If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

SVR General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage railways & Centres in the Uk' started by threelinkdave, Aug 20, 2014.

  1. 1472

    1472 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    905
    Why would an extension into the Wyre Forest be desirable? Whilst the area itself is pleasant enough it has no place of special attraction to tourists/day trippers unlike Iron bridge.
     
    Forestpines likes this.
  2. Tuska

    Tuska New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    26
    :D:D
    You're saying the Tenbury line and Wyre Forest isn't worth seeing?

    Not trying to put words into your mouth. But. The question, is rather puerile the more and more you think about it. Why safeguard anything? Why go anywhere? Why bother extending?

    Let's all sit down watch football and moan about Brexit instead. :D But seriously, judge it by its own merits. The route could be a beautiful side attraction for little diesels and GWR auto coach journeys and ease congestion problems for the towns.

    SVR after selling the Bridgnorth tunnel away have pretty much given up on the prospect of ever getting towards Ironbridge so there's still an option with the branchline.
     
  3. Forestpines

    Forestpines Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    479
    Location:
    Bristol
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't think the SVR has ever owned Bridgnorth Tunnel, although they have turned down an offer to buy it.

    Personally I am still somewhat puzzled here: I asked yesterday why on Friday you thought that reopening the Wyre Forest line would be cheaper than going northwards from Bridgnorth; but yesterday you said that the Wyre Forest line should have its route protected but is far too expensive to restore. Today you seem to be saying that it should be restored and that it would ease congestion - where, exactly, I'm not entirely sure. Should it be restored, or is restoring it too expensive? Which of your previous irreconcilable opinions is the one you actually hold?
     
    oddsocks, 35B, oldmrheath and 3 others like this.
  4. 35B

    35B Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    3,285
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Having spent much time in the Telford area, and driven round Jackfield, I think the SVR are very wise in staying south of Bridgnorth. The geology is appalling, not helped by mining and the river. That extension, had it happened, would have been a good route to bankruptcy.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    RobT, oddsocks, Bluenosejohn and 2 others like this.
  5. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Part of the furniture Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,092
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    I think it's the lack of a destination that's the problem. If you want a branch for Auto Trains and DMUs at special events then the section the SVR own towards Burlish could fulfil that role.

    As for easing congestion, is there a lot of people communicating along the route whom would use the train instead of the car? I've not seen any evidence of it.
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  6. Tuska

    Tuska New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    26
    This is why I don't understand the obsession to get to Ironbridge. Attempting such a feat, when so much infrastructure has been long lost to modern development, would almost certainly lead to the society's total bankruptcy.

    Tenbury would be absurdly expensive.... but.... unlike trying to go northwards, it is at least viable up to Newnham Bridge station, and its not as remote as the Yukon (though some individuals I've listened to years ago would argue otherwise, in their amusing spiral of denial).

    @Forestpines, please tell me you understand the difference between safeguarding... and reopening? Judging by the exchange, I haven't already made it clear I am, in the present, in favor of the former, not the latter. Safeguarding means if ever that day ever arises where the society had the means and the money, they could announce bold plans to head that way.

    If Sustrans sit on the route, you've screwed both ways. You got a snowball's chance in Hell of ever reopening any small section of the branch, ever. They would rather kiss a horse's backside than surrender any part of their "network". Even if you wanted to, you can't go that way again, which places pressure on the society in the future to keep calming down calls from the public and media to keep going to Ironbridge again and again (which I sympathize with them, because this is getting repetitive for them).
     
  7. gwalkeriow

    gwalkeriow Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    584
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    Very, very few people at the SVR are obsessed with getting to Ironbridge as they have more than enough to deal with on the present section.
     
  8. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2015
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    217
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    [QUOTE If Sustrans sit on the route, you've screwed both ways. You got a snowball's chance in Hell of ever reopening any small section of the branch, ever. They would rather kiss a horse's backside than surrender any part of their "network". Even if you wanted to, you can't go that way again, which places pressure on the society in the future to keep calming down calls from the public and media to keep going to Ironbridge again and again (which I sympathize with them, because this is getting repetitive for them).[/QUOTE]

    Why such antipathy towards Sustrans? Managements can change and at least by creating cycle paths they provide some level of protection for a route. This may increase the chances that if (and it is a very big if) there is ever genuine demand for a rail re-opening it is more possible than the historic approach of routes being sold off piecemeal with cuttings filled as rubbish tips and buildings on parts of the track bed.

    Does anybody really think that hard pressed public bodies would be willing to protect disused railway routes, most of which are already in multiple ownership, unless use as cycle paths or similar occurs. 50 years ago it may have been wise for governments to protect route corridors but it didn't happen, heritage railways will never have the capacity to reverse all closures and at least organisations like Sustrans have opened up a number of closed routes for alternative use. Maybe not perfect but arguably better than complete disappearance.
     
  9. Robin

    Robin Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Stourbridge
    The former trackbed west of Dowles already forms part of National Cycle Route 45. Also the area it runs through is a designated SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest). The snowball melted years ago...
     
    Forestpines and Bluenosejohn like this.
  10. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,522
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Haven't the SVR got enough to contend with already? It must be the most civil engineering hungry line there is in terms of ongoing needs. As a certain other correspondent will tell you there is an optimum length of line that will give an acceptable overall journey time and the current SVR probably is already there. Unless the new destination is going to attract very significant visitor numbers its not worth jeopardising the rest of the railway for.
     
  11. Tuska

    Tuska New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    26
    The problems we've had with them over Bodmin and Wenford Railway.
    Refusing to relinquish the former Weedon to Leamington Spa line for freight.
    Forever trying to delay and stall the return of the Anglesey Central Railway.
    Acting as an effective roadblock for Pontypool and Blaenavon.

    I refuse to be naive around them any longer. They are uncompromising and lobbying, they simply do not want to see a return of Britain's rail network at its peak.

    @Robin, well, then, we're screwed in that regard...
    ...
    ...I love productive discussions.
     
  12. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    2,766
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I make no comment on the examples of Sustrans given above, other than they're not always so uncompromising, certainly in respect to the GWSR between Broadway and Honeybourne it is not dead in the water simply because it is owned by Sustrans.

    As for any SVR extensions, this very much falls into the WIBN category. There's no *real* arguments for it other than it would be very nice indeed. It's certainly not going to ease congestion or provide a significant community service. I do agree that it would be nice, especially with a 14xx and autocoach, but equally, there are lots of things that are already very very nice about the SVR, and I'm unconvinced that such an outlay would gain sufficient return.

    Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
     
    Bluenosejohn and Forestpines like this.
  13. threelinkdave

    threelinkdave Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    850
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Stratford-upon-Avon or in a brake KD to BH
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    As has been said the pressure to extend comes from outside the SVR. The logistics of running the current railway are enough. Today we had 4 steam hauled sets and a DMU out. Thats quite enough to find staff for
     
    oldmrheath, RobT, Robin and 8 others like this.
  14. D1039

    D1039 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,082
    Likes Received:
    734
    Location:
    North Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Were the SVR to want to extend then Ironbridge of the two is a destination or source of traffic, whereas Newnham Bridge isn't.

    An argument for Ironbridge is defensive, in case someone else was to lay a line there from Buildwas and abstract coach and other traffic from the SVR. As @gwalkeriow and others have said, it is moot anyway.

    Patrick
     
    RobT and Forestpines like this.
  15. Tuska

    Tuska New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    26
    Wasn't Coalport West railway station up for sale this year?

    Not that it matters, because again, National Cycle Route 45. But still, the owners have done a terrific job keeping the site pristine and the MK1 coaches outside are a nice addition.
     
  16. green five

    green five Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    874
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The latest issue of Heritage Railway reports that Standard Tank 80072 will be visiting the SVR to help out with the Christmas and New Year services.
     

Share This Page