If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Sir Nigel Gresley - The L.N.E.R.’s First C.M.E.

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by S.A.C. Martin, Dec 3, 2021.

  1. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    OK, let's be specific. What is incorrect about the entry above?
     
  2. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    As I will explain in my forthcoming Gresley book, it’s really not that simple and there is ample evidence to suggest that there are specific circumstances in which the conjugated gear had its advantages, on certain types of loco, compared to others.
     
  3. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I do have the feeling that if the LNER had designed a better big end then the conjugated gear wouldn't have had nearly such a shaky reputation.
     
    Spamcan81, johnofwessex and RLinkinS like this.
  4. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think you’re right. Post nationalisation, the redesigned big end pretty much cured the problem by all accounts.
     
    Chris86, RalphW and osprey like this.
  5. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    Thanks to Mr Cook. From Swindon!
     
    Paul42 likes this.
  6. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's a little sidelight on design influences as we were talking about above... According to Cook, Collett got the idea of introducing felt pad lubrication for connecting rods from machine tools in Swindon Works.
     
  7. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's a bit eclectic in what it puts in and leaves out e.g.
    - Holcroft's paper to the ILocoE of November 1918 on Three Cylinder Locomotives tackles the geometry of conjugated gear.
    - the D49s also had the conjugating lever to the rear of the cylinders
    - the inside valve also tended to overrun, hence the maximum cut-off was restricted to limit valve travel (65/66% for the V2)
    - the steam distribution in the middle cylinder was poor - see e.g. the BR P&E test bulletin for the V2 and the asymmetric indicator diagrams therein (albeit this was not an issue that was easily rectified nor arguably did it make much difference to the performance)
    - the UP 9000 "double Walschaerts" modification is not explained. Possibly the same as for the Thai Baldwin Pacifics?
    - the Thai Baldwin Pacifics used Gresley gear on the first batch (conjugating lever to the rear of the cylinders) but it was abandoned for the next batch (which used two return cranks on the LHS), which suggests that they were less than impressed with the gear (this Thai example would be a useful addition to the non-UK examples).
     
  8. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It was one of several changes that were made post war to the overhaul and maintenance of Gresley Pacifics and cannot be seen in isolation without reference to the - in my view - infinitely more important setting up of the frames and the increased tolerances with which the Pacifics and other engines with conjugated valve gear were rebuilt.
     
  9. D6332found

    D6332found Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    179
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dinting
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Gresley had a very strong incentive to use his own valve gear. It was his patent and no doubt he was paid handsomely each time it was used.
    "And the big ends gone," a famous phrase. When working well maintained, Gresleys big end was a spectacular stumbling upon a type of super compounding of increased middle cylinder power, inexplicably providing a greater effort than the theory.
    Hence, the world famous Gresley beat
     
  10. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,105
    Likes Received:
    57,439
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well, the very first sentence is I'd say somewhat muddled (being kind):

    "The Gresley conjugated valve gear is a valve gear for steam locomotives designed by Sir Nigel Gresley, chief mechanical engineer of the LNER, assisted by Harold Holcroft."

    That strongly implies that Holcroft was Gresley's assistant, which is not true - he worked for the SECR (and then the SR), not the GNR / LNER. A better understanding would be that Holcroft presented a paper in which he outlined the geometric solution to conjugated valve gear; subsequently Gresley and Maunsell both built (separate) implementations based on that geometric understanding.

    Tom
     
    Fred Kerr and 35B like this.
  11. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Would Gresley have been paid for the patent on his employer's line?

    Holcroft certainly assisted Gresley (to say the least). I'm quite sure you know all this, but for others...

    The time scale (from Holcroft's book) seems to be that Joy first invented a conjugated gear for marine triple expansion compounds in the 19thC. Holcroft independently conceived his own design and patented it in 1909 while working for the GWR. Gresley patented his variation in 1915, and built a locomotive which was described and illustrated in "The Engineer" in 1918. Holcroft suggested a major improvement to Gresley's original concept in a letter to "the Engineer", met with Gresley for a detailed discussion, and was informally offered a job in 1919.

    Holcroft's book implies that Gresley was well aware of Holcroft's original patent and found a loop hole in it - otherwise it would have been Holcroft doing well on the patent - and he didn't work for the LNER. Its unclear to me whether Gresley had the idea independently and revised it to work round Holcroft's patent, or whether he had seen Holcroft's patent and developed his ideas from it.

    There's an interesting What If there - if Maunsell had released Holcroft to go to Doncaster isn't it likely that long travel valve gear and >200psi boiler pressure would have made their way onto LNER locomotives much earlier? And if that had been the case would the A1 have been much better matched with the Castle in 1925?
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2022
    RAB3L likes this.
  12. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    The statement is not incorrect.

    From Holcroft's entry in Wikipedia: "Somewhat later, Nigel Gresley of the Great Northern Railway had designed and patented his own application of conjugated valve gear (late 1916) which required further development to enable it to be applied to three cylinders of differing inclination. Gresley was involved with ARLE and he and Holcroft met at the former's office at King's Cross in January 1919. Holcroft schemed out a practical proposal to allow the Gresley valve gear to operate the inside valve and retain valve events at their correct relationship, by skewing the cylinder and valve axis."
     
  13. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    Developed as part of his payed employment. I doubt he was paid for it. If that were true, it might explain why the LNER was so impoverished.


    Irony?
     
  14. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I will need to check my figures to make sure (as any good historian should), however I think attributing the LNER's relative wealth issues to Gresley and the conjugated valve gear is, to put it bluntly, wrong.
     
    Fred Kerr, 35B and MellishR like this.
  15. 62440

    62440 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    4A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    FAS Brown quotes HNG as saying that Holcroft “has given me the key to the whole situation”.
     
  16. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    I wasn't. I was attributing it to the LNER's possible unnecessary generosity! You would make a good spin doctor.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2022
  17. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That is still, to be blunt, wrong. If you had done the research I've done you'd understand that the LNER finances (as with all large companies) are far more complex at a base level of patent use, let alone paying their own staff for the use of the patents.

    Please leave personal commentary for somewhere else. It's unnecessary.
     
    paullad1984 likes this.
  18. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sorry, what does "the LNER finances ... are far more complex at a base level of patent use" mean?
     
  19. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't know how I can break it down any more than the LNER's finances are more complex than a simple supposition that Gresley was paid per use of his patent by the LNER.
     
  20. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    I did use the words "if" and "might". Perhaps they mean something else to you?
     

Share This Page