If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

TOPs number etc ex British India Line thread.

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Fred Kerr, Aug 7, 2017.

  1. The Black Hat

    The Black Hat Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    399
    Occupation:
    Defender of the Faith
    Location:
    51F
    Mallard does have a Tops No. as it has been dragged on the network and needs one to be dead in train.
     
  2. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
  3. 6024KEI

    6024KEI Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    472
    Location:
    Bath
    Interesting that 813 (based at SVR) is on neither list but has been dragged in and out of Didcot a few times (most recently this week).
     
  4. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Did the Railmotor have to have a TOPS number when it was towed from Didcot Railway Centre to Didcot LIP the first time? Ie when it went to Llangollen?
     
  5. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    The Railmotor presumably would have needed one for the Brentford branch regardless of any special arrangements for Didcot.

    Going back to diesels briefly, I remembered that 'peak' D123 / 45125 had an 89xxx number when it arrived at the GCR (having moved part of the way by rail) so I looked this up, it was 89423. So they based the TOPS number on the D number and not the former TOPS number. Is that unusual? (And what's wrong with the BR-era TOPS numbers for all of these preserved diesels, anyway?)
     
  6. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Heritage traction (both steam and diesel) are limited to 15,000 miles, I think it's something to do with that.
     
  7. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  8. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Looking at the list the ivatt flying pig is down as 98406, So when 31806 goes mainline, will she take the ivatts tops number, or become 98407? im assuming an Rebuilt river is 4p3f, or is it a 3p 4f?
     
  9. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,618
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired SPM
    Location:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have just checked a list taken from TOPS earlier this year.
    31806 = 98406
    43106 not listed

    Cheers, Neil
     
  10. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,239
    Likes Received:
    5,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport
    43106 therefore not main-line certified hence could be interesting if moving as visitor to another line. I presume the cost of TOPS certification helps budgeting towards road transport for such moves.
     
  11. This begs the question... when the AC Loco Group finishes returning 89001 to working order, will its 'official' TOPS number be... 89001?
     
  12. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,239
    Likes Received:
    5,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport
    Nope; the "0" representing Power Classification will be replaced by whatever the RSL (Rolling Stock Library) deigns 5850 hp to represent; its number will therefore be 89N01 where "N" represents the allocated Power Classification.

    An alternative is to use the Tractive Effort as the basis with 89001 producing 40100 lb. Whilst a Standard 9F produces 39670 lb to be in Power Classification 9, a Stanier "Duchess" produces 40000 lb to be in Power Classification 8 hence "Avocet might end up with the official TOPS number 89901
     
  13. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    15,000 miles? in what respect?
     
  14. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    From what I understand what's classed as 'Heritage' traction (steam and diesels like the Deltics, D1015 etc) are limited to 15,000 miles travel each year on the national network. I'm unsure exactly why, but I think the roots of it go back to the late '90s when D9000 was being used by Virgin and Anglia.
     
  15. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    Not aware of that, some steam locos used intensively must get quite close to that limit?
     
  16. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I can't remember which loco it was, I think it was 60163, did something like 12,000 odd mainline miles a few years ago. But as one mag editor said some time ago 'if it's good enough for the mainline, why artificially limit it to 15k'
     
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,431
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm sure when I spoke to one of the guys on Flying Scotsman earlier this year he mentioned having done a higher number than 15,000 in the last year - though conceivably not in a calendar year. (I may have misremembered, of course...). It's easy to see how the mileage for some locos stacks up if you add in the positioning moves as well as the revenue-earning trips.

    Tom
     
  18. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I believe that this limit is imposed on heritage traction (of all types) because they are not kept up-to-date with all the latest requirements and operate under various derogations to enable this to happen. Failing to update stock and keep them operational with derogations is not what is wanted. Happy to be told that's rubbish, though.
     
  19. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That sounds about right to me.
     
  20. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    Presumably the data is recorded by the OTMR equipment otherwise it would be difficult to audit/enforce?
     

Share This Page