

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by 34007, May 13, 2008.

  1. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,116
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    IR does have another Bulleid Pacific that he is involved with, namely 34007. I think that may be much more advanced than 35009 which has been on the back burner for some years.

    Peter
     
  2. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    745
    Location:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Doesn't that belong to someone else though? Doesn't seem a likely source of a borrowed tender.
     
  3. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    19,916
    Likes Received:
    13,036
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Regarding tenders, I did hear that 34007 might be exchanging tenders with another of SLL's stable, on account that it has a greater water capacity where as the one thats being worked on at Ropley is of a smaller capacity , SLL has build new tender chassis before, and it wouldn't be that hard to build a new one for 35009, along with a new tank, the wheel castings are availible, .
     
  4. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    745
    Location:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I suppose there's potential for economies of scale as SLL will need to build tenders for Brocklebank, Sidmouth and Sir Fred. Although there again I suppose they could just rotate them as other locos come out of service. Four tenders across seven locos seems manageable.
     
  5. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,116
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    I wasn't referring to tenders or ownership. The topic of this thread is Bulleid Pacifics and IR is currently doing a contract overhaul of 34007. I suggest that he is given time to finish that job before worrying about tenders for 35009. We haven't even had the MN livery discussion yet:).

    Peter
     
    Mick45305 and DismalChips like this.
  6. Mick45305

    Mick45305 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    626
    Location:
    Huddersfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    34007 is receiving 34072’s tender, according to the latest SLL news bulletin. 34072’s current tender has 5,500 gallons, whereas a new-build high-sided tender originally for use on 34007 is 4,500.
     
  7. JMJR1000

    JMJR1000 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    710
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cleethorpes
    Indeed, thus allowing the SLL in turn to fulfil a long held desire to have at least one high-sided tender to pair with one of their two original 'spam cans', which I I have to say does best suit them in my opinion.
     
  8. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    8,693
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I picked up a copy of Colin Boocock's Locos of Nine Elms last week.
    There are 3 appendices listed in the back for loco allocations in 1950,1959 and 1965.
    The thing that interested me was all the Bulleid Light Pacifics allocated in August 1950 were Battle of Britain Class. Was this down to some predetermined strategy by BR to have only the BB's in London and the WC's down in the West Country or pure chance?
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025
    misspentyouth62 likes this.
  9. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    2,628
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A good question although my 1959 Combined Vol has both allocated to 70A including WCs 34006/007/009/010/018/020/029/031/047/093/094/095 with only 3 BoBs 34064/065/090. I'm intrigued.
     
  10. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    8,693
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes my typo I was talking about 1950, your list agrees with his data for 1959.
    I will correct my original post.
     
  11. 30567

    30567 Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,291
    Likes Received:
    4,260
    https://sremg.org.uk/steam/blp-dat.shtml

    Have a look at this, scroll down to the second table. 34001-20 and 34041-7 started out at Exmouth Jn. 34021-32 started at Ramsgate while 34033-40 were at Stewarts Lane.

    In early 1950 according to Shed Bash UK 34022/3 were shedded at Nine Elms. It does look as though all of 34001-48 were outside London for a period in 1950 but from the attachment that didn't last long.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025
  12. alexl102

    alexl102 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2019
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    602
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An update on the Ian Riley’s Facebook page re 35009 today.
    upload_2025-9-4_19-53-16.jpeg Oh
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025
  13. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,987
    Likes Received:
    12,444
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It’s in my memory bank that there’s a subtle difference between BB’s andWC’s with regard to the cabs which gave BB’s a better route availability for use over Brighton & SECR lines. I’m sure Tom or someone else can confirm or say it’s utter rubbish.
     
  14. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    36,119
    Likes Received:
    22,834
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Light Pacifics as built came with 8’ 6” cabs up to 34070 and 9’ cabs from 34071 onwards. Thus both original WCs and BBs came in both 8’6” and 9’ cab versions. All rebuilds had a 9’ cab.
     
    Steve, misspentyouth62, Johnb and 2 others like this.
  15. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,477
    Likes Received:
    5,436
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport
    Could that be because the WC / BB were initially built as a mixed traffic locomotive to replace some of the older life-expired designs - many of which were allocated to depots in the outer edges of the Southern Railway ?
     
  16. gz3xzf

    gz3xzf Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    21C142
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If you want to be really "nerdy" about it you can see all the dates that the WC/BB were built/rebuilt and modified in this comprehensive table from the Bulleid Society: -
    LOCOMOTIVE SUMMARY 'WEST COUNTRY' AND 'BATTLE OF BRITAIN' CLASS
    At Swanage currently there are two original Light Pacific's running 34070 which was the last pacific built with an 8'6" cab and 34072 which was the second built with a 9' cab.
     
  17. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    36,119
    Likes Received:
    22,834
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I forgot to mention that although 34067 had an 8’6” cab throughout its working life, it was fitted with a 9’ cab when it went main line in the preservation era.
     
    gz3xzf likes this.
  18. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    2,628
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Confirming details from my 1950 locoshed now that I've found it : 70A had BoBs 34049-34065 and no WCs allocated at this time. (also MNs 35005 and 35010-35020)

    34067 was at Stewarts Lane in 1950
     
  19. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,116
    Likes Received:
    8,137
    A bit OT but it is Bulleid related - it is good to see that the Q1 is back in one piece and on display in the NRM again 20250902_211209 copy.jpg

    Peter
     
  20. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2017
    Messages:
    3,798
    Likes Received:
    4,352
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Beauty and the beast….
     

Share This Page