If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Current and Proposed New-Builds

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by aron33, Aug 15, 2017.

  1. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    and then a J39... and then W1 in hush-hush form ;)

    But then there is always the tension between 'practical' and 'historically significant' (ie an 0-6-0 freight loco was the dominant engine type for the majority steam on British railways and yet very few have survived through to preservation - and they are slightly underpowered for many lines)
     
    jnc and 30854 like this.
  2. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    the Hush Hush version of the W1 is really in the realms of fantasy
     
  3. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Winky face clearly indicates that the suggestion was not serious.
     
  4. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry I missed that. There was once a serious suggestion on another thread.
     
    Monkey Magic likes this.
  5. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2020
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    1,595
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What, and take away support from the U1 project!!?
    ;)
     
    240P15, 69530, 5944 and 5 others like this.
  6. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2020
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    1,595
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think we are agreeing - I just elided all the detail into "getting it built".

    Absolutely agree there is a heck of a lot of "back office" stuff and know-how needed. And that trumps any logic.

    IMO, if, eg the a new group or a group that hadn't got one launched decided to build a 3MT, and the A1SLT said they were going to build a P1, I know which I back to get built first.
     
  7. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    Surely the reason for putting a smaller boiler on a (more or less) Britannia chassis was to reduce the weight and so improve the route availability, while keeping the wide firebox to cope with poor coal (as originally intended even down to Class 5). That was a perfectly valid design objective. If greater numbers had been built, any teething troubles had been resolved, and operating departments had sorted out the duties that they were most suitable for, they would probably have been as successful as any other standard class.
     
    andrewshimmin, 69530, ross and 3 others like this.
  8. gwralatea

    gwralatea Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    929
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    and their regular crews liked them - it was the ones who kept trying to use them as Class 7s that got frustrated.

    In terms of the project, I'm a member, I really want to see one, they're my all-time favourite locomotive, but I do veer wildly in my head rather than my heart as to whether it will happen or not. In the meantime, I'll keep handing over what I can, and crossing my fingers. FWIW I think the project is currently on one of its periodic upswings/more hopeful passages.
     
    andrewshimmin, Sheff and jnc like this.
  9. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Point of order: Every new build, without exception, is pure fantasy, right up to the point it isn't.

    AIUI, the biggest single issue with the original W1 was the inability to render the water tube boiler casing airtight. If that's not a juicy bone to dangle in front of those who would, given half a chance, follow in Sir Nigel's footsteps, I don't know what is ...... though it has to be conceded the modern loading gauge might throw up more challenges than for most designs and AFAIK, no-one's yet been crazy enough sufficiently emboldened to produce a 5" gauge edition of the Yarrow boiler.

    And no, that doesn't constitute a proposal, serious or otherwise!
     
    Gav106 and jnc like this.
  10. 2392

    2392 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Felling on Tyne
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Out of interest the original water tube boiler off 10,000 hush hush, outlasted the rest of the locomotive, which was AIUI withdrawn about 1960 by a few years. As when the loco was rebuilt with the more conventional boiler the original was sent/ended up at North Road Works [Darlington] as a stationary boiler supplying steam/hot water to the works, until it closed in 1965-6. Whilst the water tube boiler worked fine as a stationary or ships boiler,they weren't so good on a railway locomotive.No doubt due to the way railway locos twisted, bounced and jolted about as they ran.
     
    LMS2968, 30854 and jnc like this.
  11. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    And very welcome I find that approach; the 'experiment' of building a 'tweaked' P2 (which is surely what it is, as well as just 'jolly good fun') will provide useful new, empirical data to those who are interested in the question of the P2's problems, and find the existing historical records insufficiently rich to answer some questions as to cause, etc.

    Noel
     
    Hirn, 69530 and 30854 like this.
  12. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    If you read the test reports, once the issue of inadequate steam supply to the auxiliary fittings had been addressed, the biggest issue was that no one actually drove the engine in the correct manner.

    The steam supply issue was a peculiar oversight and it plagued the testing and development of the engine for far too long. How do you conduct testing on a locomotive when you cannot obtain either a sufficient or reliable feed of water into the boiler? You don't; you have to solve the water feed issue first. It was a report produced by J. N. Gresham on 12th February 1931 which pointed out the issue as G. & C identified it and they advised that a 1.5" steam pipe be used for a Number 9 injector and a 1.25" for a combination Ejector. And further allowance had to be made for other auxiliaries. It would be April 1932 before attention could be given to the model of the flue working, associated baffles and the flue casing. The engine had gone through more than a year of serious abuse and gone through an estimated 10 years of thermal cycling due to the failure of the auxiliary steam supply. The boiler behaved rather well and continued to be used until 1965 at Stooperdale. The company were well aware that the "casing" design needed to be developed further but they just didn't have the time and other locomotive developments were taking place rather quickly.

    If the LNER had been able to build more than one prototype the development work would have been conducted at a far greater pace, this was something that Gresley learned at Crewe under Webb but the LNER could not indulge Gresley in the same way that the LNWR could afford to with FWW.
     
    jnc likes this.
  13. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    I don't believe that any steam locomotive was subjected to the movement of a Tribal class destroyer working at full power on the highest of seas.
     
    paullad1984 and ross like this.
  14. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    While that is undoubtedly true as to the distance moved, it would have been far less pronounced and involved lower acceleration rates than that of a locomotive running at speed on jointed track.
     
    andrewshimmin, jnc and 2392 like this.
  15. 2392

    2392 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Felling on Tyne
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Which is the point I was driving at. The "motion" of a railway locomotive on the move is totally different to that of a ship sailing in heavy weather.
     
  16. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Without wishing to turn this into a long debate on the W1 - but William Brown's book on the W1, being what I consider the "authority" on the loco - the boiler wasn't an issue particularly. Its ability to boil water sufficiently and reliably has never been in doubt. The ancillaries across the boiler were the biggest issue: the W1 as built and when fitted with the double kylchap by Bulleid and Thompson was a very potent machine.

    The whole approach of the locomotive's design was about producing an A1 comparable locomotive that was economically and more thermally efficient; it succeeded in this at the end of its life, but arguably too late compared to the A4s which were by then on the scene. Its rebuilding to A4 like standard produced a highly capable and more "standard" locomotive. Losing the original was a real shame however. I personally think it was one of Gresley experiment's that was so, so very close to being there. The question asked of it though - which was better - a much refined A1 (as an A4) that was simpler to build, or the more complicated W1 design?
     
    2392 likes this.
  17. Sheff

    Sheff Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,568
    Likes Received:
    2,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Engineer & Heritage Volunteer
    Location:
    N Warks
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have to confess a grievous sin.

    A few years back, when there was another outbreak of U1 fever, I couldn’t resist setting up a ‘fan group’ on FB, with the stated aim of recreating the beast

    Well they were queuing around the block, but after a couple of days I took pity and closed it down, before it got too far out of hand


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
    Bikermike, LMS2968 and 30854 like this.
  18. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Only one way to find out ;) An evidence based approach using real world data. We've got one half of the test built, just need the other half.
     
    jnc likes this.
  19. 2392

    2392 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Felling on Tyne
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Of course the A1SLT could build a W1 as per the original today and in a few years time rebuild it with a conventional boiler and use the original water tube boiler in their proposed "New" Darlington works:Saywhat::Googleit::Morewaitingisrequired::Resistanceisfutile:!
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2021
    MellishR, Sheff, jnc and 1 other person like this.
  20. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If the P2 doesn't work, it can always be rebuilt as a Pacific anyway........
     
    Jamessquared and jnc like this.

Share This Page