If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. DragonHandler

    DragonHandler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, and a King is double red but that hasn't stopped 6024 from running on the line.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  2. GW 5972

    GW 5972 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It seems that most heritage lines are passed for much higher axle loads than were allowed in BR days and before.
    Hammer blow is probably more important than axle weight and a well balanced four cylinder loco trundling along at
    25mph is unlikely to be too unfriendly to the track.
    Going off at a tangent, Kings were never allowed over Saltash Bridge,due to weight issues yet my first trip over with KE 1 was double headed with Tangmere!!!
     
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  3. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Depends what the track nd civil engineering structures are like. The occasional use of a "heavyweight" is one thing. Everyday use is quite different.

    PH
     
    Kje7812 likes this.
  4. DragonHandler

    DragonHandler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Saltash Bridge was strengthened by BR/NR to allow heavier trains to cross it thus opening up Cornwall to Kings.
    Going off at another tangent, everyone seems to call it "Saltash Bridge" but it's proper name is the "Royal Albert Bridge".
     
  5. Robin

    Robin Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Location:
    Stourbridge
    Mentioned in October last year but in fairness, this being the WSR thread, it was almost 200 pages ago. ;)
     
  6. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Almost.

    Norton to Bishops Lydeard is ‘red’ having no significant underline structures. That has been helpful in accepting and servicing large mainline locos.

    Robin
     
    Paul Kibbey and Yorkshireman like this.
  7. GW 5972

    GW 5972 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Soon to be Resident 6695 is another Red engine so the appeal just announced to upgrade track and structures would
    seem very timely.
     
  8. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It would be helpful to see some figures on the cost of the necessary upgrades, to be able to judge the wisdom of this alternative against the alternative of not doing so and fundraising instead for covered accomodation, a paint shop, additional passing loops etc etc and all the other things that would make us a better railway as we enter our fifth decade in preservation.

    I assume such figures must exist given a decision appears to have been taken to pursue this course?

    One of many questions.

    Robin
     
  9. granmaree

    granmaree Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    497
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Maybe AdM has had some effect, or put his hand in his pocket .....
     
  10. Maunsell907

    Maunsell907 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    1,965
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It would be interesting for you to tell us the estimated costs of "covered accommodation, a paint shop, additional passing loops etc." It will help us to appreciate how this might compare with current spends on the infrastructure..

    Regarding locos and weights; a very complex and I submit contentious subject. As has already been mentioned we are a 25mph Railway not a 55mph Railway. It is not simply a matter of loco axle weights, there are other factors e.g. number of cylinders, a four cylinder loco is effectively self balancing, a two cylinder freight loco (with 55 inch coupled wheels) will exhibit maximum 'fore and aft' in the speed range of our line speed. The need to minimise this and transfer the horizontal forces to the vertical will impact on the track. But then the freight loco has a far lower static weight per coupled wheels than a 'King' or 'Royal Scot' (which are particularly heavy on the rear coupled wheels)

    And then we have the 'Valleys tank'. (6695) Everybody connected with the WSR appears to perceive this to be an ideal operational loco, ie suitable power for our needs (8 coach trains), same boiler as other Classes etc. But: they were not one of Swindon's carefully thought out designs; 200 built straight off in five years to meet an urgent need. A Swindon standard boiler effectively placed on a TVR Class A frame ( if my memory serves me right). A thoroughly badly balanced loco which required significant extra balance weights etc., a serious track 'bashes ' but of benefit to the Railway. ( and PH it's not a large loco !)

    Also to add to the horrors, 6695's smokebox, ( due to the No.2 boiler on the TVR 'bottom') position is such that access is difficult, indeed in our safety conscious age I imagine for regular use, quite correctly an access platform will be required.

    If we are to remain as a steam motive power Railway (we are 22.5 miles long; we have to run long trains for the fare box to meet the overheads, be able to accelerate trains rapidly to 25mph, sustain this speed on a 1/92 gradient. For this to happen we should be be able to run whatever Class4 loco or larger is available.) then with loco availability becoming more difficult we need to have a freedom of choice.

    Michael Rowe
     
  11. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    My understanding would be that a Board proposing such an action would come to the shareholders with a well worked out plan (including some figures) not the other way round. Or have I misunderstood that? Plainly I am not a corporate lawyer.

    When I last looked, I was a shareholder of the WSR plc not a Director but the changes have been so rapid recently, and the post doesn’t arrive here until midday...

    Robin
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2018
    michaelh, tracker and Yorkshireman like this.
  12. Snifter

    Snifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    4,210
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Try shovelling the ash out of the 4F smoke box. It tends to concentrate the mind.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  13. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Fit a panel which could be swung down as the SR did to their USATC 0-6-0Ts (which did nothing for their looks :().
     

    Attached Files:

  14. NOTFORME_99

    NOTFORME_99 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    94
    Gender:
    Male
    I see that in the Thornbury Castle announcement that it is hoped to have Kinlet Hall back on the WSR next year.
     
  15. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm guessing the ' all ' is the really interesting bit .
     
  16. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes.

    Given the state of the present planning of this project, IMHO, the risks and uncertainties far outweigh the (alleged) benefits for our Railway and it does not have my support.

    There are many, many questions to ask. Rest assured they will be asked. But not in this forum.

    Robin
     
  17. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Hopefully we will find out more in due course .
     
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  18. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
     
    paulhitch likes this.
  19. Yorkshireman

    Yorkshireman Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2014
    Messages:
    4,486
    Likes Received:
    5,045
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Comfy chair occupant!
    Location:
    No moaners please!
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Given the weight/configuration of the loco is it really viable without very expensive engineering work to the infrastructure needed to run it in regular service? The GWR/BR loco classification was not done without good reason. Just curious.
     
    Paul Kibbey and paulhitch like this.
  20. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just to put another angle on it, I understand from discussion here a while ago that some of the running line isn't in the greatest of shape anyway (80 tiebars?) So just viewing the cost in isolation might not be wise if a large proportion of that money needs to be spent just maintaining the infrastructure anyway, suddenly upgrading the WSR to red doesn't look so expensive after all.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.

Share This Page