If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

GCR Ending of Lineside Passes, ex-Bridge that Gap: Great Central Railway News

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by LMarsh1987, Nov 26, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In the days of regular steam on BR, only a few lineside permits were issued to recognised photographers, and you certainly couldn't pay a tenner and then gain the right to walk all over the place in an orange jacket taking photos and spoiling other people's photos. It only takes some idiot to get run over and steam will be in jeopardy. I'd scrap all lineside permits and only the railway's publicity department would have access to the lineside for photography. There are plenty of photos that you can take from bridges and platforms. Station shops usually sell perfectly good postcards! I would ban orange jackets being worn by anyone on railway premises except staff working on the track. Thank goodness I'm unlikely to be elected as a dictator!
     
  2. Drop_Shunt

    Drop_Shunt New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    74
    On what basis do you believe that a lineside photographer has a right to access the GCR’s infrastructure ?
     
    jnc and nanstallon like this.
  3. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,634
    Likes Received:
    8,302
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    as I said at the beginning the sense of entitlement of a minority of so called enthusiasts has brought this upon themselves. This post just proves my point
     
  4. Hampshire Unit

    Hampshire Unit Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,837
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Carer, Gardener
    Location:
    Alresford
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Often taken by lineside photograpers and/or working volunteers!:)
     
    Johnb and flying scotsman123 like this.
  5. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Agreed, and it's a privilege that is conferred by the railway (for a fee) who are not obliged to do so, and if they wish to forego the fees paid for whatever reason then that is up to them.

    I'm struck by the similarity between cyclists and photographers: most behave reasonably and thoughtfully, but there are a few of each who attitudes of rights and entitlements give the rest a bad name (and frequently get in other people's way).

    Steve B
     
  6. CH 19

    CH 19 Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    632
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    W14
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Spot on there :)
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  7. 46236

    46236 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    lord of the manor
    Location:
    city of gold
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    just proves that the operators are 'just playing trains'
     
  8. bantam61668

    bantam61668 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    43
    If that is a direct quote and the GCR management feel that I, amongst others am disloyal I shall be taking my £35 refund on my line side pass and donating it to an alternative preservation group who might appreciate my support rather than donating it to the David Clarke Railway Trust as they suggested I might want to.
    I also won’t be renewing my membership next year or visiting again for the foreseeable future, how to alienate your supporters.....

    With a proper statement and better communication this could all have been handled without any ill feeling. As I stated previously if the decision is purely down to safety and insurance then they have done the right thing and have no problem with that, how the management have communicated it is where they have failed and have really shot themselves in the foot on this issue
     
    Johnb and David likes trains like this.
  9. NeilL

    NeilL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Occupation:
    Retired & OAPWay & tree feller
    Location:
    Staffordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If I am out working on PWay, particularly in winter, my clothing will suit weather but will certainly include hi-vis trousers and jacket. If work takes us through a station (like today) I suspect that the Santa Train visitors would prefer to see me with trousers on.
     
    oddsocks, TseTT, Romsey and 3 others like this.
  10. michaelh

    michaelh Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    1,291
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Very comfortably early retired
    Location:
    1029
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    Nonsense
     
    nanstallon likes this.
  11. Hampshire Unit

    Hampshire Unit Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,837
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Carer, Gardener
    Location:
    Alresford
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Re Hi Vis- as above complete removal of Hi Vis is not always easy if you have been working trackside - in winter I prefer to wear a hi viz waterproof work coat rather than just a slip on orange vest over a "normal" coat. I do have a reversible hiz fleece which means I can look less orange in stations without getting too cold/wet
     
    Jamessquared likes this.
  12. Drop_Shunt

    Drop_Shunt New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    74
    In what way ?
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  13. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    6,074
    Likes Received:
    4,889
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I have never had a pass there so I am not affected but I must admit it appears the way this change has been handled was not the best from a PR perspective if you are an organisation that relies to a large extent on donations in one form or another.
    Maybe the GCR use the same agency as the RMT who seem masters at the "own goal" press release and ignoring its subsequent fall out.
     
    Landshrew, RalphW and 60017 like this.
  14. I am sure that the tiny minority - probably in single figures - of those who are chucking their toys out of their prams about their sense of entitlement being dented and how the GCR has somehow done this 'wrong' will be vastly outweighed by everyone else who either isn't aware or isn't bothered by the issue. And, as others have said, by those who are rather relieved that the hi-viz mushrooms which sprout at the lineside during every gala will have been harvested.

    Given today's litigation-happy, blame-anyone-except-oneself-when-things-go-wrong society, I'd be far more inclined to just be grateful to the GCR that it lasted for as long as it did.

    ... the vast majority of which no doubt don't come from those who have purchased lineside passes.

    Probably best not to feed the troll.
     
  15. forty

    forty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    166
    Location:
    Lancashire
    What can a railway actually do to enforce removal if you are challenged for being unauthorised line side?

    Obviously you could be ask to move on but what if someone was belligerent enough to initially refuse to do so. I've seen it happen!!

    Call the police - would they really respond?
     
  16. Drop_Shunt

    Drop_Shunt New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    74
    The County force certainly will respond to trespass incidents on the GCR, and in my personal experience have. We have even had the BTP out before (although not strictly their problem, I think they were interested enough to take a look).

    A trespasser commits a criminal offence if, having been asked by a member of staff, they refuse to leave, or if they subsequently return (although subsequent legislation means an offence is committed immediately the trespass occurs, if the railway has publicly displayed notices forbidding trespass at the nearest station (all GC stations have such a notice displayed). In practice a member of staff meeting a refusal to quit should try to obtain evidence of the offenders identity (easier these days with everyone having a phone in their pocket) and report the details of the offence to the duty traffic manager, who will organise for the Police, or if they cannot respond in time, to pass the offenders identity to the Police for subsequent action.

    Even if the request for a name and address is refused, I would imagine that the photograph of the guilty party should produce results if shared around with a request for same. The railway photographic community is not that big, and anyone that belligerent will be bound to have annoyed one or more of their peers sufficiently enough for them to bubble them.

    Of course, if the photographer is posing a risk to himself or others, then it may be necessary to stop traffic in the area, which would rather obviate their reason for trespass in the first place . . .
     
  17. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    This from our chairman was circulated in a volunteer newsletter for the GWSR today, it seemed relevant to this discussion so hopefully folk won't mind me posting it here:

    "One issue which has understandably caused considerable disappointment, is our decision to stop the issue of lineside photographic passes. The original decision was taken following a ROGS safety audit we arranged to have early in the year. It was strongly recommended then that we withdraw the passes for safety reasons. After receiving a number of heartfelt pleas from various people, we considered the matter again in detail during the year and tried to work out a system which would allow us to maintain all necessary safety procedures whilst allowing unlimited access to photographers. In subsequent discussion with the ORR, we were put on the spot and asked why we were considering reintroducing the passes, when they were such an obvious potential safety risk. It was explained to us in no uncertain terms that the ORR would not look at all kindly on any attempt by us to continue to issue such passes. So, regretfully we have had no option but to maintain our original decision. I hope you understand why we have been obliged to make it. I am very sorry if you feel aggrieved by this necessary decision. There are still a huge number of vantage points to photograph our trains from, without having to go lineside."

    Surely the only question one can ask after that is to wonder how other heritage railways can continue to issue lineside passes, and how long it will last. I must admit I feel a lot more comfortable with the decision now that a few other railways have had to follow suit and we've had this message as well, as I and others were just as disappointed on the GWSR as folk are here.
     
    Sheff, staffordian, Fred Kerr and 5 others like this.
  18. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes,safety must be paramount. I would gladly disclose the identity of a belligerent trespasser, because trains can do serious damage to people, and we don't want to give the killjoys any ammunition.
     
  19. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,315
    Likes Received:
    16,390
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No doubt the nanny state will catch up with them eventually. The aim seems to be to make life so safe it won't be worth living
     
    Landshrew and jnc like this.
  20. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Even those who attitude seems to be if a photographer gets run over, it is their own stupid fault must concede that the physiological effect on the crew would be devastating and, although there is every chance they would suffer real and intense feelings of guilt, the reality is it would almost certainly not be the crews' fault in any way - it can't 'serve them right'.

    I am amazed that a double track mainline, where risks are considerably greater than on a single track (where they are great enough) appears to have continued to issue passes on application and payment of a fee, and pretty much without limit as to numbers, and without any training. I am not surprised that they are now ceasing to do so.

    Failure to appreciate the risks and manage access to the lineside properly is exactly the sort if 'blind spot' that makes many in the 'Big Railway' shake their heads at the preservation movement and conclude it is a 'bunch of puffer-nutters playing trains'.

    Steven
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page