If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

S&D Railway Trust

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by Andy Norman, Feb 24, 2020.

  1. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It seems
    Spot on, while other lines may be entering choppy waters, the WSR has potentially brewed up its own Perfect Storm
     
    Swan Age likes this.
  2. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A curious affair. If it is continuing for a second year how is it that critics say that it never took place at all in the first year!
    As usual, the facts and statements regarding the WSR are often difficult to equate with what actually happens. That 'lessons have been learned' has been well commented in another post here. More smoke and mirrors?
    Whatever the outcome it seems that the ball is now rolling and there will be questions to answer to the kind of people that, I believe, are not easily fobbed off.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2020
  3. fergusmacg

    fergusmacg Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,573
    Likes Received:
    3,950
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Cumbria
  4. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    As I see it, part of the problem here is the inability of the press, and the world at large, to distinguish one bit of "the WSR" from another.

    AIUI from Andy Norman's comments one body - the WSRA - holds the money and is responsible for spending it, and another body - the PLC - provides the services (ie trains etc) on which that money will be spent. If the latter refuses to facilitate those services, then you can't blame the former for not having spent the money.

    The real questions would seems to be:- (1) has the money actually been spent, and if so then (b) on what ?

    [But maybe all this should be in the other thread?]
     
    jnc and flying scotsman123 like this.
  5. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,735
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Some Llamas, a meerkat and a Donkey for the petting zoo maybe?
     
    johnofwessex likes this.
  6. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,492
    Likes Received:
    23,722
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It should - but I ask why "the press" should need to distinguish between two bodies that are the public face of the WSR.
     
    Miff, jnc and Forestpines like this.
  7. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    When I read the headline I did have to check that it wasn’t Minehead.

    Mass monkey brawl
     
  8. garth manor

    garth manor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    450
    The significant element was presumably the 2 year contract for the employment of the community officer who has the responsibility of organising appropriate outreach, maybe she has formed a view that the family events reported in the journal rather than school trips better meet the objective, employ a professional respect respect their experience ?
     
  9. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,492
    Likes Received:
    23,722
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There's enough stated here to make me suspect that those events were the result of the original plan not being possible; not a free choice
     
  10. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,425
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    But that is surely irrelevant: it was a joint bid for the railway (singular) to deliver an outcome. There are valid structural reasons why behind the scenes it was set up so the association (as a charity) would fund and the plc (as an operator) would deliver the outcome. But the bottom line is did the railway (singular) deliver what they had agreed to do? If they didn't, that's a collective failure.

    Tom
     
  11. Andy Norman

    Andy Norman Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2015
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Swan Age and tracker like this.
  12. OldChap

    OldChap Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    150
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I have scanned through this thread and it seems this whole affair is unfortunate for the WSR and the S&DRT and one that seems to have no winners, except perhaps the various legal teams who are currently or about to engage in court room combat.

    I make no judgment on who is in the wrong here – I, like most people here don’t have all the information – but it doesn’t seem to faviour the S&D Trust as even if they manage to legally enforce the lease on the Washford site their relationship with WSR must be seriously damaged - perhaps not permanently - and must make life ugly for the future, especially for 53808 and its next overhaul which it seems that WSR should perform.

    I hope that they can all amicably sort the issues they have out and can both move along happy, but I fear that at some point either now or after some expensive and protracted legal battle that the S&DRT will move on.

    I have wondered where they could move and set up shop, I can’t think of a railway in the south-south west that has space to spare and surly the trust would struggle to move their museum/stock/infrastructure and buy some appropriate land to develop all at the same time.

    I really hope they can maintain all their stock/artifacts at a single site, I cant see Shillingstone or Midsomer Norton sites able to fit the S&DRT comfortably and wish that the East Somerset, Mid Hants or Swanage Railways could accommodate them if the worst scenario occurs.

    As for me I am joining the S&DRT to show my support.
     
    Swan Age, tracker, 35B and 1 other person like this.
  13. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    From the 10K foot level, it's unfortunate that time & energy has gone into this, as opposed to staying focused on helping the WSR. (Note: I am not saying it shouldn't have been brought up; this is just a general observation.)

    Noel
     
  14. garth manor

    garth manor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    450
    The S&DRT appears to have no interest in any rebirth of the actual line, signing a 50 year lease infers Washford is their comfort zone, rather than a base to prepare restorations for relocation on the line and eventual migration in its entirety.
    So they could relocate to a greenfield site, like Mangapps museum did perhaps, no connection to any existing line required.
    Whether it would be closer to the old S&D line rather depending on the location of the volunteers.
    WSR should in fairness cover the costs of the move and give fair recompense for their extensive site improvements.
     
  15. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    Should this not have been in the general WSR thread? It does not seem relevant to the S&DRT eviction business.
     
    tracker likes this.
  16. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Why?

    The Trust does an excellent job of conserving S&D relics at Washford, where they have local members to support them. The cost of relocation would be high.

    Reinstating a section of the S&D is another story altogether which at least two groups are making some progress on.
     
    Piggy and flying scotsman123 like this.
  17. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,239
    Likes Received:
    5,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport

    Yet another "sleight of hand" methinks; lessons may have been learned BUT have they been applied ?
     
    tracker likes this.
  18. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    This needs unpicking. The SDRT had established a base at Radstock on the old S&D, but was forced to find a new home around 1975, and the WSR PLC offered it a new home at Washford which was then a blank canvass - pretty much a derelict station and empty signal box, and a yard that was once a goods yard that was without rails or buildings.

    The SDRT restored the station and signal box at no cost to the WSR PLC for the last 45 years, and developed the yard into a very attractive amenity, and with adequate covered storage for 3 original S&D coaches, one of which has been superbly restored, and much else besides.

    As far as I can see, and I have no reason to doubt this view whatsoever, the WSR has played upon the SDRT's involvement as one aspect of it's operations and enhancements; recreating part of the S&D, in Somerset, for a considerable time. And the SDRT have developed it's facilities on the back of all this and established a wonderful museum in Washford Station etc. To many of us, the S&D '88' loco is as much a part of the WSR as would be a GWR loco, so intertwined have the 2 organisations been till 10th February 2020 when the 'Notice to Quit' was suddenly served.

    A further new lease of 50 years signed in April 2018 for Washford was with the wholehearted agreement of the WSR PLC at the time, and Ian Coleby signed the new lease as WSR PLC Chairman. It was also never anticipated that the SDRT owned loco '88' would not remain on the WSR or that the WSR PLC would by various means recently depart from the terms of it's separate agreement regarding loco '88'.

    For many, the WSR is a recreation of part of the SDRT, and for 45 years the SDRT has supported the WSR, and until 10th February 2020, the WSR (via the WSR PLC board) have always actively supported the SDRT at Washford. It has been a mutually beneficial arrangement in respect of maintaining Washford at no cost to the WSR PLC (plus paying rent etc) and providing a S&D loco for the line. Indeed last year S&D loco '88' was used quite extensively and on long incoming charter trains.

    S&D loco '88' is now partly dismantled for a piston and valve exam with nothing having been done for quite awhile.

    For years and years the WSR has trading on it's S&D connections via the SDRT and Washford, and that this should all be thrown away on 10th February 2020 potentially, is something that makes me very sad, for an impeccable valued tenant and stakeholder for so many years, as the SDRT has been.

    If JJP doesn't understand all this or get a grasp of it very soon and it's implications for the WSR PLC board, and contested County Court proceedings over it's 'Notice to Quit', and the costs implications, (and the adverse publicity), then hopefully some of his board members might see sense and take a different view.

    Cheers,

    Julian
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2020
  19. Steve Edge

    Steve Edge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2020
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    799
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Ahem. See http://www.wsr.org.uk/pics for evidence of "something being done" on 53808. Do try to look beyond the four grey walls of Nat Pres, folks.

    Steve
     
  20. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Maybe people would be more receptive to the WSR, if people didn't keep attacking NP users. The first part of your post was useful and interesting, the second part less so.

    It is again amusing, someone makes a post attacking the S&D, there is a response from Julian refuting it, and then an aggrieved response from someone about picking up one point to complain about how unfair everyone is being to the WSR. (Ignoring the rest of Julian's post)
     
    Forestpines, Bluenosejohn and Miff like this.

Share This Page