If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Betton Grange

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Broomhalla, Feb 22, 2009.

  1. Barry Buckley

    Barry Buckley New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2014
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    27
    Unfortunately I think it’s quite a complicated situation. As is often the case the poorly worded article from RailAdvent does not help.

    I believe there was an agreement for restoration/hire of the tender between the owner of 3814 and the 6880 group. The 6880 group were doing much of the work on 3814’s tender and they were subcontracting parts to Llangollen Engineering. Many of the same individuals who are running the grange group were involved at high levels on the previous (to October 2020) Llangollen plc board. This basically led them to be unable to complete the tender. Hope that sort of makes sense.
     
    JBTEvans likes this.
  2. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,735
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thanks, that makes more sense, albeit I am still not sure why the Grange Group cannot just get another tender on short term hire whilst the issues with 3814/Llangollen Engineering etc are sorted one way or the other.
     
    MattA and flying scotsman123 like this.
  3. Barry Buckley

    Barry Buckley New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2014
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    27
    Yes that might be what the group will have to do in the short term. Although unless I’ve missed it, I don’t believe 6880 have made any recent statements about their tender situation so for all we know they might already have the situation under control from their point of view. I think the RailAdvent article was purely based on a very short Facebook page by 3814’s owner.

    Again I think it’s worth stressing that as far as I’m aware their wasn’t any agreement between the owner of 3814 and Llangollen with regards to work on the tender. It might be that the onus will be on 6880 group to sort out the dispute with regards to what work still needs to be done on 3814’s tender...
     
    GWR4707 likes this.
  4. ccbysh

    ccbysh New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2021
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Seems as though those who were in charge of Llangollen and are also still in charge of the Grange group have now truly decided to jump ship... 6880 letter.jpg
     
    jnc likes this.
  5. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They might not have had any other option. With the receivership, it's unclear what's going to happen to the space. (Not that the PLC owned the building, it's my vague recollection that they don't; but they might have a lease which could in theory be an asset.) At the very least, regular access for working might have been impractical.

    Sad to see the end of the connection, though.

    Noel
     
  6. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,729
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    And if the Betton Grange group were led by the pre-October regime at Llangollen, I can imagine that relationships may be strained.
     
  7. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,032
    Likes Received:
    7,606
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Same people involved with 5199, so doubt that will be returning either.
     
  8. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,735
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Where do they actually plan to run her, steaming fees at Tyseley will be limited to mainline and I assume much as with Hall's there will be quite serious restrictions as to where she will fit on the mainline?
     
    26D_M and std tank like this.
  9. Will RL

    Will RL Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    1,060
    Location:
    Midlands
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    An operation such the same as 7752 would work well. Based at Tyseley, currently without a mainline ticket but has spent a significant amount of time in the west.
     
  10. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    7752 does not have outside cylinders to worry about.
     
    26D_M likes this.
  11. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    No, but it wouldn’t be an issue either where 7752 has been running the last few years down at Dartmouth and then West Somerset.
     
    Paul42 and Will RL like this.
  12. ruddingtonrsh56

    ruddingtonrsh56 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Nottinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If 6880 is to be mainly based on preserved railways I don't think that would be an issue. Lots of the lines that would probably be interested in having her for a visit have had a Hall to visit at some point in the past, and so provided they haven't changed their P-way to reduce width or height a Grange should fit!
     
    jnc likes this.
  13. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The ORR generally expect heritage railways to comply with RSP5 and this document still has the old structure gauge that was a requirement on the big railway for many years so standard gauge heritage railways are likely to be able to accommodate a Grange without any problem unless it is a historical one.
     
    Richard Roper likes this.
  14. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    One suspects the engine will be a roving engine for hire with maintenance taking place at tyseley. Whether we may see a mainline grange remains to be seen but a Shakespeare express with 6880 at the front would be a very tempting proposition
     
  15. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Exeter-Plymouth would tempt me.
     
  16. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well, if there's any set up that will know where on the bug railway a GWR 4-6-0 with two big outside cylinders will and won't fit, it has to be Tyseley. Sadly, the "won't fit" routes are likely to outnumber the "will fit" lines, but hopefully there will be enough of the latter for 6880 to have a few more main line options besides just the North Warwickshire line.
     
  17. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    602
    Along with Sidmouth. I would be thinking along the lines of Tyseley will be its engineering base and it spends a season hired to a railway and then a possible return for periodical maintenance. There by getting the best of both worlds. A consistent income from hire fees to railways and an expert knowledge base for the maintenance and overhaul.
     
    jnc likes this.
  18. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Penistone to Huddersfield is definitely no go (6858).
     
    John Petley and Matt37401 like this.
  19. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Via Dawlish, or via Okehampton? :)
     
    MellishR likes this.
  20. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Am I correct in my understanding that 6880 Group also own 5952 Cogan Hall and it's tender? If so, do we know if it is scheduled to be relocated given the current situation at Llangollen?
     

Share This Page