If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Imperial units of measurement and the future?

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by Railboy, Oct 17, 2017.

  1. Sawdust

    Sawdust Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    508
    Likes Received:
    884
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm really chuffed having changed car recently, mine now says over 800 miles when full. Reassuringly today I noticed it has done 400 miles on half a tank. It's not a small car either. (Note this has been doing in excess of 200 miles per day this week of mostly motorway driving and observing speed limits.)

    Sawdust.
     
  2. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,433
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Nothing to do with decimals: to get the same level of accuracy you just need to quote to the same number of significant figures. So for example, 55 mpg (2 significant figures) is 5.1 l/100km (2 significant figures); but if the decimal point offends, you could express it as 51 l/1000km and it has exactly the same meaning, in a decimal free zone ...

    Tom
     
    Forestpines likes this.
  3. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Prejudice is a great time saver..
     
  4. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    Apropos milk: AFAIK the situation is still (as it certainly was some years ago) that SI units (and a few others based on them) are legally required for many things in the UK but with some specific exceptions. Two of the exceptions are that milk can legally be sold in pints (rather than litres) if it is in bottles; and beer and cider can legally be sold in pints if they are on draft, i.e. not in bottles. I think it is technically illegal for a pub to sell lemonade or shandy by the pint but allowed in practice.
     
  5. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But you are changing the goalposts for the sake of your argument, who uses l/1000km?
     
  6. NeilL

    NeilL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Occupation:
    Retired & OAPWay & tree feller
    Location:
    Staffordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If I am driving in Europe and change the settings to KPH rather than MPH the consumtion figures are in l/100km and it all makes sense. It is even good to see the figure dropping.
     
  7. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    You were arguing accuracy, not usage. It's you who's changing the goalposts.

    Simon
     
  8. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Can't see the logic in changing your readout just because you are driving in a different country. :confused:
     
  9. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Possibly to keep to the speed limits?
     
    TommyD and goldfish like this.
  10. NeilL

    NeilL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Occupation:
    Retired & OAPWay & tree feller
    Location:
    Staffordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Certainly - with the French keen to fine on the spot a speedo reading in local currency saves doubt.
     
    TommyD and goldfish like this.
  11. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    1,457
    But you're all missing the point. For the fuel consumption to mean anything in the muddled-up UK it needs to be in litres/mile (or miles/litre) or some variant thereof. Which of course, means mixing up both systems.
     
  12. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Absolutely.... and in any case, of all the factors affecting fuel consumption, none include what units the damned stuff is sold in!
     
    Kje7812 and MellishR like this.
  13. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    As a wine bottle is three quarters of a litre and quite nearly one sixth of a modern gallon - that is since the 183os - I have used this as convenient
    intermediate to calculate between fills from petrol pumps in litres to miles per gallon, the odometer being in miles.

    Railway relevance: the change from 16 to 20 fluid ounces to the pint was due to Davies Gilbert who was asked byTrevithick: what would be the
    loss in power of a steam engine running without a condenser? Gilbert said: in principle, one atmosphere/ 15 psi ( as rebranded in our
    life times, one "bar"). This caught on thoroughly via Penydarren, "Catch Me Who Can", Puffing Billy, the Rocket etc. to the developed
    steam locomotive and traction engine. The notion that a unit of five pints would catch on because with 2o fluid ounces to the pint
    there would be 100 fluid ounces in it went nowhere. And quite right too: the future of calculation
    with computing has become binary.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2017
  14. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    35,446
    Likes Received:
    9,144
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    Location:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No I'm not missing the point, we have successfully used mpg since motoring began, what would be the purpose of attempting to change to another system which, because it works the opposite way round, would cause more confusion. The fact that fuel is no longer sold in gallons is immaterial since it's very likely that most people either just fill up, or work to a price whatever country they are in.
     
  15. Sawdust

    Sawdust Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    508
    Likes Received:
    884
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The purpose of mpg figures is to compare vehicles, trips etc. against one another, so what fuel is sold in is irrelevant.

    Sawdust.
     
    RalphW, William Shelford and 30854 like this.
  16. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    If you use a spreadsheet (as I do) to keep track of your car's fuel consumption in mpg, you need to include a conversion factor for litres to gallons. But that is a one-off task when setting up the spreadsheet.
     
  17. John Baritone

    John Baritone New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2018
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    134
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Buxton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think you'll find that inches and feet were used as units of measure in other parts of the world, too, Toplight - after all, before such things as tape measures and rules were invented, what other way would you have of measuring things, other than comparing them to bits of your body?

    Horses and ponies are still measured in hands and inches, with one hand being four inches; beer and milk in pints; sheets of plywood are either 8 x 4 feet, or 6 x 4 (regardless of shops marking them in mm!); throughout most of officially metric Europe, their main line railways' track gauge is 4' 8 1/2" - or 5 feet or 5' 3"; and (contrary to what Railboy said) modern industry does NOT only use SI units - every integrated circuit has its legs on 0.1" centres!

    There's a lot of rather silly criticism of the multiplicity of units of measurement in the Imperial system, and the difficulty of converting one to another; in reality, I found that once I started work, every job used units which were appropriate to that line of work, so you never had to convert chains to inches - because people like land surveyors (who worked in chains and links) had no need to use inches, and bricklayers who worked in yards, feet and inches never needed to use chains. Similarly, fencers and ditchers used rods, because it was a handy size for them. Compare that with an engineering drawing I saw of a double decker bus, where every dimension was marked on the drawing in millimetres!

    And how about the fathom (6 feet)? Dead handy for measuring lengths of rope - hold one end of the rope between finger and thumb, stretch your arms wide and grasp the other end between finger and thumb on the other hand, and you've got a fathom of rope. And not many people know that, in early English, 'fathom' meant to embrace, and was the length a lover could wrap his arms around his beloved! Which is why we still use the word 'fathom' in the sense of grasping something - e.g., "I couldn't fathom it at first, but now I've got it."

    And what about drill bits? The old letter and number series drills make perfect sense when you realise that rather than going up in fixed steps, they go up by a steady percentage in size - so if one is a tad too small, you can go to the next drill in the series, and it will be a reasonable amount larger, regardless of whereabouts in the range it is, rather than going up in fixed amounts like 1mm or 0.5mm, which may well be too coarse in the smaller drills, and too small in larger sizes.

    And the ultimate irony; I read a bit of a blog written by a bloke who had moved to Provence in France, and called in a few local carpenters and builders to do some repairs and renovations. He was watching them marking out a job one day, looked closer and found they weren't using metric measurements at all. When he asked, it turned out they were still using measurements based on parts of the human body - like the width of a thumb, the distance from fingertips to elbow, and the length of a foot - which were standard units of measure in France before the Metric system was invented!

    When the Englishman suggested that they ought to be working in Metric measure, the tradesman looked at him in puzzlement, and said "Pourquoi?"
    :D
     
    damianrhysmoore, pmh_74, jnc and 2 others like this.
  18. Forestpines

    Forestpines Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,681
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere in the UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The whole "Integrated circuits use imperial measurements" thing is probably a bit outdated. It certainly used to be true that IC packages had legs at 0.1" pitch - but ICs with that package standard are now a relatively small proportion of the market.

    As I said upthread, one of the big problems with non-metric measurement was that many countries used vaguely similar measurements with similar names, but there was no standardisation. For example, Sweden and Ireland both standardised on 3 foot gauge for narrow gauge lines - but in Ireland that was 914mm and in Sweden it was 891mm.
     
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  19. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Bus Driver
    Location:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    "Inch" seems to have varied quite a lot. I read somewhere of some rifles made in USA to drawings supplied by Enfield. The parts were not interchangeable with Enfield built because nobody had told the Americans that the drawing were based on the "Enfield Inch" not the normal Imperial Inch.

    My old childhood encyclopaedias listed several different "Mile" measurements.

    (Regardless of the still current "Nautical Mile" and almost identical "Sea Mile")
     
    andrewshimmin and Forestpines like this.
  20. I. Cooper

    I. Cooper Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    666
    Location:
    Salop
    As a grand statement, you're correct that it's total rubbish - only DIP packaged ICs are 0.1" pitch, and you're correct they're only a stupidly small proportion of ICs used these days. However the surface mount "SOIC" package is at 0.05" pitch - they're used quite a lot...

    ...however most of the various "SOP" packages (of which there are many different) are at 0.5mm pitch, SOTs are 0.95mm, which isn't a round number imperial dimension either. 0.65mm pitch is another pitch encountered (0.02559" - almost, not quite!), quad flat packs are often 0.8mm pitch. Once you get to BGA packages the common pitches are 0.5mm , 0.8mm , 1mm. Anyone saying "ICs use imperial" is showing their lack of knowledge of the subject matter.

    In terms of connectors you still can encounter quite a few 0.1" pitch parts, but then there are an awful lot of 2mm pitch connectors as well, along with 5mm pitch and a host of others, so not enough to build an argument one way or another. You used to encounter BA threads quite a bit in electronics, although usually they're metric now. Of course B.A. stands for "British Association" and are neither a metric nor an imperial thread system, the diameter starts at 6mm OD and 1mm pitch (so is it metric?) but then each size after that is a geometric progression, so most BA sizes aren't a round number in either metric or imperial (although some come close: 5BA = 0.126", whilst 7BA = 2.5mm), and the pitch is neither a round number in either system either. The thread angle is unique to BA as well, and the profile is different to both metric, imperial or the American interpretations.

    To say the electronics industry is ruled by imperial dimensions is rubbish, however it does have a mix of systems. Ultimately they're just numbers, it makes not a blind bit of difference what the system is called. When setting up component cells do you space the pins at 2.54mm, or 0.1"? Sorting boards you'll often order either 0.8mm or 1.6mm thickness, but then choose between 1oz or 2oz copper for it.

    Who cares, I was brought up and educated in the metric system. If I'm working on something built to metric dimensions I'll use metric. If I'm working on something built to imperial dimensions I'll use imperial - saying something is 8" long is a lot easier than 203.2mm, but then saying something is 12mm is easier than 0.47244094488188976377952755905512".

    If I'm working to my own choice it'll tend to be biased towards imperial, but I'm not afraid to throw something odd in using metric if it happens to be a more convenient figure - they're just numbers representing a distance (or weight, or volume, or pressure...). It ain't the end of the world to swap between. Does your computer run on Unix, Windows, DOS, CPM, Mac OS? Underlying hardware doesn't care, and they all do the same end result. (and it seems you get obsessive fanboys for each of those as you do for measurement systems).
     
    Forestpines likes this.

Share This Page