If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. nine elms fan

    nine elms fan Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,439
    Likes Received:
    855
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Wessex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You have got to ask your selves who stands to gain this, is all this a ploy by the WSRA to get control of the WSR, after all the association has tried before, there are still people on the WSRA who have personal agendas
     
    GWR4707, Greenway and baldbof like this.
  2. Lplus

    Lplus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    991
    Location:
    Waiting it out.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The WSSRT membership is too small to seriously influence the direction of the WSRA.
     
  3. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No, I differentiate between what happened in the first ~6 months and what's happened since. I also take the view that there were early signals (4110, possibly HPC) the significance of which weren't fully apparent at the time, but which indicate that what we see now is not "bad" governance succeeding "good" governance, but a continuity of style.
     
    Fish Plate, baldbof and snappertim like this.
  4. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Possibly. But, as has been discussed at length, the WSSRT (currently aligned to plc) and WSRA (alignment unclear) shareholdings of c. 10% each could currently either cancel each other out, or drive change. In the context of the Bailey Report's recommendations about structural change*, and the plc board's transparent attempts to kick them into the long grass, my view is that the control of that shareholding needs to be seen not as about individual WSRA members' personal agendas but driving change towards a more sustainable structure.

    My concern is the personalisation of the discussion about individuals' agendas. I don't care whether Joe Bloggs does or doesn't have an agenda, or Joe Bloggs comes out on top. From outside, I care about the organisation being led by capable people who can deliver for the benefit of the WSR, and to give it a sustainable future. If the right person for that is someone who has a "personal agenda", then so be it. And if the reactions to those who might lead are driven by personality, that begs questions to me about whether those around the WSR are really focused on the railway, or actually locked into their own personal conflicts.

    * - for clarity, I'm not differentiating between whether it's better to create a new charity, or repurpose an existing one; that is an entirely separate debate.
     
  5. baldbof

    baldbof Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,828
    Likes Received:
    2,968
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, ex-RAF
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just a question to try any give a clearer view, so don't flame me please.

    Is there any reason why it took the arrival of JJP to initiate the actions in an effort to save the WSR?

    Were those who were board members prior to JJP's arrival, incapable of or reluctant to take any such action themselves?
     
    Swan Age, MellishR, jnc and 2 others like this.
  6. Greenway

    Greenway Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South Hams
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I mentioned in a previous post that those closely involved with the WSR and its constituents could not have failed to see how the direction line was heading. Poor infrastructure, falling passenger numbers and so on. You did not need to be a PLC Board Member of you cared to have looked around. As the tread has debated there were and still are too many conflicting ideas and personalities. There seems to have been a kind of euphoria which took precedence to reality. How quiet it appears to have been. Even now the WSRA seems to acquiesce about the removal of the S&D Trust but some are happy to want to cajole the WSSRT into a merger. Their hopes of the past to own parts of the line maybe one of the present principal causes for the serious concerns by the PLC. There are two sides to this, but only one side has been available to NP readers in the main and the little from the other side has been confusing to say the least.
    Maybe JJP has blotted his copybook as far as a great many folk are concerned but how he has tried to save the line is now history. Someone with a finger in numerous business ventures - yes one seemed to have hit problems in the past, but the rest have not made big news as far as I know. JJP will have many business contacts. Make no mistake, if the SCC had decided to sell the freehold, I believe he would have found the resources to buy it.
     
    Triumph 2500S and nine elms fan like this.
  7. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Who is "they"? People talk as if the WSRA is a person in itself, it's not, it's made of all sorts of different people, and the people are totally different to those several years ago. I just don't get how "The WSRA" has had a long term ambition to do this that or the other in the way that people ascribe to it.

    Again, these "business contacts". How did they help? What did they do?
     
    Fixit, Matt37401, jnc and 5 others like this.
  8. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,046
    Likes Received:
    15,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Considering that its noted previously that the WSSRT only has c.100 members and thus the nominations alone represent 14% of the whole membership one would assume they are pretty confident, as with the previous fuss with the WSRA one hopes they are making a suitable contribution for Nat Pres for using it as their official campaign tool.
     
  9. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but...supposing the WSSRT and WSRA merge and the 'new WSR charity' holds 20% of the plc shares.
    Is that enough to do anything? Would it not require a 51% shareholding to be effective?
    Otherwise the plc could just say 'our 20% shareholder "new WSR charity" wants us to do X Y and Z. We note this request' and then not actually do anything?
    Would 20% be enough to remove JJP as Chairman as many seem to be counting on?
    I don't know enough about company law to say one way or the other, but perhaps others on here could?

    Keith
     
    jnc likes this.
  10. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    With respect, I think that misses the point entirely. What one individual might or might not have been able to do, or whether he did or did not save the WSR in late 2018, does not alter the brutal reality of where the WSR is now:
    • It has been unable to earn income through 2020
    • It requires work on a vital part of it's infrastructure before it can operate to it's major destination
    • It has reinforced it's reputation for internecine strife to the detriment of it's ability to appeal for public support
    I suggest that this not the basis for a sustainable business in normal circumstances, let alone the particular circumstances it now faces. From outside, I draw the conclusion that the current management model is incapable of delivering a long term sustainable business given the heritage sector model of volunteer contribution.
     
  11. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It depends how many minority shareholders fill in the proxy form and send it back to the chairman. Given the remaining shares are held in packets of £5000 or less, with many being only £5, it would take a considerable number. A lot of those £5 shareholders in particular invested decades ago and ma have fallen off the radar. I don't know how many proxies the chairman can usually expect to hold in a meeting, no doubt others will.
     
    johnofwessex likes this.
  12. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It is conjecture, based on two key points:
    1. Many shares are dormant, with little or no engagement with AGMs
    2. There are very few large shareholdings (max 5%?) that could be brought to bear.
     
    A1X 32670 likes this.
  13. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's my point - does the 'new charity' require 51% of the issued shares to be an effective body for change, or just 51% of the shares that turn up at an AGM (whether in person or by proxy)

    Keith
     
  14. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    it depends on the active share holding, many, as much as 52 % are thought to be non active shares, owner died etc, and the relitives don't know of the shares, or just moved away, and theres no address, so its possible that the 20 per cent is the largest block, the SCC own in the region of 10 % , so that means, its likily that combined the two charities could un seat the board, by ellecting new board members, who then oust the sitting ones, by using the overall majority rule at the AGM.which is a majority vote of those present.
    As regards agenda's, whats more important is are that persons motives going to help, or harm the railway, you can have an agenda, but that agenda might be to see the railway on firmer ground, and a happier place,
     
  15. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The latter.
     
    ghost likes this.
  16. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Two separate questions. One is the ability to drive a change by the plc, where I believe it's 51% of those present at an AGM. The other is a future structure, where I'd expect a charity to hold a super-majority (possibly even 100%) of the shares in the operating company given experiences elsewhere and the recommendations of the Bailey report. Details will vary depending on the precise scheme.
     
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You only get a say if you vote. That point has been put slightly disingenuously (in my opinion) on this thread with comments that it would take 75% of the shares to remove a director, and the two charities have only ~ 18% between them. My understanding is it would take 75% of the vote, which is a rather different proposition. That would be to remove a director during their term of office; since they have to stand again at intervals, they could be removed at that point with a simple majority of the vote voting against. Again, it is a majority of the vote, not of the shares.

    Incidentally, in the interests of balance: given what is presumably a large number of dormant shares that will never vote at an AGM, my feeling is that for anyone who had an unscrupulous desire to take over the company, the barrier to entry is rather small - certainly less than 50% of the shares (over £1million) and probably not much more than the combined shareholding of the three or four biggest shareholdings (perhaps half that figure). The fact that no-one has tried to do so is a very strong indicator to me that such conspiracies are wide of the mark, and the realisable assets that could be obtained by someone bent on a hostile takeover and asset stripping simply aren't there to make such a plan worthwhile.

    Tom
     
  18. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What it would need to be honest is both, first a majority vote at AGM to remove and replace the existing board, so movement on change can be made, because, at some point the PLC board will have to vote its self out of existence, to transfer to an charity owned company.
     
  19. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If a minor shareholder has died and his shares are lying forgotten in his widow's drawer of odds and ends, or if a minor shareholder is alive but can't be bothered to open the WSR plc envelope containing notice of the AGM, does the Chairman by default have proxy powers in respect of such shares?
     
  20. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thanks for the replies and info

    Keith
     

Share This Page