<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Steam Traction</title>
    <description>Everything to do with General Steam Traction.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>National Preservation</generator>
    <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/forums/steam-traction.16/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.national-preservation.com/forums/steam-traction.16/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>Oil Firing</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/oil-firing.24632/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/oil-firing.24632/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (RalphW)</author>
      <dc:creator>RalphW</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Since a discussion has started on this subject in the Clan Line thread, thought it would be better to have a dedicated thread.<br />
 <br />
<i>Oh, the days of double headed three cylinder oil fired 43 class 2-10-0s on the 4,000 tonne Ore train South from Emden Docks. (drool).</i><br />
<br />
<i>Ralph, I assume the same applied to the German 01.10 class, of which some members still operate. The Germans used oil burning for steam locos quite a lot. And could seemingly change to and from coal reasonably quickly,...</i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/oil-firing.24632/" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">Oil Firing</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>60007</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/60007.1424611/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/60007.1424611/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sam 60103)</author>
      <dc:creator>Sam 60103</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[60007’s visit to the NYMR at the end of March has already been announced. The rest of the operating schedule gets updated on the SNGLT website linked here: <a href="https://www.sirnigelgresley.org.uk/mob-news.shtml" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">https://www.sirnigelgresley.org.uk/mob-news.shtml</a><br />
Another preserved railway visit around October but August/September remains unclear.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6024 King Edward 1</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/6024-king-edward-1.1424246/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/6024-king-edward-1.1424246/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Champion Lodge)</author>
      <dc:creator>Champion Lodge</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[News on this loco seems to have gone very quiet, can anyone share its current status and whether she will ever grace the mainline again. Pretty sure a couple of years ago she was close to being steamed after major boiler work and new cylinders etc.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>300</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SVR Loco Newsy News / discussions</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/svr-loco-newsy-news-discussions.19520/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/svr-loco-newsy-news-discussions.19520/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (acorb)</author>
      <dc:creator>acorb</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Given how off topic the 75069 thread was going maybe we can continue the interesting SVR loco related discussions here and hopefully in future post any news from the engine sheds to help eliviate the lack of an appropriate website. Locos I would like to see given priority for overhaul are 4930 Hagley Hall (like Broomhalla), ive never seen it steam. Also 7325, very useful and brilliant performer and 7819 Hinton Manor. All the above are appropriate to the line and haven&#039;t steamed for a while....<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/svr-loco-newsy-news-discussions.19520/" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">SVR Loco Newsy News / discussions</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3396</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>P2 Locomotive Company and related matters</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/p2-locomotive-company-and-related-matters.126427/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/p2-locomotive-company-and-related-matters.126427/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (class8mikado)</author>
      <dc:creator>class8mikado</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Not a new newbuild but one that after some consideration seems to be moving from the virtual world to the real one.<br />
Heres a thread for the posting of relevant news relating to this incredible locomotive where one and all can bicker about its right to exist and the wrongness of its shape/colour/name/ number/ valvegear/ boiler/exhaust... etc]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4372</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BR Double blastpipes</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/br-double-blastpipes.1426309/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/br-double-blastpipes.1426309/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Alasdair B)</author>
      <dc:creator>Alasdair B</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I am interested in the upgrades to draughting of various locomotives by BR by installing double blastpipes in the 1950s. Can anyone confirm the diameters of the single and double blastpipes fitted to the following locomotives?<br />
GWR Castle 4-6-0: single             double<br />
GWR King 4-6-0: single               double<br />
BR Standard 4-6-0 Class 4MT: single        double<br />
BR Standard 2-10-0 Class 9F: single         double<br />
Regards,<br />
Alasdair]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>34039 Boscastle WC class</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/34039-boscastle-wc-class.1325994/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/34039-boscastle-wc-class.1325994/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Flying Phil)</author>
      <dc:creator>Flying Phil</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[This locomotive has been mentioned at times in the large Bulleid thread elsewhere here but, as it could be back in steam in the next couple of years, I think a dedicated update thread would be useful.<br />
 This locomotive came to the Great Central Railway in 1973 - the first Main Line locomotive to arrive. It was restored from &quot;Barry condition&quot; over the next twenty years and ran (mainly) on the GC until withdrawn around 2000 with firebox problems. It was stripped down and the bottom end has now...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/34039-boscastle-wc-class.1325994/" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">34039 Boscastle WC class</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>367</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>82045 The way ahead?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/82045-the-way-ahead.13780/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/82045-the-way-ahead.13780/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Kinghambranch)</author>
      <dc:creator>Kinghambranch</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I have read with interest the recent comments, arguments and views on this site regarding the &quot;new build&quot; projects, some of which have a significant existing item such as a boiler already available (such as the Brighton Atlantic and 6880) and others where perhaps only a very few original fittings remain.  The projects vary from the awesome (Tornado) to the diminutive (GER Tank) but they all have their positive sides and hopefully they will all succeed.  After some thought, I have decided to...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/82045-the-way-ahead.13780/" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">82045 The way ahead?</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1711</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bulleid Pacifics - Past or Present</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/bulleid-pacifics-past-or-present.13645/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/bulleid-pacifics-past-or-present.13645/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (34007)</author>
      <dc:creator>34007</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anyone want to talk about Bulleids past or present or Merchants or even WC&#039;s? Well lets start it here! Either rubbish coal back in the days running in to Waterloo to firing a unconverted WC (34007) with 7 on. Or with rubbish coal and stopping for a blow-up! So whats harder a Merchant or a WC converteed or un-converted? My personal opinion and from experience - Converted! Lets talk gents!<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />
<br />
Andy]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>5796</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>70013</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/70013.1292322/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/70013.1292322/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (BillyReopening)</author>
      <dc:creator>BillyReopening</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Just read that its 70013&#039;s last day in steam tomorrow before its ticket runs out..<br />
<br />
Anyone got any info about what the future is for her?<br />
<br />
Olly was the loco that re-kindled my interest in all things Steam about 7 years ago so sad for me if she doesn&#039;t steam again.<br />
<br />
Here&#039;s some of my first pictures I took way back when..<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/robinpengilley/albums/72157634315442831" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">https://www.flickr.com/photos/robinpengilley/albums/72157634315442831</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>268</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
