If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

2999: Lady of Legend

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Ian White, Oct 31, 2017.

  1. 60017

    60017 Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    9,002
    Likes Received:
    7,891
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired from corporate slavery :o)
    Location:
    Fylde Coast
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Confidence in design and manufacturing? I'm sure our GWR forum members will know.
     
  2. paullad1984

    paullad1984 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    428
    Gwr enginemen disliked all over cabs funnily enough and rigidly stuck to what was in place.
     
  3. 7P6F

    7P6F Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,609
    Likes Received:
    834
    Gender:
    Male
    Brilliant day today in more ways than one with the weather forecasters as inaccurate as ever. 2999 visited all parts of the site and gave rides on the demo line. And the Atlantic conversion was positively mentioned in the speeches. Congrats to the GWS with a new Saint 65 years after the last one was scrapped.
     
  4. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Based on the evidence of the engines they used, the average GWR loco man must have been only about five foot tall (but with six foot long arms) so the cabs probably seemed reasonably capacious to them. :)

    As for tri-cocks: the GWR wasn't exactly alone in slightly odd design choices. The blower valve on a Black 5 is neatly positioned directly above the firehole door, so in the event of a serious blowback, both crew members get an equal opportunity to suffer burns while trying to whack it open...

    Tom
     
    oldmrheath, Johnb and 60017 like this.
  5. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
    Ah, but Stanier, the great man himself, was a product of Swindon. Some habits died hard? ;)
     
    jnc and 5944 like this.
  6. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I knew about the blower valve on all Stanier locos but to be fair it is a handle rather that a wheel so you can knock it round with the coal hammer or shovel. Bulleid had a much better idea with a long cross-shaft across the cab with a handle at each end easily within reach of both driver and fireman
     
    Glenmutchkin and dublo6231 like this.
  7. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    On the latter point, Bob Meanley has already explained on here that the GWR rigid design of water gauge, with the water column connecting top and bottom valves, ensured that they could not be out of alignment, which was considered to be one of the main sources of failures on independent valve gauges.
    The UK practice of needing to run with firehole doors open seems odd when compared with practice elsewhere, and the common use of steam operated Franklin/butterfly doors, with closed being the default position (as initially used on Bulleids I think).
     
  8. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    100%.
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  9. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No doubt, though that doesn't explain why the GWR felt that one was sufficient (plus try cocks) while other railways preferred two gauge glasses.

    I've always found having the doors open helps with getting the coal in ;)

    More seriously, there's probably an interesting discussion to be had there, but I suspect on a different thread.

    Tom
     
    flying scotsman123 likes this.
  10. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There's at least one video on Facebook

    Looks as if she raises steam and the safety valves work...
     
  11. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As with a lot of things there's a balance to be struck. Two gauge glasses presumably means double the chance of failure. It all depends, I suppose, on how reliable the rest of the design is as regards false indications.
     
  12. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No it doesn’t mean twice the chance of failure, it doesn’t change it. If the chances of one glass going is, say 1 in 1000 and that glass blows the chances of the second one going is still 1 in 1000. It just means the loco fiexng become a total failure.
     
  13. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    GW practise was to shut the doors between each shovelfull was it not?
     
    sir gilbert claughton likes this.
  14. Andy Williams

    Andy Williams Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    908
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not at all. GW practice was to use the flap, which is far easier. Opening and shutting firehole doors between shovelfuls is a vastly overrated pastime.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2019
  15. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Well yes, but if the chance of failure of a glass is one every thousand trips, the chance of one of two failing is two every thousand trips. AIUI GW crews carried a spare glass and could fit it.
     
    michaelh likes this.
  16. Mr Valentine

    Mr Valentine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    815
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Changing a gauge glass is a basic job which every fireman learns, it takes but a couple of minutes. You should always check that you have a set of spare glasses and rubbers before going off shed.

    A glass going does not, as some people seem to be implying, constitute a total failure.
     
  17. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    From previous posts on here, the Mid Hants seem to think so.
     
  18. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Regulations on factory boilers have required two means of water level indication since the 1880's. Railways fell outside this requirement but generally provided two.. Even though the GWR provided try cocks, as well as a gauge glass, they were on the same column so a blocked portway would affect both the glass and the try cocks.
     
  19. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No it’s not. If you are on an aircraft and one of two engines fail does that mean you have halved you chance of landing safely? The is no ad the chances of the other one going are still infinitesimally small
     
  20. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The key thing though is that if you have one glass and it breaks, you are "blind" until you can change it. If you have two and one breaks, you still have a water level reading. (The likelihood that two fail simultaneously is vanishingly rare). So even though you can change a glass, if you have two you have bit more choice over when to do it.

    Clearly, the GWR wasn't over run with catastrophic boiler failures that could trace their cause back to a crew running without knowledge of water level because of a broken glass. So their method worked for them, but I still find it interesting that by the early twentieth century, all the other major companies had decided that having a second glass was an additional expense or complication worth having.

    Tom
     

Share This Page