If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Exactly the sort of thing I had in mind in my previous post, thank you very much!
     
  2. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That would be a less safe method of working. It's always best not to introduce a less safe method of working if you don't have to.

    In particular, that would introduce a situation where in some circumstances drivers were free to ignore signals without being specifically instructed, and where crews would need to know which set of rules were in operation in order to know how to respond to a Danger signal. To my mind that sounds like a very inadvisable method of working.

    There are also issues such as: the train crew would have no guarantee that points would be correctly set
     
    Wenlock and Footbridge like this.
  3. Ian Monkton

    Ian Monkton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    South Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    And Williton level crossing is another part of the answer!
     
    malcolm imps and 35B like this.
  4. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The issues concerning Bradley Manor seem to have overshadowed the problem that has arisen for a WSR volunteer fireman.
    Bradley Manor can and will be repaired but losing valuable and dedicated volunteers is something quite different. I suspect he has like many other stalwart WSR volunteers - as far as most onlookers on NP are concerned - played a very full part in drumming up interest in the WSR and particularly volunteers plus his obvious dedication to what they do as a volunteer. I don't now what was written on Facebook as I do nor read it, but I am sure the words were chosen well. A great loss to the line if he walks away from it, in my opinion. He seems to have been, as one or two others have been similarly treated, with little cognisance of their input and strong support for the WSR. Yet another sad episode in the history of the WSR, it never seems to cease!
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2019
    Yachtie, jnc and nine elms fan like this.
  5. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,490
    Likes Received:
    23,720
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I didn't read @Andy Norman's post as referring to @aldfort o_O
     
    Sheff, Wenlock and Aberdare like this.
  6. Andy Norman

    Andy Norman Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2015
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No, its another well-known, respected and long standing Fireman from the WSR who has been removed not Aldfort. The comments on Facebook were stating his opinions borne from frustration and management not engaging and were not what I would call rude or derogatory and certainly less forthright than some of the remarks placed here at times (you will note not many WSR people post here anymore, they get attacked if they do). But he was not taken to task under the Social Media policy in any case, just removed from volunteering because......
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2019
    jnc and Greenway like this.
  7. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No name in the first paragraph Paul, but there is in the third. That's why I translated it the way I did.
    I just read Andy's post and realized I am mistaken. But whoever it is similar comments apply as far as I can see.

    PS: My earlier post has been modified to eliminate names.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2019
    Andy Norman likes this.
  8. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,490
    Likes Received:
    23,720
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In all other respects, and as confirmed by @Andy Norman above.
     
    Andy Norman likes this.
  9. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Level crossings worked from the signal box, points detected by signals, the need not to over-carry tokens (and a few other things I haven’t thought of, I’m sure).

    Robin
     
  10. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Other posts have probably answered this but it is possible to run "One Train Working" but normally only if signalboxes can be "switched out" with signals cleared/lowered for both directions simultaneously.

    Of course such switching out is only possible if the level crossings are not interlocked with the signals.

    You may be aware that the KESR runs some trains, such as evening Pullman dining services, under such arrangements. This is only possible because all public road crossings on that line (other than at Tenterden) are technically "Train Crew Operated" (although gatemen may sometimes be provided {and signalmen may operate gates on behalf of the train crew}).
    Because of Tenterden gates being interlocked with the signals, both Tenterden and Rolvenden signalmen are required for trains to operate over that section of line, but either or both Wittersham Rd & Northiam can be thus switched out with crossing gates closed across the railway.
     
    Forestpines likes this.
  11. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,164
    Permanent way allowed to deteriorate to the extent that, even after emergency work over the winter, it can't take anything heavier than a Manor. Funds running dangerously low. New management determined to deal with both of those issues (though having to sell some of the family silver), but then telling long-standing hard-working volunteers to get lost because of their (real or perceived) sins without going through the specified procedures but instead suspending the orders that include those procedures. And now a locomotive has failed and will need a major and expensive repair. I'm very glad to be only a spectator from afar (aka keyboard warrior), not caught in the thick of it.

    BTW Thanks for the answers about one-train operation.
     
  12. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    How about an Ivatt from the IOWSR as a replacement?
     
  13. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Or the ESR? Much closer
     
  14. big.stu

    big.stu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    1,754
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Software Engineer
    Location:
    Cambridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It's not just firemen being lost - I know of a driver who has chosen to stop driving at WSR because it has all got "too political". I have no direct connection to WSR but even from a distance it really doesn't have a good feel about the way things are currently going...
     
    Sunnieboy and jnc like this.
  15. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A loan engine is going to cost money, don't matter where from, and that's on top of the repair costs involved with 7802, At a time when the WSR doesn't have money to spare, add into the problem the poor state of the permanent way, which handicaps what you can run, and its an even bigger problem Some times, drastic means is the only answer, It might have been better for the Railway had it gone bankrupt, and a new company and supporters organisation taken over , the line closed whilst the railway got the track up to a proper standard got stock sorted and start a limited steam service from Minehead to Willington , and DMU from there until the lines in a far healthier state financially .
     
    Graft on likes this.
  16. 3855

    3855 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    443
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    inside a boiler
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I love all the froth, but lets not forget 7802 will be subject to an operating agreement with the West Somerset Railway and a failure as suggested by the earlier photograph will more than likely be subject to an insurance claim.
     
    jnc likes this.
  17. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Presumably you mean a Williton
     
  18. Paul.Uni

    Paul.Uni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    584
  19. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    What is the status of 2-6-0 9351?
     
    Johnme101 and MattA like this.
  20. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    The status of 9531 (not 9351) is presumably now very important!

    I must say I agree with Aberdare's analysis of the photo, and it appears the piston rod fractured partly perhaps some time ago then failed completely at the point of the front of the cotter pin in the crosshead. This could have happened on the SVR, if not transferred to the WSR. And Ben Yates is quite wrong to apportion any blame to the WSR.

    I wouldn't have thought this would be covered by insurance in any circumstances, and presumably the Erlestoke Manor Trust who own the loco will have to foot the not inconsiderable bill for the repairs.

    It must have been quite a 'BANG' to cause the considerable damage and ejecting of the piston plus severed piston rod out of the front of the cylinder, removing the cylinder cover and most of the studs and a lot of cylinder end damage in the process.

    Perhaps 9466 will be given some dispensation, and its travels aborted? That will be interesting, in Board meetings, unless JJP allows the loco to be used completely free of any charge. Perhaps the track upgrade will be brought forward, and an 'emergency appeal' instituted? ( I am completely in the dark as to exactly what track upgrades and where are required other than some mention on here of Blue Anchor loop).

    Cheers,

    Julian
     

Share This Page