If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,494
    Likes Received:
    23,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I could as easily say that they don’t add up because you don’t want them to. I’m just doing a compare and contrast, and drawing conclusions from the progression. Time will tell; I hope I’m right if only because the WSR deserves better than to be the focus of attention for its (mis)governance.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    JBTEvans, jnc and Monkey Magic like this.
  2. John Palmer

    John Palmer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    678
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    These are my views as an individual member of the S&DRT:

    As more than six months have now elapsed since the Notice to Quit was served, it is possible that the S&DRT has already committed itself to relocation arrangements it is now unable to reverse. Alternatively, its board may have already decided that, come what may in the negotiations currently taking place, the conduct of the WSR plc has been such that it does not wish to entertain any continuing relationship with that company. In either of these cases withdrawal of the Notice to Quit would be meaningless. Service of that Notice had certain irrevocable consequences. Amongst these, the plc cannot, by simply withdrawing the Notice, compel the S&DRT to be a continuing tenant of the Washford site. If it so chooses, the Trust is now free to proceed on the footing that its right to occupy the Washford site is coming to an end and that it is entitled at the very least to payment from the plc of modest statutory compensation for the loss of its tenancy. That entitlement is completely distinct from any remedy in damages to which the Trust may be entitled for breach of the 2018 agreement that was intended to extend the Trust's lease of the Washford site until 2070.

    The WSR plc's latest communiques suggest a dawning recognition that 53808 is particularly well suited to the railway as a unit of motive power, and that the plc is consequently anxious to retain its services. If the Trust leaves the West Somerset Railway as a result of the eviction process set in motion by the plc in February then it would not be appropriate for the locomotive to remain on that Railway for one moment longer than is required by the current agreement for its use. Furthermore, in such a case I would wish the S&DRT board to hold the plc strictly to its contractual obligations as regards the locomotive's upkeep, and be alert for any opportunity to treat a shortfall in the performance of those obligations as one entitling the Trust to repudiate the agreement and bring to an end the locomotive's further use on the Railway.

    If the S&DRT board shares my sentiments and if the plc really does want 53808 to continue to work the line then the company ought to be giving serious thought to how it can mend its relationship with the Trust. The plc would need to recognise that its previous actions have forfeited such trust and goodwill as may have existed before the 'cuckoo in the nest' jibe and service of the Notice to Quit. So the S&DRT should now make it clear that if its locomotive is to continue in long term service on the WSR then the Trust must be allowed, if it wishes, to remain at Washford. Should the Trust be agreeable to continuing its occupation of the site then an appropriate course would be for both parties to re-affirm formally their intention to uphold the terms of the bargain between them recorded in the 2018 agreement. Further, should it transpire that there was some legal defect in the arrangements made to extend the Trust's lease then both parties should commit themselves to taking whatever steps are required to rectify that defect.
     
  3. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,667
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    John this is put far more eloquently than I could, I’m very much reminded of Khrushchev and his ‘there might be 1 finger on the trigger but 15 on the safety catch’ quote.
    I really hope that there’s someone somewhere who’s flipped that switch to ‘on’ in Minehead and maybe having a little word along the lines of ‘you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone’
    There’s so many people who have been disgusted with the PLCs actions, that might affect the WSR’s future and have voiced their opinion, and we can’t all be wrong can we?
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2020
  4. Cuckoo Line

    Cuckoo Line Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2020
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    300
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Have now been on KESR, non-compartment seat and SVR where you get a compartment all day and both good if different experiences. The message coming over is we need to run to show we still exist, keep our volunteers, keep things running and hopefully break even. SCR seem quite into people spending extra in shop etc to make some cash. I think they also both recognise that things deteriorate quicker if not used, you need to keep people current and they enjoy operating ! Looks like also some lines are expecting to cash in on Christmas trains which seem to be filling fast.
     
  5. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Trouble is it is only nat pres on which there is real dissent against the actions and decisions taken by the plc . Elsewhere the views are largely held in contempt

    My growing inclination is to leave them to it , the saga needs to run its course
     
  6. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I agree, time will tell, But I remain suspicious of the motives of a board member who it was reported by another poster on here as floating to others the possibility of buying out the PLC,shareholding, and assets, should the railway become unable to trade and had to enter receivership , and then appear to do very little in the way of revenue earning during a time when other railways are finding ways to stay open and earn revenue.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2020
    MellishR and granmaree like this.
  7. Snifter

    Snifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    4,210
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Is that record in the public domain ? While many see it as the only feasible explanation for the string of events and actions, I think an individual has been very keen to keep things under wraps such as approaching the council to enquire about the freehold.
     
  8. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It's not "on the record" no. It had been reported as the case on this forum, but that is all.
     
  9. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Enjoyed by visut to washford for the SDRT open day. Non member! But what a great museum and site. Would be a sad lost to the railway it leaves.
     
  10. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    Every answer raises more questions.

    To the "one WSR fundraising" agenda the plc has just added raising £228k, in addition to the other imperatives of rebuilding the cash pile and £500k a year on the formation. It may also have site costs at Dunster and/or Watchet in that time. Presumably this will come before fundraising for other projects, such as the WSRA manor.

    My inference is that the S&D will hold the loco hire funds to 2022, to be added to any other contribution it agrees to meet (the tender tank?) and the £228k the plc has said it will raise. It seems at the bottom of the £300k plus range but that's my conjecture.

    The Machiavelli in me thinks that a delayed and slower overhaul, complete nearer 2030, would maximise the S&D's opportunities should they decide to base it elsewhere after the agreement ends (more years on ticket).

    Patrick
     
    ghost likes this.
  11. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Which is why I previously suggested that anyone doing a contract with the PLC insist on the inclusion of a liquidated damages clause in said contract, which would be activated should the PLC unilaterally terminate the contract. As long as they don't do that, it won't cost them a penny.

    Noel
     
  12. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I don't think so; I think they are probably carefully treading a very measured path, one which which is focused on the long-term goals of the SDRT. Keeping the loco on the WSR is likely part of that (leverage to get the SDRT things it wants); if it stays, it will need money (from somewhere) for its restoration. We'll have to wait for the other pieces of the picture, to see if this overall perception is confirmed.

    Noel
     
    mdewell likes this.
  13. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite. Nobody likes being treated as a fool.
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  14. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'd go further and require that funds be lodged year by year with a trusted stakeholder.
     
    jnc likes this.
  15. JBTEvans

    JBTEvans Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,344
    Likes Received:
    673
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Casnewydd, De Cymru
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Swanage is 5 miles long though. They can run several services a day. The WSR is 2 round trips max when it's all systems go. If you build in people stopping over in Minehead etc that soon becomes an early start or late finish whichever trip you go on which is unattractive to a casual visitor, or one round trip only which they must believe isn't viable, plus it seems they permanent way isn't up to carrying passengers at the moment anyway.
     
  16. JBTEvans

    JBTEvans Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,344
    Likes Received:
    673
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Casnewydd, De Cymru
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So basically blackmail the WSR plc with 53808?
     
  17. JBTEvans

    JBTEvans Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,344
    Likes Received:
    673
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Casnewydd, De Cymru
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So maybe VoR should be running diesel as well then? Brecon Mountain? Bodmin?

    Every heritage railway is different.

    WSR is a premier league line. The Norton triangle proves they can think outside of the box.

    I think the Seaward Way level crossing is a big barrier, no pun intended, to operating any service in and out of their main station - where the majority of stock is.
     
  18. Paulthehitch

    Paulthehitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2020
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hayling Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Only if it runs a service. Otherwise it is just a pub team which cannot field eleven players.
     
  19. JBTEvans

    JBTEvans Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,344
    Likes Received:
    673
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Casnewydd, De Cymru
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Maybe it's a sleeping giant ready to make a big come back.
     
  20. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I will agree it is a sleeping giant. It is sadly not ready to make a big comeback. The longer it puts it off the harder it will be to get going again.
     

Share This Page