If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Lynton and Barnstaple - Operations and Development

Discussion in 'Narrow Gauge Railways' started by 50044 Exeter, Dec 25, 2009.

  1. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2018
    Messages:
    2,696
    Likes Received:
    5,502
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks for the link Chris. Clearly there are some lovely walks around Chelfham.
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  2. Axe +1

    Axe +1 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    726
    Occupation:
    Retired {Electronics Engineer}
    Location:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    ............. but could easily strain the relationship between North Devon Council and the railway.

    In 2002, the Lynton & Barnstaple Railway submitted an application to North Devon Council for planning permission titled "Laying of trackbed of former railway to form private railway at Chelfham Station". The extent of the railway was between the boundary with the Viaduct and the boundary with Valley Cottage. The application was REFUSED for 4 reasons, all of which related to points regarding inadequate road access, increased traffic levels, etc. NDC Planning Application reference 33229 refers.
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  3. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm curious. Given that Chelfham doesn't currently form part of the operational railway and likely won't for a while yet, I wonder why does NDC anticipate worrisome volumes of traffic? Further, when that happy day dawns and Chelfham is selling tickets again, does this ruling imply serious future problems?

    I'm not aware of too many lines where railway-related road traffic, away from the principal point(s) of embarkation, is notoriously heavy.

    As off-the-cuff examples, in the case of the FR, I'd not be surprised to learn last year's footfall at T-y-B had exceeded the total for the entire period since Dduallt reopened in 1968 and feel reasonably safe in saying that, from a revenue point of view, T-y-G may as well not exist. Over on the IWSR, there's been comment a-plenty that passenger numbers originating from the Island Line connection at Smallbrook Jc, or by car/bus at Wootton pale into insignificance when compared with Haven Street.
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  4. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2020
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    1,595
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Which is nice, but the decision is the decision is the decision (unless you want to appeal it).
    Clearly, the railway will need to address this at some point. Presumably best done when it is shown that (a) the area will not be overrun by hordes, and (b) those that come make a positive contribution
     
    H Cloutt and The Dainton Banker like this.
  5. Mark Thompson

    Mark Thompson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    3,562
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    E sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I can understand if permission was being sought to actually run some kind of passenger carrying venture, but in this case, the track would be purely for set-dressing, wouldn't it?
    It would certainly be interesting to know what NDC's position would be regarding tracklaying for non-commercial reasons, and certainly a lot of water has flowed along the Stoke Rivers valley since 2002.
    Anyhow, I'm sure that those on the ground at Chelfham, with their hands actually dirty from the Devon soil will be in a much better position to comment on this.
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  6. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2018
    Messages:
    2,696
    Likes Received:
    5,502
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks Chris for your detailed reply
    - I was just thinking of "Set Dressing" as Mark puts it but certainly would not like to, in any way, upset the relationship with the County Council. I'm sure those on the ground are well aware of these aspects and are making suitable provisions.
     
    johnofwessex and H Cloutt like this.
  7. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Given that the railway is proving a success for the local tourist industry , and the NDCC has its restoration in the relevant Local Plan, it may be that the Counicl's attitude towards a revised application for Chelfham might be more favourable some 19 (!) years later.

    However...I know from my own visits that road access to the station is 'less than ideal' and parking in the immediate vicinity is very limited, so such matters clearly would remain of concern to the local authority. It may be that 'typical' visitor numbers to Chelfham are manageable at the moment, but if/when you were to start to 'ramp up' the attraction by adding (say) a short bit of operational railway and running short brake-van type trips on a number of 'Open Days', then visitors numbers might rise to a level that could give rise to complaints.

    Having said that, if 'expansion' were to be limited to (say) track within the limits of the platforms only and just one or two static exhibits of rolling-stock to add to the recreated 'atmosphere' of the original station, then maybe a more limited application might succeed? Perhaps at least some exploratory discussions could take place with NDCC as/when time and circumstances permit?
     
    35B and H Cloutt like this.
  8. H Cloutt

    H Cloutt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    1,329
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Battle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I was going to post along similar lines but you beat me to it. NDDC have recently approved plan for the replacement of the Timber Lodge at Chelfham which will enable overnight accommodation. So clearly the Trust have things in mind for this site.
     
  9. Meiriongwril

    Meiriongwril Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    694
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cymru
    Surely, the placement of static rolling stock items on a short length of track would not require planning permission? Especially if no charge were levied to enter the site...?
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  10. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Which comes back to my earlier question about what actually needs planning permission and so, by default, what can you do that does not need it?
     
    H Cloutt likes this.
  11. H Cloutt

    H Cloutt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    1,329
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Battle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    To find out for sure there would need to be a conversation with the NDDC planners. It may be that the Trust have already had this conversation, although I suspect that they are busy in finalising the documents for the TWAO application. They have just received planning consent for buildings at both Chelfham and Woody Bay and getting this work started may be their priority at the moment.
     
    ghost likes this.
  12. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Given the situation a better question might be, 'although we don't need planning permission for this, is it a good idea to do it?'
     
    Small Prairie and ghost like this.
  13. MartinBall

    MartinBall Guest

    I can't imagine any planning authority welcoming applications for something that doesn't need permission. Extra work for them and then they'd simply bounce back to the applicant...
     
  14. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm not sure that is what John meant. I think (and stand to be corrected) he meant that if the council refused permission previously, and the work isn't necessary at the minute then maybe it's better to leave things as they are for the meantime. After all, the additional track and/or additional rolling stock is not exactly a priority at this time.
     
    andrewshimmin, Axe +1 and Llwyngwern like this.
  15. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed, more to the point I was concerned that while legal, it might upset that planning authority who you want to be on your side
     
    ross and ghost like this.
  16. Meatman

    Meatman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    1,401
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Burrington,devon
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    a little more progress IMG_20210502_150647.jpg IMG_20210502_150633.jpg
     
  17. Tobbes

    Tobbes Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    2,354
  18. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2018
    Messages:
    2,696
    Likes Received:
    5,502
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks Meatman - will the, eventual,? signal arm be linked to the signal cabin?
     
  19. 2392

    2392 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Felling on Tyne
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Certainly "signals" well for the future meatman. Moving onto the necessity for additional/renewal of the planning permission for re-instating any trackwork, whilst it may not be needed, it IMO wouldn't do any harm to keep the local Authorities in the loop and on side........
     
  20. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    I am sure that the Trust is already doing everything suitable to keep the local authorities 'on side' :)
     
    Mark Thompson likes this.

Share This Page