If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Diesel Brake Tender

Discussion in 'Heritage Rolling Stock' started by bhallett, Apr 1, 2012.

  1. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I heard locomen did not like propelling them and that, at one point, actually refused to do so. Also that they were pretty unpopular as they caused extra shunting. Good idea to recreate one though, never saw one, don't recollect any in the North West at all
     
  2. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    I don't buy the extra shunting bit, for the reasons given in an earlier post, with photos.
     
  3. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
    They were well used on mineral traffic in the NE Region, both propelled and towed. There are plenty of photos around showing them in action with Sulzer Type 2s, EE Type 3s and even Claytons as the motive power.
     
    Martin Perry likes this.
  4. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217

    yes, in just the same way as a steam loco pulled or propelled it's tender.
     
    MarkinDurham likes this.
  5. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    I can't see the point in building a replica of a 'Saint', particularly when it involves the demise of a 'Hall' which is a class that the GWR developed from the 'Saint' obviously because the 'Hall' was a better engine. But it's not my money.

    As far as the DBT is concerned I think it was a case of, a Mk.1 carriage (15208) was being broken up for parts, the chassis was going to be scrapped and someone said 'why not do this with it'. And indeed, why not?

    It also means that we will be able to recreate this photo: http://www.rail-online.co.uk/p548073085/h4800f774#h4800f774.
     
    al4466 and Matt37401 like this.
  6. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Your perception of what a Saint and a Hall were built to do is awry. It's not a case of one being better than the other.
     
  7. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The Hall was a derivative of the Saint, with smaller wheels, for a mixed traffic role. Both good locos
     
    GWR4707 and Reading General like this.
  8. Reading General

    Reading General Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,081
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    yes the Hall was a hybrid, for pure Churchward you had to wait a while for the Grange to be built. Churchward's famous composite diagram detailed a 5'8" 4-6-0 but it was the Hall that got built instead. Won't be long before the Saint and the Grange are back with us
     
  9. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    No I'm saying it was a waste of fuel back in the day, the new equivalent doesn't need the concrete. What I was saying is why would anyone want to spend good money recreating something that made BR even more of a laughing stock than it already was at the time.
     
  10. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The new Saint is filling an important gap in the GWR loco history, we already have plenty of Halls to go round
     
  11. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's going to need some weight in there though, as regards spending money on something that made BR a laughing stock, why bother restoring a 9F that cost a fortune (at the time) to build and then only had a working life of at best 5 years. At the end of the day you can't stop people spending their money on what they want. To someone like yourself John it might show the worst of times on our railway, to me it's rather fascinating, just because it shows a time when our railways were at a bit of a crossroads dosn't mean it should be brushed under the carpet. I'm guessing the APT's at Crewe and Shildon would have the gas axe taken to them if you had your way?
     
    35B likes this.
  12. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It has it though.
     
  13. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    People can spend their money on what they like and the 9F was probably the most successful of the Standard classes, the short working life was down to some crass decisions by BR with its rush to dieselisation with untried and unreliable replacements. As for the APT, as a costly failure are they worthy of preservation? I don't know but they hold no interest for me.
     
  14. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,910
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Birmingham
    I'm sure the operating department that was having trouble stopping unfitted steam age freights with new diesels designed for fitted trains would beg to differ.
     
    Wenlock, 35B and Matt37401 like this.
  15. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    16,396
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Did no one think of a fitted head of revenue earning vehicles, I well remember this pathetic time in railway history when it was all cutbacks and no positive attitude at all
     
  16. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That was done when it could be, as it was with steam powered goods trains.
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,432
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I suspect without the ballast, you'd need to do a redesign on the brakes to avoid locking the wheels up easily. Whereas I'd take a guess that, when set against the weight of a whole train, loading up with 20-odd tons of extra ballast would make an almost negligible impact on the fuel usage.

    Tom
     
    35B likes this.
  18. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If I'm honest APT does little for me but the legacy of what BR started in the eighties continues in the Pendilino's that work today. The brake tender is something that is a reminder of the short sightedness of building hundreds of short wheelbase wagons without continuous brakes. We might always think the sun always shone in the past but there was a fair few rainy days too!
     
    Cartman likes this.
  19. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    2,413
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    At one time a lot of the 16T coal wagons were fitted with vac brakes, but it got damaged when been used on the coal hoist for loading ships so they had to be removed form these wagons.
     
  20. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What happens when the train gets to Leicester, Quorn or Rothley and there isn't the time or siding space to do the shunt?
     
    Wenlock likes this.

Share This Page