If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

111 The Great Bear

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by neildimmer, May 1, 2017.

  1. neildimmer

    neildimmer Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    8,345
    Likes Received:
    946
    Moving on to George Jackson Churchward CME GWR 1902-1922


    George Jackson Churchward locos of the GWR : 111 The Great Bear


    The Great Bear, number 111, was a locomotive of the Great Western Railway. It was the first 4-6-2 (Pacific) locomotive used on a railway in Great Britain, and the only one of that type ever built by the GWR There are differing views as to why Churchward and the GWR should have built a pacific locomotive in 1908 when current and future locomotive practice for the railway was centred on the 4-6-0 wheel arrangement. One suggestion is that The Great Bear was built in 1908 to satisfy demands from the directors for the largest locomotive in Britain, and much was made of the locomotive by the GWR's publicity department. However, O. S. Nock was adamant that the design "was entirely due to Churchward, and not to outside influences that pressed the project upon him". Nock regarded the locomotive as "primarily an exercise in boiler design", with Churchward looking forward to a time when his Star Class locomotives could no longer cope with increasing loads.
    Rebuilding the loco as a 4-6-0

    "The front portion of the original frames and the number plates were used again but probably little else".[8] No. 111 emerged as a 4-6-0 in the Castle Class, and given the name Viscount Churchill. Thereafter the GWR did not use the Pacific wheel arrangement. No. 111 was withdrawn in July 1953.



    https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/GWRSteam-1/Churchward-Locomotives/Churchward-Tender-Locomotives/Churchward-Star-Class/Churchward-4-6-2-Pacific-111/i-mQbNPmp

    [​IMG]
    Churchward 4-6-2 Pacific 111 The Great Bear - Railway-Photography

    railway-photography.smugmug.com



    https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/GWRSteam-1/Churchward-Locomotives/Churchward-Tender-Locomotives/Churchward-Star-Class/Churchward-4-6-2-Pacific-111/i-n4hVqCF
    [​IMG]
    111 The Great Bear Paddington 21st August 1910 6.30pm Paddington-Bristol dining car express

    railway-photography.smugmug.com
    111 The Great Bear Paddington 21st August 1910 6.30pm Paddington-Bristol dining car express


    Neil
     
  2. MG 7305

    MG 7305 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    153
    Is it me or is taking 100+ year old photographs to which you patently do not own the copyright (and which are probably out of copyright anyway) and claiming copyright a little odd?
     
  3. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Could be worse - at least it's not an appeal to join a new-build project!
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  4. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Its probably not just you, but nevertheless he does has *some* copyright. If I scan a print of a photograph my scan of the photograph has a copyright on it. Its much more limited than the original photographer's rights, and doesn't override them, but it does exist. It doesn't, for example, preclude someone else scanning a print of the same photograph, and they too will have a copyright on their scan.
    This leads to the amusing situation that if I scan Bill's photograph, then I need Bill's permission to reproduce the photograph on my website. But if Bill wants to take a copy of my scan of his photograph and use it on his website he has to ask my permission! if Fred wants to copy my scan he has to ask both of us.
     
  5. MG 7305

    MG 7305 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    153
    Still looking for the UK view, but this would deny copyright in the US:

    briefer answer, U S. Perspective:

    "Using a scanner is considered mechanical reproduction. It isn't substantially different than photocopying , which I'm sure you recognize as infringement.

    When a device strips artistic choice from the operator, it's just copying. Scanning is not like photography, where composition, aperture or other exposure choices, really anything except for subject. Which any copier has to select anyway.

    Thus you can't legally claim copyright because you did not create a new work."

    It would seem perverse to state that the original image/negative is in thee public domain but any copy made in the last 70 years is not.
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2017
  6. D6332found

    D6332found Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    179
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dinting
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I am minded to think the front end of this was where the Castle's was borne but am not an expert. If so it deserves a bit of credit.
     
  7. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    All the designs are inter-related.
    The Bear's cylinders and motion were almost pure Star, but the boiler was new and much larger diameter.
    The Castle had almost the same cylinders and motion as the Stars, but greater cylinder diameter.
    The 4700 had a boiler with the same diameters as the Bear's but much shorter in the barrel and with a new narrow firebox
    The Castle boiler was based on the 4700 boiler with a very similar firebox, but a slightly smaller barrel to get the weight down to the limit.
     
  8. D6332found

    D6332found Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    179
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dinting
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    MAGNIFICENT, BUT ILL STARRED. Wish he'd sold it to the Great Northern
     
  9. R.W. Grant

    R.W. Grant New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired machinist
    Location:
    north central Pennsylvania usa
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Classic, sleek lines but does need a bit more cab. Those engine crews back then must have been tough cookies. The Canadians more or less invented the "all weather cab". #111 had a reverse all weather cab.
    That aside was it's performance similar to a Castle?
     
  10. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    I have read that, apart from the theoretical inefficiency of such long tubes, the firemen had trouble avoiding the exhaust pulling holes in the back corners of the fire which they couldn't see. It may be that they were keeping a much thinner fire than in contemporary standard boiler grates to avoid making too much steam; it wasn't the first wide firebox on the GWR, there had been the Krugers and of course the broad gauge 4-2-2s. It didn't even have a reputation for being sure footed despite the additional adhesive weight.

    I think the opinion of some crews was that it was inferior to a Star. Holcroft (who worked on the design of its cylinders) suggested that perhaps the reserve of power of the big boiler was intended to allow faster running on the gradients, but in the event it was banned from the Westbury route and west of Bristol, being restricted to 'Brunel's billiard table' between Paddington and Bristol.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2017
  11. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  12. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Dean was positively opposed to having any sort of cab so I guess, in it's day, 111s cab was seen as luxury
     
  13. Kinghambranch

    Kinghambranch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    White Rose County
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As a GWR enthusiast, I find writing this post rather disconcerting but, aesthetically at least, this loco looks very much "experimental" and its cab and tender (despite the latter being 8 wheeled- unusually for GWR tenders) seem totally lost! Not an overall elegant loco at all in my view. I understand that, in later years, No111 found a task which seemed to suit it well and it was used frequently on the Bristol-London "Cocoa" fast goods trains and, in turn, this influenced Churchward to design a 2-8-0 which could handle such trains in a similar way; the 4700 class. Happy to be enlightened further on this of course!
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  14. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    According to Holcroft the rear of the Bear was coming out too heavy, which probably explains the minimal cab.

    There's a (second hand) story in Tuplin (Great Western Power) about a fireman *filling* the Bear's firebox with coal before they got as far as Reading, and then cleaning up and putting no more coal on, having enough of a fire to get to Bristol. There's always a suspicion that some of Tuplin's stories have grown in the telling though, and this one was secondhand too.
     
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,101
    Likes Received:
    57,418
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I can't find the reference now, but I believe the tender on "the Great Bear" was more or less directly influenced by the Drummond double-bogie ("water cart") tenders of the LSWR. If so, not the soundest bit of industrial espionage, as those tenders were far from the strongest point on Drummond's locos, either æsthetically or practically.

    Tom
     
    Kinghambranch and LMS2968 like this.
  16. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    7,640
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Isn't the story that, upon learning of Gresley's plan to build a Pacific, Churchward said "What does that young man want to build one of those for? He could have had ours."
     
  17. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Have to disagree with you on that one; I think they looked good behind an H15/N15, T9 etc.
     
  18. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Bit far fetched I think. The story I heard is that Churchward thought the standard tender looked too small behind the big loco and wanted a longer one. What the tender is actually running on is two shortened locomotive bogies, which would certainly have been the quickest design involving the fewest new parts.

    Here's a sketch of the Bear with a standard tender. The custom tender had the same water and coal capacity as a standard one: it really does seem as if it was only constructed to look good!

    462-111Bear-6wheeltender.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2017
  19. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
    Did she have issues with overheating trailing truck bearings, being inside, and in close proximity to the firebox? Raven's Pacifics certainly did, and had to be modified.
     
  20. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,101
    Likes Received:
    57,418
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Out of interest, how long was The Great Bear with water cart tender, relative to the then-available turntables?

    Tom
     

Share This Page