If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Liveries!

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by 61624, Jan 17, 2018.

  1. RLinkinS

    RLinkinS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    928
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The GWR taper boiler 4-4-0s had over 20sq ft as did the NER R class. The SECR E class was 21sq ft

    Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk
     
  2. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,160
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, I found the R class just after I posted!
    Just goes to show you need to be thorough in these matters... Mea culpa!
    Nevertheless, the Webb 2-2-2-0 long preceded these classes, and had a large grate for its time. Webb thought this could only achieved without coupling the wheels. He was wrong, but it was quite a conventional opinion at the time.

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
     
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Drummond 4-4-0s / 4-2-2-0s present a very clear series of how firebox size, grate area and heating surface are constrained by wheel spacing:

    C8 (1898)
    Wheelbase: 9'0"
    Driving wheel diameter: 6'7"
    Firebox length: 6'4"
    Grate area: 20.4 sq ft
    Firebox heating surface: 124 sq ft

    T9 (1899)
    Wheelbase: 10'0"
    Driving wheel diameter: 6'7"
    Firebox length: 7'4"
    Grate area: 24 sq ft
    Firebox heating surface: 143 sq ft

    E10 (1901)
    Wheelbase: 11'0"
    Driving wheel diameter: 6'7"
    Firebox length: 8'4"
    Grate area: 27.4 sq ft
    Firebox heating surface: 156 sq ft

    All three had the same wheel diameter and essentially similar boilers: every foot of extra length between driving wheels added a foot of firebox length, 3.5 sq ft of grate area and around 15sq foot of heating surface; but by time you got to to the E10, the driving wheels were uncoupled. The C8s were already under-boilered even when new.

    Tom
     
    Steve likes this.
  4. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think it was Patrick Stirling who said, an express loco with coupled wheels was like a man trying Run with his breaches down.
     
    Richard Roper likes this.
  5. Richard Roper

    Richard Roper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Librarian
    Location:
    Just up the road from 56E Sowerby Bridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It was indeed, and what a brilliant description! And that was in the days of inside valvegear! What would he have made of a Schools?!

    Richard.
     
    Johnb likes this.
  6. bluetrain

    bluetrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wiltshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In the Victorian era, Stroudley and Drummond were also notable proponents of large fireboxes and grates. Drummond's NBR "Abbotsford" class 4-4-0 had a grate area of 21 sq ft, very large and heavy engines for 1876. That came down to 19.5 sq ft in Drummond's Caledonian 66-class, even though that class was in most respects an "Abbotsford" clone - not sure whether that was due to altered firebox water spaces or simply the wish to standardize the boiler with the "Jumbo" (294-class) 0-6-0.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  7. 8126

    8126 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    962
    Gender:
    Male
    Even with perfect geometry you can get some surprising results if you model it numerically rather than purely analytically. When I was a young undergrad I was introduced to 3D CAD and motion modelling software. Being the fan of modern technology that I am, I promptly set to modelling up a six coupled, three cylinder, unified drive locomotive chassis. Anyone wondering whether it might have resembled a Bulleid may be on the right lines. Being lazy, I thought it would be a much easier way of calculating the out-of-balance forces than trigonometry and Taylor series, since you could put force reaction probes in the "axlebox" bearings. However, it turned out that even with numerically perfect geometry and fixed positions of every axle, the force reaction probes spiked to infinity every time a coupling rod passed through the dead centres, which rather negated having it six-coupled. It was something of a surprise to me, since I'd just assumed the rods on the other side would do the work as one side passed dead centre, but with infinitely stiff components and zero clearance that isn't quite the case. Real engines bend and have clearances, of course, so infinite forces don't happen in the same way.

    On another note, I would bet that the length of coupling rods used in this country up until the end of the 4-4-0's supremacy probably tracked (crudely) the strength and consistency of the available steel. For a given rod cross section and rotational speed, the bending stresses at speed go up with the square of the length, so Drummond going from 9' on the C8 to 10' on the T9 was close on a 25% increase in loading, like for like. You can deepen the section of course and get geometry on your side, but then the mass goes up too and returns are diminished.
     
    jnc, LMS2968, Jamessquared and 3 others like this.
  8. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,160
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Still, getting back to the topic of the thread, marvellous liveries on all these 4-4-0s, 2-2-2-0s and 4-2-2-0s....

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
     
    240P15, bluetrain and jnc like this.
  9. Martin Shaw

    Martin Shaw New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    65
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Scotland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Interesting discussion, to add a note to Tom's contribution Drummond's D15s also had a 10' coupled wheelbase and when I was researching for a model it would seem that 10' appears to be a practical limit on most British railway 4-4-0s of the Edwardian era, apart from the mentioned Eastleigh oddities.

    Bluetrain raised an interesting point about Caley boilers, I have just started Vol 2 of the CR locos book and indeed there was a standard boiler that was used on many classes, certainly the 66 and 294 classes, and long into the LMS era apparently. BTW the book is excellent, highly recommended.
    Regards
    Martin
     
    bluetrain likes this.
  10. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In terms of basic dimensions, steam locomotives in the UK are largely designed by parameters outside the control of the draughtsman. The frame plates are controlled by the rail gauge and control the width of the firebox, unless you go wide firebox, and the length is constrained by wheel spacing, which is constrained by both track curvature and boiler length. firebox depth is controlled by wheel diameter, not to mention ashpan size. Boiler size is limited by loading gauge, the wheel diameter and the ability of the driver to see forward. Boiler length is a compromise to some extent determined by cylinder position, notwithstanding the need to maintain a satisfactory tube length/diameter ratio. Then there is the civil engineer to satisfy, oh and let's not forget those operating people. The draughtsmans skill is in designing a loco to fit all these compromising parameters and make it work.
     
    MellishR, jnc, andrewshimmin and 2 others like this.
  11. bluetrain

    bluetrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wiltshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Don't think that anyone could disagree with that sentiment. Although if judging purely on livery, my votes would go to the Caledonian Dunalastairs and Great Eastern Claud Hamiltons! And naturally not forgetting the S&DJR.

    The D15s introduced significant changes to previous Drummond practice. One change was the use of a grate that sloped and extended over the rear axle, so that 27 sq ft grate could be accommodated without extending the 10 ft coupled wheelbase inherited from the smaller T9 and L12 classes. This design option was increasingly adopted as larger 4-4-0 designs were introduced after 1900 - Claud Hamilton, City of Truro, Midland Compound, GC Director, etc.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  12. pete2hogs

    pete2hogs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    418
    I'm not going to suggest a new build. No not at all.

    But if I did it would be the prototype 3 cyl 0-8-0 which would be interesting to test. It would surely be capable of some useful work at speeds up to 25mph?

    Incidentally I understood that at least part of the reason for uncoupled wheels was the very restrictive LNWR loading gauge below platform level. That was still a problem in the 1920's, part of the reason why the Crabs had their cylinders shoved halfway up their sides. Stanier confronted the issue and got the Civils to back down.

    Good stuff on the Webb/Whale/Bowen-Cooke saga in this book:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Crewe-Locomotive-Works-Its-Men/dp/B00SLRBOF4

    Sorry, I digress. It's late and I'm slowly going stir crazy - on a 14 day lockdown because of exposure to a Covid-infected person.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  13. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,160
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sorry about your quarantine.
    I thought Stanier got round the issue with higher boiler pressure and hence smaller cylinders?
    @LMS2968 will be able to confirm :)

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
     
  14. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Very true, Mate, he did, but that still wasn't sufficient for the Chief Civil Engineer, who produced a list of locations where the new 2-6-0's cylinders would foul the loading gauge. Stanier's answer was to fit lead 'fingers' to the latter engine's profile and run it through all the places listed. In only a few were the fingers bent, so proving that, mostly, clearance existed, and gave the CCE the job of moving back platform copings in those places where it didn't.
     
    jnc, Bluenosejohn and andrewshimmin like this.
  15. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    My favourite as well.The two outside cylinders were 15 inch sitting 6 feet 8 apart.
    The Teutonics had 14 inch outside cylinders sitting 6 feet 6 apart

    Thank You ,I have ordered one for 10£ postage to Denmark included.
    Steam-crazy old men are getting a diminishing group.
     
    andrewshimmin and LMS2968 like this.
  16. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Interesting. According to the gauge I've seen the LNWR gauge was not especially restrictive below platform level: 8'8.5in, half an inch wider than many other lines, including the L&Y. The Midland was a tad wider at 8'9". The GW was about the widest at platform height, but only because they accepted a much smaller platform to gauge clearance than anyone else.

    One may note that Stanier's lead fingers were a more subtle way of doing what Churchward had done at the turn of the century when he fitted a Dean single with dummy outside cylinders and sent it all round the system to see what hit.

    I've not found a copy of an LMS composite gauge, but there surely must have been one. If anyone has a copy I would love to see it.
     
  17. bluetrain

    bluetrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wiltshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Claughtons were 8ft 8in over platforms, but earlier LNWR engines were generally narrower. A Webb Teutonic appears (from a faded diagram) to be 8ft 3in overall width. I wonder whether, back in the 1880s, any of the early Liverpool & Manchester lines still had their original narrow track spacing, which could have affected Webb's design options.

    Ref the "LMS composite loading gauge" I suspect that there was more than one of them. For Black Jobs (Stanier Class 5 and below), the LMS seems to have built within both the LNWR width below platform and the Caledonian height limit (12ft 11in), so that the general purpose engines were "loading gauge friendly" just about everywhere. But LMS-built Big Red Engines were up to 13ft 2½in high and were able to operate to Glasgow, in spite of being too high according to Caledonian and GSWR loading gauges.
     
    240P15 and Bluenosejohn like this.
  18. sir gilbert claughton

    sir gilbert claughton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    511
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    east sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    the first batch of Claughtons had a piece "nibbled" out of the buffer beam after striking platform ends, which suggests they were at the maximum possible width
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  19. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It got complicated for sure. The GWR General Appendix to the rule book has four pages of restrictions as to what coaching stock may be used on which GWR lines. There's a story in Cook's Swindon steam where he was driving a 4700 during the General Strike, and was diverted through Weston Super Mare, and, unsure as to whether the 47 was actually allowed down that route, coasted the train very gingerly through the station.
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  20. MattA

    MattA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2014
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    342
    Location:
    82F
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    This thread seems to have drifted quite a lot - surely a split is in order?
     
    240P15 likes this.

Share This Page