If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    3,316
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thanks to all who contributed to the locomotive physics lesson - very educational! :)
     
    Paul Kibbey and Yorkshireman like this.
  2. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    3,077
    Spending one's formative years working in at least three systems of units still has advantages.
     
    Paul Kibbey, jnc and Yorkshireman like this.
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,433
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, apologies for the mixed units: I was writing in a hurry so didn't tidy up; and I suspect that for most people saying the speed was e.g. 20mph may be more meaningful, even though 8.9m/s is what went into the calculation ...

    Incidentally, one odd conversion that always sticks in my mind is that 25mph is about 11 metres per second. In the context of a heritage railway, saying you run at 25mph always seems quite slow, but when you realise it is 11m/s, it shows how far you could travel in a short time if for example you see an obstruction. Essentially rather less than two seconds to travel a carriage length.

    Tom
     
  4. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    10,088
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The legislation which we run to has the cut-off at 40 kmph, which is near enough 25 mph.

    When it comes to calculations and a sense of whether the answers are realistic, I can cope with primary metric but have to convert it all to imperial to get any sense out of it.
     
    railrover and Paul Kibbey like this.
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,433
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I tend to flit fairly comfortably between imperial and metric when it comes to mass, length, volume etc (though I can't imagine acres: I have to convert mentally to a box of certain dimensions laid out on the ground). When it comes to slightly more abstract concepts like energy, I normally think exclusively in SI units - probably a consequence of having learnt thermodynamics at University entirely in that system.

    There is also the question of finding a set of units that makes sense for the kind of calculation you are performing, not least to sanity check the answer. If you want to know how long it will take to drive to some distant location, miles (or kilometres) per hour makes sense. If you want to know how long you've got to e.g. compose a photo of an approaching fast-moving object, metres (or feet) per second is a more natural unit!

    Tom
     
  6. Hugh Perrett

    Hugh Perrett New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    32
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    When the WSR re-opened to Williton in the late 70s one of the xPwllheli water tanks was installed at Williton, there was the usual 'panic' of the time and the tank was erected very quickly after some repairs. the location of the tank was as per the (then) loco departments instructions. There was no budget for the project, the WSRA paid for the concrete base, the repairs cost nothing and the water feed pipe to the tower was donated. What surprises me is that at some point (after the installation of the water supply at BL?) the Williton tank was removed, given the comments here I would have thought that keeping the then present water tank at WN would have been a good insurance policy for tank engines and even tender locos with 'problems'.
     
    Paul Kibbey, Black Jim and mvpeters like this.
  7. Colin Allcars

    Colin Allcars Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    491
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Newport
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    At Arley at the SVR Gala I was looking at a porters trolley with 2C 1Q 3LB on it and trying to work out how many pounds that was. Off the top of my head I came up with 255. If I am wrong, can anyone help?
    I'm not very good on roods, perches and acres though.
     
  8. daveb

    daveb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    484
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wimborne, Dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm pretty sure that 255 lb is correct.
     
    Colin Allcars likes this.
  9. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In operational terms the Williton tank was a nightmare. Exactly where you would not want it to be, so an up train would block the north end points taking water, preventing the down train getting away.

    The concrete base is still there.

    Robin
     
  10. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,247
    Likes Received:
    17,947
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Bring back 'net ton train miles per engine hour' I say!

    Robin
     
    johnofwessex likes this.
  11. Maunsell907

    Maunsell907 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    1,965
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Excuse my predeliction for Imperial units, it's what I remember from BR steam days (I am old enough to have been educated in Imperial, introduced to SI at Uni, then worked in the US to add to the confusion etc)

    At 20 and 40 mph I estimate the EDHPs with a Manor are 475 and 1006 (IHPs are always difficult, some have derived quadratic equations but I remain doubtful) probably based on the Swindon tests IHPs 580 and 1250.

    Non stop Williton Crowcombe times at these speeds I think will lead to start to stop times of 20 & 11 minutes. (Over the last 20 years there have often been non stop runs between the two at Galas.) The 20 is based on actual performances, I have never travelled from WN to CH in 11 minutes !

    An alternative back of a 'fag packet' approach to estimating total power requirements is to assume the figures quoted above appertain to the whole run ie extra energy involved in accelerating the train to line speed is recovered in the slowing down for CH as per Steve (I will ignore the complication of the 10 mph psr into the Up platform at CH)

    Taking 20 and 11 minutes this gives an increased energy requirement for running at 40mph compared with 20mph of 18% if based on IHPs, 16% if based on EDHPs

    This I think highlights another issue when considering accelerated schedules. Operating locos beyond their optimum efficiencies.

    The 20mph would require (based on Swindon test figures for Manors on Blidworth coal at 30mph) 1300 lbs coal/hr

    The 40 mph 3200 lbs/hr at least ie an increase in coal consumption of 35% for 40mph vs 20 mph running between WN and CH..

    This assumes that the Manor could even sustain such an evaporation rate ie to run six coach trains at 40 mph uphill reliably from WN to CH would require a Class 5 loco at a minimum.

    "It is the gradient not the speed that is the killer" At our speeds yes.

    At higher speeds things change ie the gradient of course remains a linear function but speeds:

    Figures from the very detailed Mark 1 tests gave:
    20 mph - 4.1 lbs/ton, 40 - 6.5, 60 - 9.7, 80 - 13.8, 100 - 20
    That is to double the speed at 20mph increases the resistance by 58%
    To increase the speed by 25% at 80 mph increases R by 45%.

    As you go faster gradients are of course less percentage wise a killer, hence 1/40 gradients and steeper on HS1

    Aldfort. When I quoted 4160 operating at 225 psi I was referring to that stage of its Preservation life rather than latter day 200 operation. I assume the steam chest pressure would be 200-210 max with RFO and valves simmering ie ideal firing !

    Michael Rowe
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2017
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  12. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    2,413
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry 241 LB 2 X (14 X 8) 112 = 224 + 14 = 238 + 3 = 241 LB
     
  13. Maunsell907

    Maunsell907 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    1,965
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Does not one quarter = two stones ie 28lbs. The answer is 255 lbs ?

    Michael Rowe
     
    tracker likes this.
  14. Colin Allcars

    Colin Allcars Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    491
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Newport
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In your calculation the terms 224 and 3 are correct but 14 should be 28; one quarter is 2 stone or 28 lbs.
     
    stallis1 likes this.
  15. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Quite so.

    The "Quarter" is a quarter of a hundredweight (cwt) so 112/4 lb.
     
    Black Jim likes this.
  16. Black Jim

    Black Jim Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    166
    Sorry Tom , next time can you not convert to metric! Especially when talking about steam engines, as I, & a reckon a lot of others have no idea what you're talking about !
     
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,433
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It does make calculations easier without having to put in a bunch of constants though! (Especially when sitting on the train home doing the calculations away from any references...)

    But the key point is really the relative numbers: for a climb comparable in length and gradient to Williton - Crowcombe, the interesting point is that most of the work is done against gravity at the kinds of speed run on heritage railways: speeding up even to 40mph only adds about 14% more energy requirement. (The original contention was that, broadly the amount of coal and water used was only slightly dependent on speed, which is true up to speeds faster than we can run on a heritage railway, but not at very high speeds).

    As for power: 0.7MW is 940hp; and 0.33MW is 440hp. Those figures aren't a million miles away from those arrived at from presumably a different methodology by @Maunsell907: given the approximations inherent in what was a back of the envelope calculation, probably largely insignificant difference. Also interesting that Michael came up with an energy difference of about 16% between 20mph and 40mph, which again is pretty close to the 14% difference I came up with on a notional bit of 1 in 100 gradient.

    Tom
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2017
    Black Jim likes this.
  18. Kengo

    Kengo New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2014
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    33
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    HEAD GARDENER
    Location:
    BISHOPS LYDEARD
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Looks right 2 x 112 lbs per cwt - plus 28lb [1quarter of cwt] plus 3 lbs.
    I worked all my life for a coal merchant in c.q.lbs
     
  19. aldfort

    aldfort Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    4,237
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Cardiff
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You'll have to come and show me how to do that one day Michael. ;)
     
    Snifter and Yorkshireman like this.
  20. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Someone please tell me what time BL station shop closes 2moro please thanks
     

Share This Page