If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Saint Class 135 ish mph

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Reading General, May 5, 2017.

  1. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    William Kennedy?
     
    Courier likes this.
  2. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So.... the LNER chappie spotting mileposts and pressing a button is corroborated as accurate by the charts. This suggests that a man can be trained to accurately see and react to mileposts.

    However, Mr Rous-Marten, recognised by his peers as the foremost train timing expert, you do not credit with the skill to accurately see and react to mileposts.

    LNER mileposts are correct, as the human observer's sightings are corroborated by the dynamometer chart. GWR milepost positions in 1904 cannot be considered accurate.

    I am certain I read CRM "used a pair of Swiss chronographs"

    Your argument relies on making assumptions about man and equipment- just negative assumptions.
     
    Courier likes this.
  3. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Ross how do you think the LNER dynamometer car works?

    Clue: it’s not a man spotting mileposts pressing a button...

    It’s an ink line dragged across a continuously moving roll driven by an additional wheel, pressed to the railhead.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Your move.
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  4. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Read what I wrote
    "So.... the LNER chappie spotting mileposts and pressing a button is corroborated as accurate by the charts"
    referencing Courier, post 368

    And don't be patronising
     
  5. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Fact checking is key. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamometer_car

    My apologies.
     
  6. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    3,316
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Mallard - official
    Flying Scotsman - official
    CoT - unofficial
    2903 - extremely unofficial!

    That's what history says. Unless someone produces a smoking gun, that won't change, but the debate is awesome! Any conclusions outside of the above historical perimeters at this stage is still conjecture or possibly belongs in the realm of faith for those like me who have not delved as deeply.
     
    andrewshimmin and Bluenosejohn like this.
  7. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    3,316
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How does a dynocar get calibrated in 1938?
     
  8. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,063
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Add to that....35028 - (110 mph in 1966)....fabricated. So history provides us with the whole range and I guess the engineers amongst us can also add the dimension of plausibility to the various figures. Yes, it is an interesting debate that will, of course, change nothing.
     
  9. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm not sure it does. I don't believe there was any independent body cross checking the data and setting conditions for what constituted a record as there was for aviation and road. That's not surprising since that function was (and usually is) performed by the world association/governing body for the relevant sport and there was and is no sport of racing rail vehicles. If there were I suspect it would throw out just about all the records as being too much apples and oranges and gravity, but if it did allow gravity assist it would most likely authenticate COT at somewhere round 98 or 99, and Mallard at 125.
     
  10. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    3,316
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I did wonder about that - exactly who, if any, is the authenticating party as terms such as "official" or "authenticated" are widely used. Or, was it a case of "we did this, this is our proof, now you can go and report it/write about it in books". .???
     
  11. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How about:

    Official ................... there was a dynamometer car
    Authenticated ........ there was a dynamometer car and a bloke with a stopwatch
    Disputed ................ "Well you don't believe my claim"
    Dubious/doubtful .. Pretty much all of the above

    Does that help? :)
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  12. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A very fair point. Worth thinking about.
     
  13. Courier

    Courier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    117
    You are both correct. The LNER speeds were derived automatically - pen marking half second pulses on paper driven by wheel on rail. However there were also marks created by observers spotting mileposts. That was done to record where exactly on the line the dyno record was taken. D R Carling stated he was in a seat in the off-side bow window looking forwards and using a bell-push to mark on the record any mile posts, gradient boards, bridges etc that would serve to locate the train at any time. Percy Dobson was doing likewise on the near side.... (Carling's papers are held by the IMechE)

    That means the Mallard dyno roll can be used to indicate the likely accuracy of clocking mileposts - not something I had thought of, thank-you Ross.

    So this lunchtime I plotted out the time errors of the mileposts that were recorded during Mallard's run. That is possible by comparing the time difference between the milepost marks and the automatic quarter mile pulses.

    The results were:
    Mallard milepost time.jpg

    The error shown is the sum of milepost location error, human error (reaction times) and my measurement error. Ideally if you are trying to detect an error of circa 0.1 seconds you would be measuring with an accuracy of 0.01 seconds - but that is just 0.1 to 0.2 mm on the paper (depending on speed). I can't guarantee that - and so it is possible some of the scatter in the graph has been introduced by me.

    I would be interested in hearing people's thoughts on this data. One observation - it appears the higher the speed (mileposts 90 to 94) the better the accuracy - probably because at lower speeds the milepost takes more time to pass the window.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2017
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  14. Courier

    Courier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    117
    - The dyno roll doesn't show 125 mph. I've intentionally not said what I believe the max speed was as I'm still rechecking the data - but it won't be 125.

    - FS vs CoT with trailing loads in proportion to their weights would be an interesting comparison (a real world contest might also show that a 95 ton loco doesn't have a fireman twice as fit as a 55 ton loco - and in a longer run he or she might be the weakest link). One other difference - CoT's all out effort lasted less than 5 minutes, all the LNER ones were >10 minutes - that makes a big difference to the max possible power for any loco. (BTW my life would be much simpler if Truro had been a Great Central or L&Y loco - easier for all to be objective about the evidence and what is likely to have happened)

    - Mallard vs 05 002 dhp is an interesting comparison. At 100 mph Mallard was producing more power at the drawbar.
     
    Copper-capped likes this.
  15. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Interesting you say that, it was not something I was aware of. More apologies due to Ross from myself on that point.

    However you are indicating that the dynomometer car's roll is again more accurate than human using a bell push.

    Thereby introducing a different variable in the LNER results to the GWR ones - you can work out the actual distance between "mileposts" from plotting the time errors of the mile posts...

    I would be hesitant to comment at all on the likely accuracy of the mileposts from the human hand. Actually, based on what you have given to us above, I would ignore the positions of the mileposts supplied by the human hand altogether.

    The Dynamometer car roll allows you to work out the top speed, and gives you distance and time, thanks to the automatic mark. That is as you have demonstrated in your graph above, far more accurate than the human reaction giving a milepost plotting.

    This is because the likelihood is that, even if the dynamometer had some variable in terms of the slowing up and speeding up of the additional wheel on rail/paper through the rollers, it is consistent in its potential inaccuracy whereas the human reaction time is consistently inconsistent in its inaccuracy...!
     
  16. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Oh gosh no, they are useful. The automatic quarter mile tick is fixed in stone, but the manual ticks are reset at each one. That means that they provide a calibration of the automatic 1/4 mile ticks. Whilst the relationship between any individual manual mark and its adjacent automatic mark is going to be meaningless, if you take a rolling average of say the last half dozen manual ticks, then if the offset between the rolling average and the automatic tick changes according to a regular pattern then that indicates a calibration problem, either with the wheel or with the mileposts. If there is no such trend though, then that gives you confidence the calibration is good. If there is a definite and significant trend, though, that is tricky, because you then need to find out whether the wheel was badly calibrated, or whether the mileposts are badly set out. That could be fun!
     
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  17. Courier

    Courier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    117
    Exactly. There is indeed a small difference between the automatic mark and the milepost data - perhaps the measuring wheel was slipping very slightly - but the difference is small enough to ignore when quoting speeds. When I created the plot of timing error for the mileposts I factored that in - ie put a trendline through the points and then looked at the difference between each point and the trend line expressed as a time in seconds.

    However you are indicating that the dynomometer car's roll is again more accurate than human using a bell push.
    Over short distances you use the automatic ticks to check the errors in the manual ones. Over long distances (say milepost 105 to 85 - 40 feet of paper) you use the milepost ticks to check the automatic ones - because over such a long distance the errors in milepost position and human reaction time are insignificant.
     
    MellishR and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  18. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Gravity assistance or mortgaging boiler as mr Cox used to express it?
     
  19. Courier

    Courier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    117
    and a more sophisticated front end
     
  20. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Ok. So LNER chappie's marks vary (if I'm reading the chart accurately) from -0.2 to + 0.1 sec, so a variance of 0.3 sec. If CRM was using a 1/5 second chronograph, then that would add up to+/- 0.5 second error. So that might give a speed range for CoT of between 96.77mph and 108.43mph.

    So,(with tongue firmly in cheek) as we are talking GWR, we have to assume the higher speed was in fact the true one. And as a Saint has twice as many cylinders as a City, and 6 driving wheels rather than 4, that proves that the Saint must have been doing about 325 mph
     

Share This Page