If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Edward Thompson: Wartime C.M.E. Discussion

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by S.A.C. Martin, May 2, 2012.

  1. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Most Pullman types, Gresley and Thompson coaches do too. That's why the LNER Pacifics plus the Bulleids all had drop head buckeye couplings.

    [​IMG]

    Source: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url...ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCLD1l-S09OkCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD

    The LNER recorded a number of "mega trains" (over the normal carriage numbers) but by far the most impressive was the V2 taking the twenty something carriage evacuation train out of Kings Cross, unassisted.
     
    Richard Roper and 35B like this.
  2. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Maunsell and Bulleid carriages had buckeye couplings.

    But I think in focusing on that second point, people are missing the first one: the real issue with Bulleids slipping seems to me about an early propensity to slip at speed. By contrast, most locos asked to start a heavy train will, under certain circumstances, slip on starting, for all sorts of reasons discussed. In that context I think a train of screw-coupled carriages can also be considered rigid; the issue is having to move upto 650 tons (including the locomotive) from scratch all in one go, starting at zero revs. You don't do that on any other vehicle: when you start a car, there will be a period in which the clutch is slipping until speed is sufficient for engine revs to match wheel revs. That puts a lot of demands both on rail-wheel interface and throttle sensitivity, and that is before you get into the relationship between where the piston is in its stroke and therefore how many cylinders are receiving steam, where the crank is in relation to applying maximum torque etc.

    Tom
     
  3. clinker

    clinker Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    348
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    romford
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A further thought on rigid couplings, was there any form of 'flexible buffing gear' (for want of a better description) built into the L&NER articulated stock?
     
  4. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    4,440
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    I'm not sure about the relevence of buckeye couplings to this discussion. They may be rigid but also have just as much "slack" in them as do tightly screwed up conventional couplings. If you stop at a station on a slight up grade and try to hold a long train on the loco brake the rear will move back a couple of feet as the train brakes release. This is not a good idea if passengers are boarding at the time.

    Peter
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, probably my fault - I was really trying to distinguish between passenger trains (which are quasi-rigid regardless of couplings) and a loose coupled freight. For a passenger train, even if the couplings are compressed, the loco has to be moving the entire weight of the train within a fraction of wheel revolution - even two feet of slack in the couplings along a train is only about one tenth of a wheel rev for a 6' diameter wheel, after which the entire load has to be moved as one. A loose-coupled freight train is rather better in that regard, but in all cases, starting a steam locomotive is considerably different to almost any other vehicle in which there is a high starting inertia, because of the direct relationship between engine speed (i.e. piston speed) and vehicle speed. Nothing else has that same relationship on starting.

    Tom
     
    ross, 35B, Steve and 2 others like this.
  6. 8126

    8126 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    962
    Gender:
    Male
    Corridor tender LNER Pacifics only, surely? And certainly not on the Bulleid locomotives, although the coaches did have them.
     
    S.A.C. Martin, Jamessquared and Steve like this.
  7. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not something I'd previously considered, but perhaps the coupling arrangements on the FfR explain the perennial slipping issues starting heavy trains in the up direction at T-y-B?
     
  8. 60044

    60044 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2016
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    785
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Salisbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The LNER and SR used Pullman gangways and buckeye couplers for corridor stock, the LMS and GWR used British Standard gangways and screw coupling (by and large that is, there were odd exceptions built for inter-regional workings)
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  9. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Beat me to it :) Buckeyes were fitted because the tenders had Pullman gangways and that is part of the set up.
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  10. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    My apologies, you’re quite right, I should have qualified that better.
     
  11. RLinkinS

    RLinkinS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    928
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The type of couplings will have much less effect than the water spilled from the water cranes a few spots of oil that have dripped from the loco and the whole train being on a curve. I do not know if the station is on a gradient but that would be an additional factor. I did once see the driver of Blanche put a little sand on the rails from a tin, including between the wheels. Despite the wet day the loco started away cleanly.


    Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  12. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,164
    Curves on railways are normally gentle enough that the slight coning of the tyres deals with the different distances on the inner and outer rails.
     
  13. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't think that is true at rest.

    If you imagine a train that has come to rest on a super-elevated curve, it will have fallen (by gravity) to the inside of the curve, i.e. the inside flange will be hard against the gauge face of the inside rail. In that situation, the contact point of the inside wheel is, by the shape of the cone, at its largest diameter; and that on the outside rail is at its minimum diameter - which is precisely the opposite way round to what you want.

    The other issue for drag is that for a train on a curve, the forces through the drawbar will tend to draw the train towards the inside, dragging the inside wheel against the rail head and increasing friction. (Imagine two vehicles with a shallow angle between them caused by the curve: the pull along the axis from the first vehicle will resolve into a component along the axis of the second, and a second component at right angles, pulling the vehicle towards the centre of the curve).

    Tom
     
    69530 and Eightpot like this.
  14. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,164
    Hmm! Maybe, but if the wheels are tending towards the outside when the train is moving, when and how would that change as the train comes to rest?

    That I can readily agree with.

    (BTW the thread drift (lack of slack in couplings) from thread drift (causes of slipping) might belong better in the "Why are Bulleid Pacifics more prone to slipping than other designs?" thread rather than here.)

    I once witnessed and videoed a situation where the screw coupling between the loco and the train was so tight that uncoupling was a very hard struggle. This was on one of the RPSI's weekends when the coaches were approved for carrying passengers in the Republic but not in the North, so the train ran Dublin - Dundalk - Drogheda - Dundalk then empty back to Whitehead. The problem came at Drogheda, when they tried to uncouple the loco to run round. The drive put on steam to try to compress the buffers, but those on the inside were already compressed as tight as they would go, as can be seen in this still from my video. Eventually brute force was needed to start slackening the screw coupling.
    Drogheda.jpg
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Imagine a train running round a long continuous super-elevated curve at the precise speed that the super elevation is designed for. The wheels will be centred on the rails. If it speeds up, it will tend towards the outside. If it slows down, it will tend towards the inside - in the limiting case, if it stops it will come to rest towards the inside of the curve.

    Tom
     
    Eightpot likes this.
  16. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    Collect introduced buckeye couplings in the 1920s on some of his high waisted GWR stock, usually distinguishable by bow ends. The ends of sets coupling to locos had flat ends and screw couplings.
     
  17. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,164
    Not convinced, but I think this particular thread drift has gone too far already.
     
  18. meeee

    meeee Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    The issue is that its a 1 in 100 gradient on a reverse curve and the rail head is contaminated. Double engines don't have sanders either which makes things tricky in the wet.

    Tim
     
  19. Allegheny

    Allegheny Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It doesn't sound correct to me either, my understanding is that the coning steers the wheelset to the position where the wheel diameters are correct for the difference in distance along the inner and outer rails. Sorry for perpetuating the thread drift.
     
  20. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,064
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    @Jamessquared has correctly described the applied maths at work with wheels on a curve. In general the track radius can affect the real load on a train. For instance The stall climbing out of Oban in September 2010 was more to do with the effect of wheel flanges on a curve than the ability of the crew to keep the train rolling.

    As for Thompson and his locomotives, such problems were relatively low on the ECML, for example, that was a well engineered line.
     

Share This Page