If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

SVR General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by threelinkdave, Aug 20, 2014.

  1. MattA

    MattA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2014
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    342
    Location:
    82F
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As I'm not privy to such details, could someone give me an idea of the difference in running costs between a DMU and a longer diesel-hauled rake? I only ask because it would seem to me like a full rake would provide more room for social distancing than a DMU.
     
  2. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,031
    Likes Received:
    7,605
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The SVR have quite a few compartment coaches mixed amongst the various rakes, which should be better if there does need to be social distancing when they reopen.
     
  3. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    Isn’t the DMU out of action at the moment or is it up and running again?
     
  4. lostlogin

    lostlogin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    205
    I was advised earlier today elsewhere that if social distancing remains in place then between one "household unit" using a compartment and the next one using it the compartment would have to be deep cleaned. If that is correct then it makes it pretty difficult to operate any sort of service short of pre selling round trip tickets for which your journey cannot be broken and then taking the carriages out to be deep cleaned.
     
  5. mdewell

    mdewell Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,653
    Likes Received:
    2,564
    Occupation:
    UK & Ireland Heritage Railways Webmaster
    Location:
    Ruabon, Wrexham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Only until your passengers meet in the corridor while boarding! Something like a class 117 DMU would at least allow most to have their own door.
    I expect heritage railways won't re-open until it is acceptable for people to mix freely as they did before the crisis (Whether they will want to is of course another question).
    Anything else will be very difficult to enforce (and who is going to enforce any restrictions). Will volunteers want to work in an environment that requires anything less than complete freedom of movement?
     
    JBTEvans likes this.
  6. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    (SVR has class 108s by the way, and not all are serviceable due to bogie work).

    Lots of clever people on here and on heritage railways will be working through different scenarios: compartment stock only, staggered bay seating in opens*, premium pricing, single/double use per day and enhanced cleaning, organised boarding and alighting, branded masks or whatever. Each will throw up bunches of queries to be overcome, or not (what happens if someone wants the toilet, how does Santa interact?) If you can techically do it there are questions of whether it's attractive, whether people would attend, and would it pay?

    I've chosen not to speculate, to hope for the best and expect the worst, to trust those with the unenviable job of working through lots of uncertain scenarios to use their skill and judgement to pick the least bad, and to be thankful I don't have to!

    Patrick

    * I mean this:
    -X
    X-
    -X
    X-
    -X
    X-
    -X
    X-
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  7. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  8. 46118

    46118 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,043
    Likes Received:
    212
    I might be wrong on this, but I think that a shortish section of the line on the approach to Bridgnorth was engineered to double track dimensions due to a proposal for a rail link from Wolverhampton to Bridgnorth, a link that never materialised.

    46118
     
  9. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,327
    Likes Received:
    11,665
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yeah I know about that, you can still see the earthworks by Crossing Cottage.
     
  10. Robin

    Robin Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Location:
    Stourbridge
    The original SVR contract specified that the formation and bridges would be wide enough for double track throughout. Victoria Bridge is wide enough for double track - it is the same width as Albert Edward Bridge. Some parts of the formation may have changed over time of course. The tunnels at Bridgnorth and Burlish were also originally specified as wide enough for double track but were only built as single, so they would have been the only significant problem if the line had been doubled later.
    I am a bit sceptical about those earthworks. They presumably relate to the 20th century GWR proposal but construction began at the far end and only reached Wombourn. There is no mention in histories of that branch of any work being carried out at the Bridgnorth end. Although the route planned suggested a connection somewhere in the Crossing Cottage area, I also wonder why you would route the line across a bridge on the Severn and then climb all the way to the top of Eardington Bank to join the Severn Valley Branch, rather than joining lower down nearer Bridgnorth.

    Sorry, we've hijacked the NYMR thread.
     
    Matt37401 likes this.
  11. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    McAfee doesn't like that site anymore.
    Pat
     
  12. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    Does it block it?

    Patrick
     
  13. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No, it just asks me if I really want to go there. It was fine a couple of weeks ago. (I'm sure that I've had this on another site recently, but blowed if I can remember which one.)
    Pat
     
    D1039 likes this.
  14. Robin

    Robin Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Location:
    Stourbridge
    Still working OK for me (Win 8.1 + McAfee Total Protection v16.0)
     
  15. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    602
    Knowlesands tunnel is double track width. Oldbury viaduct is the same width. The cuttig on the south side of Knowlesands isnt but it widens out as you approach Crossing Cottage. My understanding was the GWR branch was to leave around Eardington station.
    Much further down. Falling sands viaduct is double track width as well. Mount pleasant tunnel, I dont remember being any wider than Bewdley tunnel.
     
  16. Robin

    Robin Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Location:
    Stourbridge
    For purposes of the SVR construction contract Knowlesands was classed as an overbridge, although it is indeed a short tunnel. The two long tunnels were to be 24ft wide per the contract but in the event Mount Pleasant was only 16ft and Bridgnorth 16ft 8in as built. Bewdley tunnel on the loop line was built about 15 years later and was originally 19ft wide before being relined in 1910.

    The first proposals for Wolverhampton to Bridgnorth railways at the time the SVR was being built were to have had connections north of Bridgnorth, so I can't see any reason why the line south of Bridgnorth would have received special consideration. The GWR 1905 Act proposed a 'triangle' junction with a north facing connection 1 mile south of Bridgnorth (a short way south of Knowlesands tunnel) and a south facing connection at 1.5 miles, close to Crossing Cottage. Eardington station itself is about 2.25 miles from Bridgnorth. All info from John Marshall's history.
     
  17. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    And it is also classed as an overbridge rather than a tunnel for most operational purposes.
     
  18. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    The SVR Charitable Trust annual report to June 2019 has been uploaded to the Charity Commission beta website last week. A poignant note is it was signed in March by John Leftwich, who died last month.

    The report shows a single legacy for GWR projects of £503,173 (shown in the notes as restricted for 4930 and/or turntable) plus £447k in unrestricted bequests.

    In all charitable support to the railway was £696k.

    Patrick
     
    JBTEvans likes this.
  19. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    std tank, 240P15 and Forestpines like this.
  20. Sammy B Films

    Sammy B Films New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2020
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    77
    Occupation:
    Video Creator/Budding Filmmaker
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks man!! :-D Well, there is a plan I have for something to be on tv at some point, so stay tuned for that in 2021. ;-) Also, I know it's been over 2 years since replying to this, but I'v only just seen it! Haha! :-D Thanks again!
     
    240P15 likes this.

Share This Page