If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

80078

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Steve1015, Oct 25, 2012.

  1. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Just read Post 278. It's all there.

    PH
     
  2. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No it's not all there, it doesn't touch availability.

    Oddly enough when 80072 was being restored, it was discussed more than a few times that there was little difference between its restoration and that of a Pacific ...

    Having an 'ideal' sized loco is not the panacea that you seem to think it is ... Most especially when they don't exist universally :)
     
    35B and Matt37401 like this.
  3. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    2,017
    Location:
    Nantwich, Cheshire

    Have you asked yourself another question? Rather than asking why they are not in service ask what the owning group of say a standard 4 is doing to get itself in service? You can't blame a group such as I dunno, dinmore Manor who actively fundraise for their own locos, all of which are larger than a standard 4, for putting the time and effort in to do so. I can't remember ever seeing a single fundraising stall (apart from the coach at carrog for 72 and the elr have a coach) out and about looking for donations. I go to the SVR and I see the 813 stall, 82045, stanier mogul etc but I haven't seen anything for the standard 4 group (is it owned by the passenger tank group or something?)

    Then you also have to look at places where they are in a queue. KWVR the standard only came out of service a few years ago and it's at the back of the queue. The railway are looking at the other locos that they have instead and quite rightly. Should the Bluebell that has 3 prioritize those ahead or more interesting locos? Personally I would say no. Wouldn't this be a very very boring hobby if it were just the same tank engines at every railway. I like to see more variety personally. And if that means bigger locos then so be it. Don't blame the owning groups of those locos for trying to see them steam.


    Or maybe the railways with the larger amounts of locos need to start letting go of ones they don't have time for. There are a load of lines that need locos of their own. Churnet valley, ecclesbourne, mid Norfolk, wensleydale are hardly full of locos to start restoration work on and there are others with 10-15 in queues/sheds or sidings
     
  4. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,667
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Nicely put Gav, as regards owners of 80079 I think the same group own 75069, another machine that's ideal for heritage line use.
     
  5. gwalkeriow

    gwalkeriow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The same basic group of people own 80079 which is in the engine house awaiting its turn, 75069 which is under overhaul and 43106 which is in service. An ideal situation I would have thought.
     
    Andy2857, 26D_M and Matt37401 like this.
  6. flaman

    flaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    2,048
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi-retired farmer, railway & museum owner
    Location:
    Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
    I seem to have started a hare, which is jigging about in all directions and producing some irrelevant statements. There is little equivalence between, say, 43106 and 80079 because the latter has a major problem which will be quite expensive to resolve- it's worn out and needs, at least, a new firebox. This means that it may well be more costly to overhaul than, say, a pacific that only needs re-tubing and tyre-turning. But for most railways it's still the more useful engine.

    Anyway, I'm off to drive trains:).
     
    paulhitch and Hicks19862 like this.
  7. Hicks19862

    Hicks19862 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester
    Off to drive trains when there is a debate raging on an online forum? What sort of railway enthusiast are you? Lol.

    In all seriousness, does one of those trains include 80078?
     
  8. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    This is the bit I can agree with.

    PH
     
    flaman likes this.
  9. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But do they have the facilities, the volunteers and the money? And if they divert facilities, volunteers and money from what they are doing now what will happen to those current tasks?
     
    Paul42 and Jamessquared like this.
  10. flaman

    flaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    2,048
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi-retired farmer, railway & museum owner
    Location:
    Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
    They don't necessarily have to be owned by or be restored on railways. There are other potential buyers out there who have both the facilities and the money. Railways benefit when the locos emerge from restoration as useful working units, rather than being stuffed and mounted or stuck at the end of sidings rotting.
     
    paulhitch and johnofwessex like this.
  11. flaman

    flaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    2,048
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi-retired farmer, railway & museum owner
    Location:
    Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
    Just a humble 03 today, 80078 comes out to play next Sunday:).
     
    Hicks19862 likes this.
  12. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    They may actually be quicker:- see Cranmore.

    PH
     
    Gav106 likes this.
  13. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,667
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Valid point there John, but as I said in my first post you can't have everything in traffic at the same time can you?
     
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It appears to me that a number of railways are experiencing 'issues' related to their loco fleets as home loco's fall due for renewal & hired locos move away
     
    paulhitch likes this.
  15. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Do wish people would lose that IMHO silly phrase. Stuffed and mounted means the external shell on display and all the internal components and workings discarded so it can never be returned to original form. There are precious few locomotives that have been treated like that.

    If there are groups with money and resources available to take on locomotives sitting in linear scrapyards rotting, and they have attempted to buy such at a fair price and been refused that would indeed be very a bad thing. I'd need convincing there are many such examples.

    I bet, however, there are groups without much of either vital requirement who think they should be gifted their favourite locomotive by the organisation that has bought said locomotive and maintains it safely and securely under cover as part of their public display.
     
  16. flaman

    flaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    2,048
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Semi-retired farmer, railway & museum owner
    Location:
    Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
    When I use that phrase I mean locos which, whilst cosmetically restored, secure and in covered accommodation, are years away from restoration to working order even if there were the will, facilities and money to achieve that. There are dozens of such locos scattered about (indeed, I have one myself;)) In the case of a historically significant relic, keeping it conserved and on display is entirely reasonable, but should that apply to potentially useful, relatively modern locos such as 4MTs?

    I can assure you, from personal knowledge, that there are locos, including 4MTs, which currently have no foreseeable prospect of restoration but cannot be purchased even on the most generous terms.

    I fully agree that, especially in railway preservation, there are those dreamers who think that they deserve to have a loco, coach or wagon simply because they happen to like it. I'm not talking about them, but people who have the cash and the proven ability to "do the business" and achieve results more speedily and effectively than the current owners.
     
    Just_Sayin and paulhitch like this.
  17. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Even with a 4MT you are talking about a locomotive that is 60 years old - twice the age of say City of Truro when she went into preservation. So what's a historical relic?

    All these locomotives are going to get more and more expensive to run as they get older, so to my mind a line that is thinking long term and has facilities to properly conserve its currently out of service locomotives is entirely justified in keeping them so they can rotate through the fleet slowly and steadily. Your grandchildren won't thank you if every preserved line runs out of the ability to steam locomotives because our generation has run everything into the ground.

    But I do agree that a line that hangs onto a locomotive that is not properly conserved and stored, but instead is deteriorating in open air, especially if rotting away at the end of a headshunt, should be looking very hard at itself. I just don't think its justifiable to criticise any line for holding onto stock it can care for while we still have a generous supply of Barry wrecks and headshunt scrap lines.
     
    Paul42 and Matt37401 like this.
  18. Hicks19862

    Hicks19862 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester
    And back to the great news that 80078 is back in steam.
     
  19. 1472

    1472 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    2,517
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Where did the "information" that 80079 needs a new firebox come from? That's not been mentioned before.
     
  20. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    It wouldn't be the first of class to require a heritage era replacement firebox and 79 has given plenty of service.
     

Share This Page