If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

S&D Railway Trust

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by Andy Norman, Feb 24, 2020.

  1. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    ‘Regretting the concern caused for members of the S&D trust,...’

    I find it hard to imagine how anyone could come up with such an insincere form of weasel words, short of hiring in a semi-housetrained Polecat, to write it.

    ‘We’re sorry you are sad about us evicting you’, ‘we are sorry you are unhappy about us destroying 40 plus years of work’
     
  2. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    I would agree that, at face value, that statement would seem pretty unambiguous. However, if we are going to "play with words", then the WSRA and/or WSSRT might well argue that "support for the Plc" was a general concept about the overall Plc strategy and should not imply specific approval of individual components thereof such as the WD eviction. I know that might be stretching it a bit, to say the least, but - as I'm sure we're all aware - the intended interpretation of something is not always the same as one's initial impression. Those who wrote that statement may well have crafted it to leave themselves 'wriggle room' :)
     
    mikechant and talyllyn1 like this.
  3. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,939
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    And my goodness are we seeing some wriggling!
     
  4. free2grice

    free2grice Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,283
    Likes Received:
    2,649
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Rolls-Royce engineer
    Location:
    Bath Green Park / Mangotsfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I don't blame you for saying that Robin. Keep your head down until the all clear has been given. <BJ>
     
    jnc likes this.
  5. I wonder how much involvement the WSSRT really had in the joint statement. I suspect that had they seen it before publication they might have managed to get their initials in the right order!
     
    tracker, ross, MattA and 9 others like this.
  6. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sadly it looks like a standard political tactic is being employed.

    Now: "Now is not the right time to discuss this"

    Later: "That is in the past and we need to move on"
     
    BrightonBaltic, tracker, ross and 7 others like this.
  7. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    ..and even the full name of their Trust in the heading!

    Why do I get the impression that this is another document which has been 'rushed out' in an attempt to calm things down, but only succeeded in making them worse?
     
  8. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If you go back to the locked WSR thread on here from around the time it happened there is a bit of information posted on there, but I don't blame anyone for not wanting to hunt through the dross to find it.

    My recollection is that:

    * shortly beforehand the WSRA were striving to change the composition of the PLC board and said they were going to do everything they could to get two of the directors removed from office
    * at least one frequent poster on that thread, who has since passed away, admitted as an aside that he was one of the people who had contacted the ORR
    * by the time the ORR inspection occurred, JJP had become chairman

    As I said this is my recollection of what was posted on here; anyone who has a few days to spare can if they like trawl through the arguments for themselves
     
  9. Downline

    Downline New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2020
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    288
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    After sleeping on it, I think ive worked out what the two drivers behind this really are;

    1. Money
    2. The SDRT are not Great Western

    Health and safety is always a good excuse to fall back onto in any argument, but as most of the claims made could realistically only taken place prior to any of the current board joining and the new lease being signed. This is just a smoke screen for the other two.

    Just look at who are now the key players in all this, they are all known for wanting the WSR to be a 'recreation of the past'. So stations al in chocolate and cream, GWR or WR engines, etc etc. But then they want to run Manors, Halls, Castles, locos which would have never have been able to run on the line.

    Interestingly, from observing during all my visits, and looking on wsr.org.uk, Washford is used reguarly by the WSR Plc PWay as somewhere to dump track machinery. So the PLC have a tennant which has developed and maintains the site for them to come along and use as a storage yard. Whatever rent the SDRT pay, the PLC have a excellent deal in all this if you ask me!
     
    ross, Piggy, Monkey Magic and 2 others like this.
  10. Paulthehitch

    Paulthehitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2020
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hayling Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I recall it to be "Yorkshireman"
     
    tracker and Forestpines like this.
  11. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I can understand the issues about wanting to develop a GWR Ambiance, however 88 is a 'Somerset' loco and nobody would say that The Dukedog doesnt 'fit' the ambience of The Bluebell
     
    BrightonBaltic likes this.
  12. oldmrheath

    oldmrheath Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,265
    Likes Received:
    2,452
    Interesting to see that Washford is proposed to become the PWAY base. When the previous statement talked about perhaps having " some animals" there it must have meant Sharks / Dogfish / Salmon etc.

    Jon
     
  13. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The current suggestion is at least more realistic than some sort of petting zoo, especially as there is one a few miles away.
     
  14. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,064
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    And that was all before the extent of the financial difficulties was known. Nothing wrong therefore with re-examining the rent in that context. However the PLC wants to run with an eviction and that, I agree, is a different matter. In the statement I lost count of the number of times the PLC said that the Trust had ignored their requests. So one or the other of the two sides clearly has a different view of things. And that is why legal teams are involved. No amount of muttering on here will get under the skin of that, imo.
     
    MattA, stimpy, MellishR and 4 others like this.
  15. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I thought that the report to the ORR from a MOP was a separate event. Sorry if I've got confused (not difficult, I know).
    I've just seen the picture of Washford on Steve Edge's site, and it suddenly became clear. As Downline alludes, it is painted Green and Cream, not Mud and Custard. Explains everything. Western exceptionalism trumps common sense (for the zillionth time).
    Pat
     
  16. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Something I have pondered, and posted about, in the past.

    I suspect most of the rest of the UK heritage world looks at all this and shudders, and thanks their lucky stars that their organization isn't like this.

    I fear that the WSR will be a lesson for the rest of the heritage world in what not to do - e.g. to have a membership charity in overall control of the line (to discourage people from using their usual 'business' mindsets when thinking about it); and follow a 'promote from within in stages' policy for all management positions, to allow gauging the ability of potential management personnel to manage volunteers ('herding cats'), as well as insight into their basic character, before they are advanced to a position with real power..
    That would actually be a positive outcome; I fear the reality is likely to be worse, e.g. if the creditors get their hands on the assets. And who knows what a cash-strapped SCC will do with the trackbed if the PLC disappears. (Hint: anyone who trusts a politician to 'do the right thing' is almost certain to be disappointed.)

    Won't it be an irony if the Ex-6's basic concept (that a charity own the trackbed) turns out in retrospect to have been the right one? Too bad they had 'WSR disorder'.

    Noel
     
    ross, Miff, MellishR and 3 others like this.
  17. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    Really?

    This additional 'position statement', which I call the "Note", is explicitly referred in the "joint statement" as follows:-

    "The PLC’s reasons are set out in the attached statement."

    You don't sign a 'joint statement' without considering and having knowledge of something else attached

     
    tracker, ross, echap and 2 others like this.
  18. You were quite correct. The festival took place in June 2019, some months after ORR first became actively involved.

    I doubt a MOP instigated this. More likely visiting railway staff I suspect. The document refers to visitors (plural) contacting ORR, if indeed that actually happened.
     
    tracker and Dunfanaghy Road like this.
  19. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    But knowledge of the attachment in no way affects the situation that the Plc was the sole party responsible for it.

    However...those from the WSRA and WSSRT who signed the joint statement, by doing so IMHO have implicitly - if not explicitly - accepted what the Plc stated in the attachment. If not, then they should have made that fact clear.
     
  20. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No matter how much some people try to hide it, the facts are now out there, and from the reports, it is clear the supporting charities, Sided with the PLC, and talk of one railway family isn't worth anything, prehaps, this was always how it was going to end, with the S&D trust having to take the railway to court, its going to get messy, legal fights never end cleanly, If the trust win, it will finish the railway, the PLC will become insolvent, hopefully from that a new start might become possible, if they lose, then the trust will have to move elsewhere, and i would imagine sever all ties with the WSR including removing 88 whilst it still has some boiler life left, then again, that leaves open the possibility of a claim against the PLC, for steaming fees , for the time it was on hire, as the PLC have already indicated they are not going to stand by their contract to overhaul the engine, in return for free use of it, any Judge would i think find it fair to seek damages for this, so either way, pig headedness has ensured that its now highly likily the WSR will fail in the near future.
     

Share This Page