If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Narrow gauge loco design

Discussion in 'Narrow Gauge Railways' started by andrewshimmin, Dec 9, 2017.

  1. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Wasn’t the issue with transshipment due to gauge difference the delay and extra cost for the railways’ customers, hence also the abandonment of broad gauge?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  2. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No transporter wagons back then! The thought of a full width BG wagon perched on a 2'-6" transporter is one I find oddly appealing.
     
  3. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I agree. Having seen rollwagen in Switzerland, I regret the lack of use here.

    However, my point remains - the impact of transshipment was on the customer, not the operator.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    @35B I've never actually seen any numbers relating to BG transhipment. The assumption has to be that like any cost, it would be factored into carriage rates, though whether it appeared as a separate charge I don't know. Would Railway Clearing House archives perhaps shed any light on the matter?
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not sure I quite understand that comment - Rolle Quay was a standard gauge siding, and the L&B was on the opposite side of the river:

    http://maps.nls.uk/view/105998003#zoom=4&lat=1908&lon=12268&layers=BT

    Tom
     
  6. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I concede your points, Paul, and you are right about the amateurish similarity between L&B and L&M. Neither one was really financially viable, and owed their existence to WIBN on a grand Victorian scale.
    In preservation though, the original business case for any line is immaterial, as is the wisdom of the rolling stock specification. 80 years on, they are the ones that got away, two glamour girls of British narrow gauge.
    The beautiful scenery through which they operated, and the attractiveness of the whole, locomotives, rolling stock, stations, bridges, are the things that matter to us and our rosy tinted hindsight and nostalgia. It was that rosy tinted hindsight and nostalgia that got Lyn built (which is the subject of the thread)

    Two questions for the assembly:
    1. Who built Leek & Manifold carriages
    2. Should there be a Calthrop/L&M thread. They keep leaking into other NG topics
     
  7. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  8. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    With the slate lines standard gauge wagons would still have required transshipment at the end of the quarry tramways. Indeed the Festiniog did originally build larger slate wagons but the quarries insisted on using the small wagons on their systems as they would fit narrow places and could be entirely loaded with the dressed slate from the ground whereas a man had to stand in the larger wagons to stack the slates in the centre.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2017
  9. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    1. Electric Railway and Tramway Carriage Co. Ltd.
    2. Has it not been done to death?

    PH
     
    ross likes this.
  10. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,437
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    1. I've a feeling it was Cravens, they did the transporter wagons at any rate, but away from my literature on the subject at the moment. Edit - Paul has answered with what I suspect is the correct answer.
    2. Probably!
     
  11. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Probably. I was thinking as much of the stories about Gloucester in gauge war days, and who suffered as a result.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  12. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    The LNWR also built standard gauge transporter wagons, and compatible 2ft gauge slate wagons, for slate traffic from Blaenau Ffestiniog to Deganwy for shipping onwards by sea. A Ffestipedia page about it here:
    https://www.festipedia.org.uk/wiki/LNWR_Slate_Wagons

    Steve B
     
    LesterBrown likes this.
  13. michaelh

    michaelh Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    1,291
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Very comfortably early retired
    Location:
    1029
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    As did many standard gauge lines.
     
    35B and paulhitch like this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    More than many methinks

    Didn't someone work out that we could have achieved the same level of connectivity (or whatever) with 12000 miles of railway that we did with the 20000 we actually built.................
     
    paulhitch likes this.
  15. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sounds highly likely. If you can recall whose calculations those were, it would be intriguing to track down some detail.
     
  16. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An online search of the National Archives suggests that the MW order books are available at Search Engine.

    Re the Loco Mag reference mentioned on the CRC Newsgroup, that article is about a 2'6" gauge Nasmyth Wilson 2-6-2 for the BNR, much of which is devoted to its poppet valve gear. I doubt it will help your quest.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  17. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    Given the loading gauge difficulties associated with putting SG wagons on NG transporters, was any consideration ever given - anywhere - of doing it the other way around, i.e. roll the NG wagon straight onto a suitably equipped SG flat-bed, tie down and away you go? Just curious (and with apologies for continuing the distraction from 'Lyn').
     
  18. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The 4'-0" gauge Padarn Railway used to do just that, with 2'-0" gauge slate wagons transhipped thus down to the port. Photo by Dave Mills (yolasite):
    Untitled-23%20x%20640.jpg.cf.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2017
    Chris86, michaelh, paulhitch and 2 others like this.
  19. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    Thanks (although not SG, shows the principle). And what a charming little railway that must have been!
     
    30854 likes this.
  20. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's a damned shame at least one of those locos wasn't preserved. They were broken up in the mid 1960's and all we have left of the 4'-0" fleet is the ancient Horlock 0-4-0 "Fire Queen" which survived as it was parked up in a shed and there it stayed until after the quarry closed!
    http://www.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/29/Fire_Queen.htm
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2017

Share This Page