If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

So, why exactly did....................

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by johnofwessex, Feb 8, 2017.

  1. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    5,225
    Given the number of industrial steam pics posted on the photo challenge thread which are dated in the 1970s I think the impact of the BR sell offs is being overstated.
     
  2. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Went with a TEFS group to GDR in 1975 and visited the NWR. Recall a rather sharp curve by Elend where someone went round a curve a little bit too fast and managed to get a standard gauge van shot off a transporter waggon..........
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2017
  3. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A number of posts have been unapproved for moderation purposes. Play nice please.
     
  4. Smokestack Lightning

    Smokestack Lightning Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    91
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, maybe not exactly. It may be true that they commissioned the Beeching report, and the lack of scrutiny of Marples' conflicts of interest seems extraordinary by today's standards (shame there was no Paxman back then!).

    But Harold Wilson recognised how unpopular the rail closures were, and the labour party went into the 1964 election with a promise to put a stop to them. It was a barefaced lie. Once elected they simply allowed the closures to go ahead.

    Dave
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2017
  5. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    8,239
    Likes Received:
    5,250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Location:
    Southport
    Steam locos in industry lasted only for those industrial locations where a short term future was envisaged and a change to diesel traction was uneconomic. The class 14s for example were bought in large numbers by both NCB and BSC as they had no reason to expect any change to their future; the NCB didn't expect Arthur Scargill to initiate the destruction of the coal industry and BSC didn't allow for cheap steel (dumping ?) from the USA in the 1970s.
     
  6. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    IIRC, Barbara Castle closed more miles of line than Marples. Let's not forget though that lines a-plenty were closing even before the Beeching report - the whole of the M&GN for example.

    To try and drag this back on-topic though; wouldn't the Clean Air Act also have played its part?
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2017
  7. Smokestack Lightning

    Smokestack Lightning Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    91
    Gender:
    Male
    True, although one would hope that the pre-Beeching closures were actually justified? No political party comes out of running the railways with any credit IMO, but I just wanted to correct the perception that "it was all down to the Conservatives".

    Yes, back on topic, I'm sure that the Clean Air Act must have been a factor, although diesel is hardly a clean technology. What is frustrating is the ham-fisted way the changeover was handled in this country. As many have already said, steam should have been phased out as electrification was phased in.

    Dave
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  8. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Please note that Insults or abuse in any language will not be tolerated.
     
  9. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    This is absolutely what should have happened. We had access to an excellent domestic electrical industry, and the ability to make what we needed for electrification although I am aware that there were acute shortages of copper post-war for wire. Which kind of makes you think "so why didn't we press on with it?". Hindsight however, is always 20/20!

    The major problem IIRC was that there was insufficient electrical power available (a huge programme of power station building occurred after the war); plus the winter of 1947 caused widespread power cuts as coal could not get to the power stations or for domestic consumption, and this then led to a rise in people buying electric fires to keep themselves warm. This added to the problem.

    As a result, the Attlee government subsequently introduced a punitive 125% purchase tax on electric fires!
     
    Smokestack Lightning likes this.
  10. Smokestack Lightning

    Smokestack Lightning Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    91
    Gender:
    Male
    I would have thought that, over a decade or two, the projected additional demand due to railway electrification could have been provided for in the plans for expanding power generation capacity. In the same way, today's planners should be factoring in the rise of electric vehicle ownership, whether battery or hydrogen powered.

    I hadn't heard the story about the electric fires before. Pay up or your family freezes! :)

    Dave
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2017
  11. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    1,225
    Two reasons I suspect. Firstly, Britain was essentially bankrupt after WWII, and even when money did become available the Attlee government preferred to prioritise the creation of the welfare state.

    But more importantly I think, as several posters have noted, there was an overwhelming pro-road bias among the politicians of the time, particularly Marples! Why bother to modernise the railway when cars were obviously the future? Ideas like "pollution" and "congestion" didn't seem to occur to them, and we are paying a price for that now.

    Yet the anti-HS2 lobby still make ridiculous claims such as "driverless cars will make HS2 redundant"...people just don't learn. (Or rather, they can't be bothered to find out facts that don't suit them! :mad:)
     
  12. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,319
    Likes Received:
    16,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't want HS2 and think it's a complete white elephant that will blight the countryside and peoples lives for very little but equally I think driverless cars are in a similar blind ally. How can you program a car for a day out where you are not sure where you are going and most people will take a lot persuading to allow a computer to take over what their Mk1 human brain is quite capable of doing
     
  13. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    HS2's biggest problem is rampant NIMBYism as it goes through some well-heeled areas. And I would venture to suggest that the needs of the UK's infrastructure and economy outweigh a few whiny NIMBYs.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2017
    60017 and John Stewart like this.
  14. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It came as quite a shock (no pun intended) to me too - I bought a large number of radio and electrical traders magazines from a very good friend of mine, which covered the period 1946 - 1953. This is one of the reasons I get narked when people bang on about "austerity" in the modern idiom; you can still walk into shops and buy any telly you like, any food you like - but an example at random from those magazines is "Mr. Smith has just taken delivery of his brand new delivery van for his radio shop. He has waited three years for it, having placed the order in 1946."
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  15. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    i'm expecting HS2 to at some point get shelved because as it has been pointed out it goes through Tory heartlands and local councils etc and local MP's will see their majorities being slashed, and will be putting pressure on whitehall to quietly let it drop , either that or their local councillors to be paid off, extra funding etc for local things to buy the locals to not rock the boat .
     
  16. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,119
    Likes Received:
    7,644
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    paulhitch likes this.
  17. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    5,225
    Sounds like in a former life you walked in front of cars with a red flag. Driverless cars are already here.
     
  18. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    SO , with driver less cars, will you still need to hold a licence ? after all it could be argued that the cars computer does the driving ;)
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  19. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,319
    Likes Received:
    16,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's assuming you believe that it is a need, I don't
     
  20. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,319
    Likes Received:
    16,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It won't happen, would you not want to be in control,of your vehicle?
     

Share This Page